======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/patrick-cockburn-the-us-is-failing-haiti-ndash-again-1869539.html
January 16, 2010
Patrick Cockburn: The US is failing Haiti - again
There is nobody to co-ordinate the most rudimentary relief and rescue 
efforts

The US-run aid effort for Haiti is beginning to look chillingly similar 
to the criminally slow and disorganised US government support for New 
Orleans after it was devastated by hurricane Katrina in 2005.

Five years ago President Bush was famously mute and detached when the 
levees broke in Louisiana. By way of contrast, President Obama was 
promising Haitians that everything would be done for survivors within 
hours of the calamity.

The rhetoric from Washington has been very different during these two 
disasters, but the outcome may be much the same. In both cases very 
little aid arrived at the time it was most needed and, in the case of 
Port-au-Prince, when people trapped under collapsed buildings were still 
alive. When foreign rescue teams with heavy lifting gear does come it 
will be too late. No wonder enraged Haitians are building roadblocks out 
of rocks and dead bodies.

In New Orleans and Port-au-Prince there is the same official terror of 
looting by local people, so the first outside help to arrive is in the 
shape of armed troops. The US currently has 3,500 soldiers, 2,200 
marines and 300 medical personnel on their way to Haiti.

Of course there will be looting because, with shops closed or flattened 
by the quake, this is the only way for people to get food and water. 
Haiti is one of the poorest countries in the world. I was in 
Port-au-Prince in 1994, the last time US troops landed there, when local 
people systematically tore apart police stations, taking wood, pipes and 
even ripping nails out of the walls. In the police station I was in 
there were sudden cries of alarm from those looting the top floor as 
they discovered that they could not get back down to the ground because 
the entire wooden staircase had been chopped up and stolen.

I have always liked Haitians for their courage, endurance, dignity and 
originality. They often manage to avoid despair in the face of the most 
crushing disasters or any prospect that their lives will get better. 
Their culture, notably their painting and music, is among the most 
interesting and vibrant in the world.

It is sad to hear journalists who have rushed to Haiti in the wake of 
the earthquake give such misleading and even racist explanations of why 
Haitians are so impoverished, living in shanty towns with a minimal 
health service, little electricity supply, insufficient clean water and 
roads that are like river beds.

This did not happen by accident. In the 19th century it was as if the 
colonial powers never forgave Haitians for staging a successful slave 
revolt against the French plantation owners. US marines occupied the 
country from 1915 to 1934. Between 1957 and 1986 the US supported Papa 
Doc and Baby Doc, fearful that they might be replaced by a regime 
sympathetic to revolutionary Cuba next door.

President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, a charismatic populist priest, was 
overthrown by a military coup in 1991, and restored with US help in 
1994. But the Americans were always suspicious of any sign of radicalism 
from this spokesman for the poor and the outcast and kept him on a tight 
lead. Tolerated by President Clinton, Aristide was treated as a pariah 
by the Bush administration which systematically undermined him over 
three years leading up to a successful rebellion in 2004. That was led 
by local gangsters acting on behalf of a kleptocratic Haitian elite and 
supported by members of the Republican Party in the US.

So much of the criticism of President Bush has focused on his wars in 
Afghanistan and Iraq that his equally culpable actions in Haiti never 
attracted condemnation. But if the country is a failed state today, 
partly run by the UN, in so far as it is run by anybody, then American 
actions over the years have a lot to do with it.

Haitians are now paying the price for this feeble and corrupt government 
structure because there is nobody to co-ordinate the most rudimentary 
relief and rescue efforts. Its weakness is exacerbated because aid has 
been funnelled through foreign NGOs. A justification for this is that 
less of the money is likely to be stolen, but this does not mean that 
much of it reaches the Haitian poor. A sour Haitian joke says that when 
a Haitian minister skims 15 per cent of aid money it is called 
"corruption" and when an NGO or aid agency takes 50 per cent it is 
called "overheads".

Many of the smaller government aid programmes and NGOs are run by able, 
energetic and selfless people, but others, often the larger ones, are 
little more than rackets, highly remunerative for those who run them. In 
Kabul and Baghdad it is astonishing how little the costly endeavours of 
American aid agencies have accomplished. "The wastage of aid is sky 
high," said a former World Bank director in Afghanistan. "There is real 
looting going on, mostly by private enterprises. It is a scandal." 
Foreign consultants in Kabul often receive $250,000 to $500,000 a year, 
in a country where 43 per cent of the population try to live on less 
than a dollar a day.

None of this bodes well for Haitians hoping for relief in the short term 
or a better life in the long one. The only way this will really happen 
is if the Haitians have a legitimate state capable of providing for the 
needs of its people. The US military, the UN bureaucracy or foreign NGOs 
are never going to do this in Haiti or anywhere else.

There is nothing very new in this. Americans often ask why it is that 
their occupation of Germany and Japan in 1945 succeeded so well but more 
than half a century later in Iraq and Afghanistan was so disastrous. The 
answer is that it was not the US but the efficient German and Japanese 
state machines which restored their countries. Where that machine was 
weak, as in Italy, the US occupation relied with disastrous results on 
corrupt and incompetent local elites, much as they do today in Iraq, 
Afghanistan and Haiti.

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to