======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


We should take note of the calls to "rebuild" Haiti by Obama and the New
York Times and others. In US lingo, this usually means not so much improving
material conditions as "restructuring" the economy to fit the needs of US
military strategy and big business. For instance, the IMF to freeze the
wages of government personnel as part of the price of it’s "aid."

I also wonder what will happen to the Cuban doctors who have been helping
Haitians for a number of years. Will there be a move to replace them with US
or allied personnel (or perhaps simply with insurance salespeople since that
is becoming the official definition of medical care in the United States)?
Fred Feldman


http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17000
The Militarization of Emergency Aid to Haiti: Is it a Humanitarian Operation
or an Invasion? 

By Michel Chossudovsky


Global Research, January 15, 2010

Haiti has a longstanding history of US military intervention and occupation
going back to the beginning of the 20th Century. US interventionism has
contributed to the destruction of Haiti's national economy and the
impoverishment of its population. 

The devastating earthquake is presented to World public opinion as the sole
cause of the country's predicament. 

A country has been destroyed, its infrastructure demolished. Its people
precipitated into abysmal poverty and despair.

Haiti's history, its colonial past have been erased. 

The US military has come to the rescue of an impoverished Nation. What is
its Mandate?
Is it a Humanitarian Operation or an Invasion? 
The main actors in America's "humanitarian operation" are the Department of
Defense, the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International
Development (USAID). (See USAID Speeches: On-The-Record Briefing on the
Situation in Haiti, 01/13/10). USAID has also been entrusted in channelling
food aid to Haiti, which is distributed by the World Food Program. (See
USAID Press Release: USAID to Provide Emergency Food Aid for Haiti
Earthquake Victims, January 13, 2010)

The military component of the US mission, however, tends to overshadow the
civilian functions of rescuing a desperate and impoverished population. The
overall humanitarian operation is not being led by civilian governmental
agencies such as FEMA or USAID, but by the Pentagon. 
The dominant decision making role has been entrusted to US Southern Command
(SOUTHCOM). 

A massive deployment of military hardware personnel is contemplated. The
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen has confirmed that
the US will be sending nine to ten thousand troops to Haiti, including 2000
marines. (American Forces Press Service, January 14, 2010) Aircraft carrier,
USS Carl Vinson and its complement of supporting ships has already arrived
in Port au Prince. (January 15, 2010).  The  2,000-member Marine Amphibious
Unit as well as and soldiers from the U.S. Army's 82nd Airborne division
"are trained in a wide variety of missions including security and
riot-control in addition to humanitarian tasks." In contrast to rescue and
relief teams dispatched by various civilian teams and organizations, the
humanitarian mandate of the US military is not clearly defined:  

“Marines are definitely warriors first, and that is what the world knows the
Marines for,... [but] we’re equally as compassionate when we need to be, and
this is a role that we’d like to show -- that compassionate warrior,
reaching out with a helping hand for those who need it. We are very excited
about this.” (Marines' Spokesman, Marines Embark on Haiti Response Mission,
Army Forces Press Services, January 14, 2010) While presidents Obama and
Préval spoke on the phone, there were no reports of negotiations between the
two governments regarding the entry and deployment of US troops on Haitian
soil. The decision was taken and imposed unilaterally by Washington. The
total lack of a functioning government in Haiti was used to legitimize, on
humanitarian grounds, the sending in of a powerful military force, which has
de facto taken over several governmental functions.   



TABLE 1
US Military Assets  to be Sent to Haiti. (according to official
announcements) 

The amphibious assault ship USS Bataan (LHD 5) and amphibious dock landing
ships USS Fort McHenry (LSD 43) and USS Carter Hall (LSD 50). 
A 2,000-member Marine Amphibious Unit from the 22nd Marine Expeditionary
Unit and soldiers from the U.S. Army's 82nd Airborne division.  900 soldiers
are slated to arrive in Haiti by January 15th. 
Aircraft carrier, USS Carl Vinson and its complement of supporting ships.
(arrived in Port au Prince on January 15, 2010):  USS Carl Vinson CVN 70 The
hospital ship USNS Comfort Several U.S. Coast Guard vessels and helicopters 

USS Carl Vinson
The three amphibious ships will join aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson,
guided-missile cruiser USS Normandy and guided-missile frigate USS
Underwood. 

USS Normandy

Leading Role of US Southern Command US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) with
headquarters in Miami is the "lead agency" in Haiti. Its mandate as a
regional military command is to carry out modern warfare. Its stated mission
in Latin America and the Caribbean is  "to conduct military operations and
promote security cooperation to achieve U.S. strategic objectives." (Our
Mission - U.S. Southern Command (USSOUTHCOM) The commanding officers  are
trained to oversee theater operations, military policing as well
"counterinsurgency" in Latin America and the Caribbean, including the recent
establishment of new US military bases in Colombia, within proximity of the
Venezuelan border.  

General Douglas Fraser, commander of U.S. Southern Command has defined the
Haiti emergency operation as a Command, Control, Communications operation
(C3). US Southern Command is to oversee a massive deployment of military
hardware, including several warships, an aircraft carrier, airborne combat
divisions, etc: 

"So we're focused on getting command and control and communications there so
that we can really get a better understanding of what's going on. MINUSTAH
[United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti], as their headquarters
partially collapsed, lost a lot of their communication, and so we're looking
to robust that communication, also. 
We're also sending in assessment teams in conjunction with USAID, supporting
their efforts, as well as putting in some of our own to support their
efforts. 

We're moving various ships that we had in the region -- they're small ships,
Coast Guard cutters, destroyers -- in that direction, to provide whatever
immediate assistance that we can on the ground. 

We also have a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier, the USS Carl Vin son, moving in
that direction. It was at sea off of Norfolk, and so it's going to take a
couple of days for it to get there. We need to also just resupply it and
give it the provisions it needs to support the effort as we look at Haiti.
And then we're looking across the international agencies to figure out how
we support their efforts as well as our efforts. 

We also are looking at a large-deck amphibious ship with an embarked Marine
Expeditionary Unit on it that will be a couple of days behind the USS
Vinson. 

And that gives us a broader range of capability to move supplies around, to
have lift capability to help support the effort there also. 
So bottom line to it is, we don't have a clear assessment right now of what
the situation on the ground is, what the needs within Port-au-Prince are,
how extensive the situation is. 

We also, finally, have a team that's headed in to the airport. From my
understanding -- because my deputy commander just happened to be in Haiti
when this situation happened, on a previously scheduled visit. He has been
to the airport. He says the runway is functional but the tower doesn't have
communications capability. The passenger terminal -- has structural damage
to it, so we don't know what the status of it is. 

So we have a group going in to make sure we can gain and secure the airfield
and operate from it, because that's one of those locations we think we're
going to have a lot of the immediate effort from an international basis
going into. 

And then we're out conducting all the other assessments that you would
consider appropriate as we go in and work this effort. 

We're also coordinating on the ground with MINUSTAH, with the folks who are
there. The commander for MINUSTAH happened to be in Miami when this
situation happened, so he's right now traveling back through and should be
arriving in Port-au-Prince any time now. So that will help us coordinate our
efforts there also, because again, obviously the United Nations suffered a
significant loss there with the collapse -- at least partial collapse of
their headquarters. 

So that's -- those are the initial efforts that we have ongoing And as we
get the assessments of what's coming next, then we'll adjust as required. 
The secretary of Defense, the president, have all stipulated that this is a
significant effort, and we're corralling all the resources within the
Department of Defense to support this effort." (Defense.gov News Transcript:
DOD News Briefing with Gen. Fraser from the Pentagon, January 13, 2010)

A Heritage Foundation report summarizes the substance of America's mission
in Haiti: "The earthquake has both humanitarian and U.S. national security
implications [requiring] a rapid response that is not only bold but
decisive, mobilizing U.S. military, governmental, and civilian capabilities
for both a short-term rescue and relief effort and a longer-term recovery
and reform program in Haiti." (James M. Roberts and Ray Walser, American
Leadership Necessary to Assist Haiti After Devastating Earthquake, Heritage
Foundation, January 14, 2010). 

At the outset, the military mission will be involved in first aid and
emergency as well as public security and police activities. US Air Force
Controls the Airport

The US Air Force has taken over air traffic control functions as well as the
management of Port au Prince airport. In other words, the US military
regulates the flow of emergency aid and relief supplies which are being
brought into the country in civilian planes. The US Air Force is not working
under the instructions of Haitian Airport officials. These officials have
been displaced. The airport is run by the US Military (Interview with
Haitian Ambassador to the US R. Joseph, PBS News, January 15, 2010) 

"The FAA's team is working with DOD combat controllers to improve the flow
of air traffic moving in and out of the airport. The US Air Force reopened
the airport on 14 January, and on 15 January its contingency response group
was granted senior airfield authority ... Senior airfield authority enables
the Air Force to prioritise, schedule and control the airspace at the
airport, ..." (flightglobal.com, January 16, 2010, emphasis added) 

The 1,000-bed U.S. Navy hospital ship, USNS Comfort, which includes more
than 1,000 medical and support personnel has been sent to Haiti under the
jurisdiction of Southern Command. (See  Navy hospital ship with 1,000 beds
readies for Haiti quake relief, Digital Journal, January 14, 2010). There
were, at the time of the Earthquake, some 7100 military personnel and over
2000 police, namely a foreign force of over 9000. In contrast, the
international civilian personnel of MINUSTAH is less than 500. MINUSTAH
Facts and Figures - United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti

TABLE 2 

United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH) 

Current strength (30 November 2009)

9,065 total uniformed personnel

7,031 troops
2,034 police 488 international civilian personnel
1,212 local civilian staff
214 United Nations Volunteers 

MINUSTAH Facts and Figures - United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti


Estimated combined SOUTHCOM and MINUSTAH forces; 19,095* *Excluding
commitments by France (unconfirmed) and Canada (confirmed 800 troops). The
US, France and Canada were "partners" in the February 29, 2004 Coup d'État. 


Haiti has been under foreign military occupation since the US instigated
February 2004 Coup d'Etat. The contingent of US forces under SOUTHCOM
combined with those of MINUSTAH brings foreign military presence in Haiti to
close to 20,000 in a country of 9 million people. In  comparison
in Afghanistan, prior to Obama's military surge, combined US and NATO forces
were of the order of 70,000 for a population of 28 million. In other words,
on a per capita basis there will be more troops in Haiti than in
Afghanistan. 

Recent US Military Interventions in Haiti

There have been several US sponsored military interventions in recent
history. In 1994, following three years of military rule, a force of  20,000
occupation troops and "peace-keepers" was sent to Haiti. The 1994 US
military intervention "was not intended to restore democracy. Quite the
contrary: it was carried out to prevent a popular insurrection against the
military Junta and its neoliberal cohorts." (Michel Chossudovsky, The
Destabilization of Haiti, Global Research, February 28, 2004) US and allied
troops remained in the country until 1999. The Haitian armed forces were
disbanded and the US State Department hired a mercenary company DynCorp to
provide "technical advice" in restructuring the Haitian National Police
(HNP). (Ibid). 

The February 2004 Coup d'État

In the months leading up to the 2004 Coup d'Etat, US special forces and the
CIA were training death squadrons composed of the former tonton macoute of
the Duvalier era. The Rebel paramilitary army crossed the border from the
Dominican Republic in early February 2004. "It was a well armed, trained and
equipped paramilitary unit integrated by former members of Le Front pour
l'avancement et le progrès d'Haiti (FRAPH), the "plain clothes" death
squadrons, involved in mass killings of civilians and political
assassinations during the CIA sponsored 1991 military coup, which led to the
overthrow of the democratically elected government of President Jean
Bertrand Aristide." (see Michel Chossudovsky,  The Destabilization of Haiti:
Global Research. February 28, 2004) Foreign troops were sent into Haiti.
MINUSTAH was set up in the wake of the US sponsored coup d'Etat in February
2004 and the kidnapping and deportation of the democratically elected
president Jean Bertrand Aristide. The coup was instigated by the US with the
support of  France and Canada. 

The FRAPH units subsequently integrated the country's police force, which
was under the supervision of MINUSTAH. In the political and social disarray
triggered by the earthquake, the former armed militia and Ton Ton macoute
will be playing a new role. 

Hidden Agenda
The unspoken mission of US Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) with headquarters in
Miami and US military installations throughout Latin America is to ensure
the maintenance of subservient national regimes, namely US proxy
governments, committed to the Washington Consensus and the neoliberal policy
agenda. While US military personnel will at the outset be actively involved
in emergency and disaster relief, this renewed US military presence in Haiti
will be used  to establish a foothold in the country as well pursue
America's strategic and geopolitical objectives in the Caribbean basin,
which are largely directed against Cuba and Venezuela. 
The objective is not to work towards the rehabilitation of the national
government, the presidency, the parliament, all of which has been decimated
by the earthquake. Since the fall of the Duvalier dictatorship, America's
design has been to gradually dismantle the Haitian State, restore colonial
patterns and obstruct the functioning of a democratic government. In the
present context, the objective is not only to do away with the government
but also to revamp the mandate of the United Nations Stabilization Mission
in Haiti (MINUSTAH), of which the headquarters have been destroyed. 

"The role of heading the relief effort and managing the crisis quickly fell
to the United States, for lack -- in the short term, at least -- of any
other capable entity." ( US Takes Charge in Haiti _ With Troops, Rescue Aid
- NYTimes.com, January 14, 2009) Prior to the earthquake, there were,
according to US military sources, some 60 US military personnel in Haiti.
>From one day to the next, an outright military surge has occurred: 10,000
troops, marines, special forces, intelligence operatives, etc., not to
mention private mercenary forces on contract to the Pentagon.  

In all likelihood the humanitarian operation will be used as a pretext and
justification to establish a more permanent US military presence in Haiti.  

We are dealing with a massive deployment, a "surge" of military personnel
assigned to emergency relief. 

The first mission of SOUTHCOM will be to take control of what remains of the
country's communications, transport and energy infrastructure.

Already, the airport is under de facto US control. In all likelihood, the
activities of MINUSTAH which from the outset in 2004 have served US foreign
policy interests, will be coordinated with those of SOUTHCOM, namely the UN
mission will be put under de facto control of the US military.

The Militarization of Civil Society Relief Organizations The US military in
Haiti seeks to oversee the activities of approved humanitarian
organizations. It also purports to encroach upon the humanitarian activities
of Venezuela and Cuba: 

"The government under President René Préval is weak and literally now in
shambles. Cuba and Venezuela, already intent on minimizing U.S. influence in
the region, are likely to seize this opportunity to raise their profile and
influence..." (James M. Roberts and Ray Walser, American Leadership
Necessary to Assist Haiti After Devastating Earthquake, Heritage Foundation,
January 14, 2010). 

In the US, the militarization of emergency relief operations was instigated
during the Katrina crisis, when the US military was called in to play a lead
role.  

The model of emergency intervention for SOUTHCOM is patterned on the role
of NORTHCOM, which was granted a mandate as "the lead agency" in US domestic
emergency procedures. 

During Hurricane Rita in 2005, the detailed groundwork for the
"militarization of emergency relief" involving a leading role for
NORTHCOM was established. In this regard, Bush had hinted to the central
role of the military in emergency relief: "Is there a natural disaster--of a
certain size--that would then enable the Defense Department to become the
lead agency in coordinating and leading the response effort? That's going to
be a very important consideration for Congress to think about." (Statement
of President Bush at a press conference, Bush Urges Shift in Relief
Responsibilities - washingtonpost.com, September 26, 2005). 

"The response to the national disaster is not being coordinated by the
civilian government out of Texas, but from a remote location and in
accordance with military criteria. US Northern Command Headquarters will
directly control the movement of military personnel and hardware in the Gulf
of Mexico. As in the case of Katrina, it will override the actions of
civilian bodies. Yet in this case, the entire operation is under the
jurisdiction of the military rather than under that of FEMA." (Michel
Chossudovsky, US Northern Command and Hurricane Rita, Global Research,
September 24, 2005) 

Concluding Remarks

Haiti is a country under military occupation since the US instigated Coup
d'Etat of February 2004. 

The entry of ten thousand heavily armed US troops, coupled with the
activities of local militia could potentially precipitate the country into
social chaos. 

These foreign forces have entered the country to reinforce MINUSTAH
"peacekeepers" and Haitian police forces (integrated by former Tonton
Macoute), which since 2004, have been responsible for war crimes directed
against the Haitian people, including the indiscriminate killing of
civilians. 

These troups reinforce the existing occupation forces under UN mandate. 

Twenty thousand foreign troops under SOUTHCOM and MINUSTAH commands will be
present in the country. In all likelihood, there will be an integration or
coordination of the command structures of SOUTHCOM and MINUSTAH. The Haitian
people have exhibited a high degree of solidarity, courage and social
commitment. 

Helping one another and acting with consciousness: under very difficult
conditions, in the immediate wake of the disaster, citizens rescue teams
were set up spontaneously. 

The militarization of relief operations will weaken the organizational
capabilities of Haitians to rebuild and reinstate the institutions of
civilian government which have been destroyed. It will also encroach upon
the efforts of the international medical teams and civilian relief
organisations. 

It is absolutely essential that the Haitian people continue to forcefully
oppose the presence of foreign troops in their country, particularly in
public security operations. 

It is essential that Americans across the land forcefully oppose the
decision of the Obama adminstration to send US combat troops to Haiti. 
There can be no real reconstruction or development under foreign military
occupation. 

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility
of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for
Research on Globalization. The contents of this article are of sole
responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization
will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements
contained in this article.

To become a Member of Global Research

The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on
community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The
source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of
Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial
internet sites, contact: [email protected] 

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not
always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making
such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in
an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and
social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and
educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes
other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]

© Copyright Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, 2010 

The url address of this article is: 

www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=17000



________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to