======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


OK, one last post each?  Sure, that gives the slandering poseur Gorojovsky 
one more opportunity to fire off another round of spittle from that squirt 
gun he calls a brain.  [I presume it's OK if I address the poseur Gorojovsky 
in the manner, and tone, in which he addresses others who don't exactly jump 
on his bandwagon of patriotism...and lies?  I apologize if that's an 
unwarranted assumption and hope the list will bear with me].

I've have said concretely, with references to Marx and without sighs and 
references to great "crimes"  [see above reference to bandwagons and 
patriotism], all that needs to be said regarding the complexity of Marx's 
notions of "progress"  and "endorsement" of nationalism.  Nestor, covering 
himself with the names  Marx, Engels, Lenin Trotsky, like a naked man caught 
in the street covers himself with somebody else's jacket, adds nothing, not 
an iota to an understanding of the issues, of the real positions, and of the 
real difficulties in the positions expressed, considered, discussed, and 
finally adopted by Marx...and Engels.

Nothing is concrete for our great slandering reverse telescoper, because 
there are no definite social relations of production to the actual course of 
history-- none,  Bismarck is Lincoln,  Prussia is the North,  the North is 
national unity, Prussia is national unity,  the North is good, ergo Prussia 
is good, Prussia is supported, nationalism is good, separation of the 
specificity of the workers' struggle from the struggle for "national unity" 
is bad.

That's the sum total and meaning of the slanderer Gorojovsky's supposed 
Marxism.

Now I am one to think that things said offlist should remain offlist. 
Apparently our slandering, whining, poseur Gorojovsky does not agree.  He 
makes references to my menaces.  In the interests of truth in advertising 
let me explain.  In of our more recent go-rounds, around 11/27/09, the 
slandering whining Gorojovsky accused me of  supporting, facilitating, 
enabling "mass murder,"  or "mass murderers" by imperialism due to a 
disagreement I expressed with his uncritical endorsement of nationalism [see 
above reference to bandwagons, patriotism, and lies].  I think his exact 
words were "the Leftist objective allies of our mass murderers".    Les 
intervened to say the discussion should be offlist.  I agreed and responded 
to our greater whining Oz offlist, cautioning him to never say anything 
electronically he would not say to my face, and that if he ever got to NYC, 
to please look me up [as I would him if I ever get to Argentina], so I could 
offer him the opportunity to say such things to my face.    I don't think 
there's any doubt about what I meant, and intended by guaranteeing he 
wouldn't like my response.

So I couldn't care less whether or not the whining slanderer Gorojovsky sets 
foot anywhere in the world.  It's what he says and does that counts.  He 
wants to sell "woof tickets"?-- accusing people of being enablers of mass 
murder--- well, I'm buying.  And in cash.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Les Schaffer" <[email protected]>
To: "David Schanoes" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 2:17 PM
Subject: [Marxism] Asst. Moderator's Note (was A vial of poison ++)


> ======================================================================
> Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> ======================================================================
>

> On 1/17/2010 1:43 PM, Néstor Gorojovsky wrote:
>> This is just for the record
>>
>
> ok, so lets close this set of threads for now, i think Nestor has  had
> his say, anyone else, one last post each.
>
> Les
>


________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to