======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/299.php
Socialist Project - home        The   B u l l e t       Socialist Project - home
Socialist Project • E-Bulletin No. 299
January 23, 2010
Turkey: The Working Class
(Literally) Takes the Stage
Sungur Savran

After at least a decade and a half of stagnation, the working class 
movement of Turkey is making a great stride forward, thanks to the 
militant action of the workers of a now privatised former state economic 
enterprise, Tekel, the state monopoly of tobacco and alcoholic 
beverages. The resolute and tenacious fight put up by the 12,000 Tekel 
workers and their families has made an electrifying impact on major 
sections of the working class. Despite the dogged resistance of the top 
bureaucracy of the Türk-Is union confederation, the biggest of Turkey, 
to which the Tekel workers’ union is affiliated, the pressure for a 
general strike is mounting. Given the immense social and political 
contradictions Turkey has been subject to within the last few years, 
this new awakening of the proletariat adds still another tension to a 
society already torn apart by strife and dissension, but is susceptible 
to change the whole chemistry of the country and to create the 
possibility of a progressive resolution to the already existing problems.

The background to the Tekel conflict is the privatization of the 
company, completed in early 2009 despite strong resistance put up by the 
workers. British-American Tobacco, the new owners, sacked thousands of 
workers, who are now to be transferred to low-wage jobs in the public 
sector without any job security. To many Tekel workers, this means a 
complete destruction of the standard of life they had built over the 
years. What they are now fighting for is the preservation of their wage 
level and their status as permanent workers. Tekel is a big company 
whose factories were spread all around the country. Workers from 43 
factories and workplaces from 21 cities have been putting up a 
resolutely militant fight in the capital city of Ankara for 38 days now. 
They are living in makeshift tents outside Türk-Is headquarters in the 
freezing cold of winter. A clear sign of their resolution came through 
during the poll the union took a fortnight ago (called a “referendum” in 
Turkish union terminology), asking the workers whether to go on fighting 
or to quit. Although the workers had already two dozen days behind them, 
there was not a single vote to quit among those in Ankara and in the 
provinces the “go on fighting” vote reached the proportion of 99.6 %!

The timing of the struggle helped raise the solidarity action of the 
rest of the proletariat. For one thing, public employees (who are 
organised in union confederations of their own) had staged a sector-wide 
one-day strike at the end of November. Since public employees have no 
right to strike under Turkish legislation, the state tried to persecute 
some sectors, but especially state railroads employees started to fight 
back militantly in action that coincided with the beginning of the Tekel 
struggle. Other sectors of workers and public employees, especially 
firemen in Istanbul, also joined this new wave of militancy. Soon, 
unions and workers across the spectrum were displaying solidarity with 
the workers of Tekel. Even Türk-Is, whose leadership is divided between 
a strong right-wing faction and a minority soft left tendency, had to 
pay lip service to the heroic fight of the Tekel workers, declaring, but 
not consistently implementing, one-hour work stoppages every Friday.

The government’s intransigent attitude in the initial phase played into 
the hands of the Tekel workers. The ferocious attack by the police 
(using tear gas, pressured water and clubs) on the workers on the fourth 
day of the struggle created a backlash not only within the working class 
but also among the people at large. In the face of growing support for 
the workers, the government felt it had to make some concessions, but 
these were definitely of a token nature. The semi-Islamist (and entirely 
neoliberal) AKP government feels it cannot yield to the demands of the 
Tekel workers simply because this will have repercussions in other 
sectors, such as sugar and energy, where privatizations are in the pipeline.

Workers Revolt Against the Türk-Is Bureaucracy

The quasi-unanimity of the workers in the union referendum gave a clear 
mandate to the union to step up the fight. Thus began the second stage 
of the struggle. The entire work force of twelve thousand was brought to 
Ankara along with their families and held overnight vigils throughout 72 
hours, culminating in a demonstration organised by the Türk-Is 
confederation. Close to 100,000 workers participated in the march and 
demonstration, the biggest such event since 1999. The crowd frequently 
chanted slogans that supported a general strike. The President of 
Türk-Is, a certain Mustafa Kumlu, catapulted into this position by the 
governing AKP, made an anodyne speech, simply lamenting the situation 
the entire working class finds itself in and saying nothing concrete 
about the way forward.

The indignation this created pushed the Tekel workers to mount on the 
stage built for the purpose of the demonstration. From that moment on, 
for close to an hour, there ensued a tug-of-war between the thousands of 
Tekel workers and the thousands of members of socialist groups (union 
contingents had already left the square), on the one hand, and union 
bureaucrats of different ranks, on the other. The workers repeated 
unceasingly a slogan that had originally borne the mark of the socialist 
left: “General strike, general resistance!” The bureaucrats, for their 
part, tried to bring the workers down from the podium and get them to 
disband and go home, alternatively cajoling and threatening them. 
Finally, a unionist from the Türk-Is leadership promised to take the 
demand for a general strike to leadership bodies, to which the crowd 
duly replied by another slogan: “Kumlu has to come and promise us a 
general strike!” This paralysed the bureaucrats. But in the end, a 
clever bureaucrat had the idea of threatening the workers with a police 
attack – after all, the “official” demonstration was over and the police 
disposed of the legal right to disperse the crowd. Thus came to an end 
this unusual public revolt of the workers against the union bureaucracy. 
Whatever the outcome in the coming days, this single episode has placed 
the Tekel fight in the annals of class struggle in Turkey. This was the 
first time when workers openly revolted against the bureaucracy during 
mass action, which of course will send shivers through every bureaucrat 
in future actions of a similar dimension.

This revolt heartened workers in other sectors and widened the fissure 
within the confederation bureaucracy. Now, bureaucrats of all stripes 
are talking about a general strike. (It is perhaps in order to point out 
that general strikes are outlawed in Turkey, a country that has almost 
no established tradition of this kind of action. So a general strike is 
a much more explosive event in the Turkish context than in many other 
countries.) As of the 38th day of the struggle, Türk-Is has today come 
together with other workers’ and public employees’ unions to issue a 
warning to the government: Either do something by Tuesday the 26th or we 
will have to go on a “solidarity strike.” It seems we are finally on a 
descending slope toward a general strike (by whatever name it is 
eventually called), a very radical move by Turkish standards.

Currently some 140 of the workers are on hunger strike, with thousands 
more wishing to join in but prevented from doing so by the unionists and 
sympathising doctors, who fear that, after close to 40 days of 
exhaustion in the freezing cold of Ankara, many a worker might already 
be in bad health.

The Fourth Dimension

Turkey has lately been shaken by powerful contradictions that have 
brought the country to the edge of the precipice. Three major 
contradictions tear the country apart. A first is the ongoing struggle 
for the repartition of surplus-value and economic power between the two 
wings of the bourgeoisie, the dominant Westernist-secular wing and the 
ascending Islamist wing, has reached the proportions of a political 
civil war, bordering, in recent months, a military conflict on several 
occasions. Another is the quarter-of-a-century old Kurdish war has now 
apparently entered a new stage. All throughout the years of guerrilla 
warfare waged by the PKK (Kurdistan Workers’ Party) against the Turkish 
army, relative calm reigned within society itself. But now evidence 
mounts that there is a growing danger that Turkish chauvinism against 
the Kurds, fanned consciously by the state and all of the bourgeois 
political forces, may result in the lynching or wholesale massacre of 
Kurds, possibly leading on to ethnic civil war, this despite the 
so-called “Kurdish overture” of the government or perhaps because of its 
restricted nature. And, finally, in the background lurches the prospect 
of Turkey becoming more closely a part of the U.S. war drive, be it in 
Afghanistan (where Turkey already has troops, but no combat mission), 
Iraq (where some of the former duties of the now withdrawing U.S. troops 
may be turned over to Turkey), Iran (whose alleged nuclear armament 
efforts seriously disturb the secular Turkish army) or Georgia (in its 
conflict with Russia). This prospect has direct bearing on Turkish 
domestic politics and is conditioned by the other contradictions in its 
turn.

Under the stress of these three sets of contradictions, Turkey has 
become a powder-keg. It is in this bleak context that the awakening 
militancy of the working class should be situated. We have been saying 
all along that it is a new class struggle front that alone will create 
the potential to resolve in a progressive direction the many 
contradictions that beset Turkey. This claim seems ripe for testing.

The most encouraging sign in the Tekel struggle is the fact that Turks 
and Kurds are struggling together in comradely fashion. For Tekel has 
factories both in the Turkish dominated Western part of the country and 
in the tobacco-rich Eastern part populated by the Kurds (properly 
speaking Turkish Kurdistan). At the beginning, the Turkish workers were 
as infested as the rest of the Turkish people with hostility against the 
Kurds. It was precisely for this reason that many leftists under the 
effect of identity politics originally kept their distance from the 
Tekel struggle. We have defended the idea that under the transformative 
impact of militant class struggle, the Tekel workers were bound to shed 
this attitude in favour of a “fraternity of peoples,” as the left in 
Turkey calls solidarity between Turks and Kurds. This is precisely what 
is slowly happening. An abundance of evidence gathered through the 
experience of militants on the ground clearly shows that the attitude of 
even the most right-wing Turks, including some who used to sympathise 
with the openly anti-Kurd fascist party, has changed radically. It is 
now commonplace to hear many a Turkish Tekel worker say, “Were it not 
for the Kurds, we couldn’t have come this far!”

The Tekel struggle also reorders society along class lines. Up until 
very recently, Turkish society (excluding the Kurds that is) was divided 
in its sympathy clearly between the two camps of the bourgeoisie. Now a 
distinct working class position is overtaking these two allegiances.

Turkey seems to be entering a new and promising stage. If the Tekel 
struggle can be generalised, and it now seems there are distinct 
possibilities for this, a very different conjuncture will be born. If, 
on the other hand, the bureaucracy betrays the Tekel workers into 
defeat, the working class as a whole will stand to lose from this.

Sungur Savran is editor of the newspaper Isci Mucadelesi (Workers' 
Struggle) in Istanbul, Turkey (www.iscimucadelesi.net).

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to