======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


(Halle teaches music at Bard while Danner teaches some kind of bullshit 
about humanitarian intervention. After Kovel's firing, Halle is the only 
real leftist still teaching there.)

Mark Danner's Choice
by John Halle

A long standing staple of Fox News discourse claims that liberalism in 
the academy holds sway as a kind of semi-official ideology.  This view 
is largely correct,  though it should be kept in mind that it is the 
liberalism targeted in recent denunciations by Adolph Reed and Chris 
Hedges, not the "radical leftism" of teabaggers and other fantasists of 
the right.

A more or less paradigmatic example of the former can be found in Mark 
Danner's recent NY Times Op-Ed "To Heal Haiti, Look to History" which 
would be quickly been picked up at commondreams.org, Democracy Now! and 
grit.tv among other sites.

That the piece would be promoted by web organs of the authentic-as 
opposed to liberal- left was, at least superficially reasonable in that 
Danner's (or for that matter anyone's) minimally accurate thumb nail 
sketch of Haitian history could not fail but to deliver a stridently 
anti-imperialist message: Haiti has functioned as "a state built for 
predation and plunder", starting with the complete eradication of its 
native population, to its establishment as the most brutal of slave 
states, to its functioning in the 20th century as a paradigmatic 
kleptocracy presided over by a string of vicious dictators serving 
themselves and the interests of foreign capital.

Danner's bill of particulars, many of these laid on our doorstep, is of 
course regrettable, disturbing, and even damning and as such provides an 
opportunity for the displays of teeth gnashing and garment rending which 
liberals can be relied on to engage in.  Their doing so requires, 
however, that one condition is met: that these instances are all safely 
in the past.

Thus, what is predictably missing in Danner's discussion is anything 
other than the vaguest allusion to the recent history of Haiti. And it 
is this history which is largely responsible for the almost 
inconceivable scale of the devastation caused by what would otherwise be 
a major, but by no means unprecedented disaster.

The relevant cause, as is described in the works of Robert Fatton, is 
demographic: for the past three decades the city of Port au Prince has 
grown from approximately 300,000 to over 2.5 million inhabitants. 
Lacking the infrastructure required to support this population and the 
financial wherewithal to develop it, most residents of the capital lived 
in slums lacking the most basic sanitation facilities, with only 
sporadic access to safe drinking water and frequently subjected to 
protracted encounters with what NGO's somewhat euphemistically refer to 
as "food insecurity".  Moreover, it hardly needs to be mentioned, 
building codes were non existent.

It was eminently predictable from these initial conditions that a 7.0 
Richter Scale seismic event would materialize as it did with countless 
thousands buried under rubble, those able to extract themselves doing so 
in a weakened condition sometimes literally dying of thirst or through 
opportunistic infections.

If we want to understand as opposed to merely wring our hands about this 
epic tragedy, we need to inquire into why these conditions obtained. 
What accounted for the massive influx into Port au Prince from the 
rural, agricultural areas?  Danner indirectly alludes to the crucial in 
his proposal to "America (to) throw open its markets to Haitian 
agricultural produce and manufactured goods, broadening and making 
permanent the provisions of a promising trade bill negotiated in 2008."

Danner has this exactly backward.  As Fatton and others have noted, it 
is not the failure of the U.S. to open its markets, but rather the 
converse which is directly implicated in the catastrophe- which is to 
say two decades of extortionate neo-liberal trade pacts which required 
Haiti to open its markets to U.S. goods.  Chief among these are heavily 
subsidized U.S. agricultural products, most notably rice.  These were 
dumped on Haiti with similar results to that in much of the third world: 
  Farmers unable to compete with cheap imports were driven off their 
land, selling out to multinational agribusiness and developers, 
initiating an exodus to the cities offering the prospect of employment 
in manufacturing sector albeit at near starvation wages.

This is now an old story applying to much of the third world and told in 
numerous places, most comprehensively in Mike Davis's Planet of Slums. 
And so it is reasonable to ask why does Danner fail to mention it?

The answer is necessarily a matter of speculation though it is probably 
not too cynical to assume that Danner is well aware that his reputation 
as a "serious" thinker on these and related matters in establishment 
circles requires that these obvious truths be passed over unacknowledged.

A parade examples of a fall from grace occasioned by failing to respect 
the boundaries of acceptable discourse is provided by former Times 
Middle East bureau chief Hedges whose rigorous, informed and brilliant 
recent works, or "rants"-as they are described when insiders even bother 
to recognize them, are now relegated to wilds of the internet.

Danner's perches at the Council on Foreign Relation, the Century 
Foundation and the Pacific Council for World Affairs and his access to 
mainstream "print" media (not to mention the substantial fees which 
accompany these) will remain secure so long as he respects the limits 
which Hedges transgressed-as will his ultimate legacy as one more 
apologist for imperial plunder, albeit of the kinder and gentler 
neo-liberal variety.

If it is to be otherwise, he will need to join Hedges on "the dark side" 
as it were, by developing the capacity to name those individuals as well 
as the system (namely capitalism) which is responsible for the 
conditions which made widespread death and destruction, in Haiti and 
much of the rest of the third world, inevitable.









________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to