======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


1)

Imperialism is still out there and thus, the national question remains 
unsettled.

No imperialist nation, under normal conditions, would admit that foreign 
companies hire local paramilitaries to deal with the country´s own 
working class. Serious bourgeoisies, owners of the States of those 
countries, reserve for themselves the right to exploit their own workers 
and particularly that of eventually killing them.

Colombia, on the contrary, of course _does_ accept what no imperialist 
bourgeoisie accepts.

Now, what does it say to us?

It tells us that in the eventuality that some Colombian bourgeois 
politician or military decided that the Colombian workers are exclusive 
prey for the Colombian bourgeoisie, which is unfathomably weaker than 
the US bourgeoisie, I would bet that most workers and most unionists 
would gather around him/her and support him/her. Because without 
contractors such as Dole, Chiquita or similars, the paramilitaries lose 
a good deal of their resource base. And if a Leftist would denounce 
those unionists for "not pursuing the independence of the working class" 
he would receive a glorious "shot in cul" (bootkicking in the ass) by 
those unionists and working class. They would be left speaking nonsense 
to no-one, decade after decade, and those Marxists who want to build an 
alternative leadership for the national movement, against the hegemony 
of the local bourgeoisie, will have to deal, among other issues, with 
that bad name which will of necessity fall on socialism...

Issues between the workers of a semicolonial country and the 
bourgeoisies of that semicolonial country are easier to bend to the 
workers´ side than issues between those same workers and the imperialist 
nations, represented by the monopoly branch of their bourgeoisies. 
Workers understand this instantly. Any "Leftist" who forgets this is 
unworthy of such self-attached name. But such is life.

BTW, when I write "semicolonial" I am fully aware that we are not living 
in 1910. I usually prefer the term "Third World", particularly in its 
original sense which equated its situation with that of the "Third 
Estate" (Tiers État) in France, 1789. And of course under the 
"developmentist" political banner, the bourgeoisies in Third World 
countries tend to weld to imperialist powers rather than to their own 
peoples. But the structural situation of semicolonial exploitation and 
pillage does not change due to this.

Recent developments in ecological economy have offered a material way to 
show this. It has been estimated that each average USAmerican citizen 
requires the resources of 11 "global hectares" to live (that is the 
"ecological imprint" of the average US citizen today). This means that 
the whole population of the United States of America lives off the 
resources of 3.3 billion "global hectares". Which boils down to
33 million square kilometers. The US of America (Alaska excluded, Hawaii 
not even considered) cover some 8 million square kilometers. Where do 
the remaining 25 million come from? And by what means are they obtained?

Not by peaceful trading of equivalents. Even when all the bourgeoisies 
in the Third World are absolutely co-opted (which is not exactly the 
case), the colonial situation remains. That is why I speak of 
"semicolonial" countries.

*** *** ***

Servicio poco ordinario

ARGENPRESS, Argentina - viernes 29 de enero de 2010

Colombia: Asì fue el “servicio paramilitar integral ” para Dole y 
Chiquita http://www. argenpress. 
info/2010/01/colombia-asi-fue-el-servicio. html

El periodista sueco Dick Emanuelsson, quien ha vivido en Colombia y ha 
cubierto el tema colombiano durante 30 años con varios extensos 
reportajes en las zonas bananeras de Urabá y Ciénaga, analiza en este 
artículo especial para ARGENPRESS las confesiones juradas del jefe 
paramilitar Carlos Tijeras que da otra visión diferente de la defensa de 
Chiquita que en 2004 admitió haber pagado al paramilitarismo 1,7 
millones de dólares como extorsión o por proteger sus empleados. Tijeras 
relata que los paramilitares daban todo un paquete de “seguridad ” a 
Chiquita y Dole. El paramilitarismo fue una Aseguradora armada en las 
zonas bananeras que incluso sentenciaba y cumplía las sentencias que en 
el caso del “juez ” Carlos Tijeras significaba la orden de matar a 500 
civiles, entre ellos el presidente sindical de los obreros bananeros, 
José Güette, quien los últimos días de noviembre de 2000 guió a 
Emanuelsson en las fincas bananeras de Chiquita y otras empresas 
bananeras en la región bananera de Ciénaga.

“Me han dicho que Chiquita ha aseverado que le dio fondos a las AUC,pero 
lo que hizo fue bajo coerción y como una forma de extorsión. También he 
oído que Dole sostiene que nunca entregó fondos. Las dos aseveraciones 
son absolutamente falsas. De hecho, mi acuerdo con Chiquita y Dole fue 
para prestarles seguridad total y otros servicios ”.

En una confesión franca y abierta, el ex jefe paramilitar “Carlos 
Tijeras ” afirma que el trato con la Aseguradora Armada paramilitar que 
Dole y Chiquita contrataban en Colombia para solucionar “problemas ” era 
equivalente, en muchos casos, a la muerte para la persona “identificada 
” como “guerrillero ” o “miliciano ”.

Sostiene que Chiquita no dice la verdad cuando afirma que fue victima de 
extorsión. El sindicato bananero Sintrainagro en la región Ciénaga, 
cobraba diez por ciento de la cuota sindical de los miembros, que fue 
destinado a los paramilitares. Estos colocaban o comprobaban los 
dirigentes sindicales en sus puestos y así controlaba el sindicato. “Yo 
era el gobernante de hecho del área”, proclama el ex jefe paramilitar.

Según sus declaraciones las empresas transnacionales Dole y Chiquita no 
solamente pagaban a los paramilitares tres centavos por cada caja de 
banano exportada desde Colombia, sino que los llamaban para “solucionar 
problemas” en las plantaciones del banano,equivalente de “neutralizar ” 
el problema.



________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to