======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


I second Louis' compliment on this post, I would love to hear more about the
situation in Greece, particularly SYRIZA.

http://socialistworker.org/2010/02/10/european-capitalisms-weak-link

THE GREEK economy is the "weak link" in the capitalist chain of the European
Union (EU). The term--used by the revolutionary Lenin to describe Russia in
1917--was initially used in Greece by the radical left. But now, it's in
broad use, even by Prime Minister Georgios Papandreou Jr., who, as head of
the social democratic party PASOK, took office after the collapse of the
right-wing New Democracy party in elections held in October 2009.

Greece isn't the only weak link, however. Other EU countries are under
enormous pressure from the economic crisis. The European press not so
affectionately refers to them as the PIIGS (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece
and Spain).

The crisis is particularly sharp in Greece, which has an annual budget
deficit equal to 12.5 percent of gross domestic product (GDP)--which is four
times the 3 percent limit mandated under the EU's Maastricht Treaty. Greek
public debt stands at 130 percent of GDP, which is double the EU limit.
Thus, articles in the European press point to the likelihood of national
bankruptcy in Greece.

Politicians and the media blame the crisis on the supposedly generous Greek
welfare state, which, they claim, must be slashed to bring the budget under
control. In fact, the situation is the direct result of the neoliberal
policies that were followed by the social democratic governments of the
1990s, and even more so by the right-wing government of Prime Minister
Kostas Karamanlis, as the leader of the New Democracy (ND) party between
2004 and 2009.

For many years, Greek public finances were based exclusively on the taxation
of the wage-earning population and the lower middle class. Greece has one of
the lowest corporate taxes among EU countries, but even these low taxes
aren't collected properly--corporate tax evasion is at record highs. Even
the sales tax isn't fully collected by the government, but is left in
business hands to further raise their profits.

At the same time, Greece has one of the highest taxes on wages among the EU
countries. What's more, employers and even the state--the biggest
employer--have stopped paying their contributions to pension funds, creating
a shortfall of more than 10 billion euros annually.

These factors are sufficient to explain the bad situation of public finances
up until now. Today, of course, conditions have been made even worse with
the outbreak of the economic crisis that hit Greek capitalism in its most
crucial sectors. For example, the bursting of the real estate bubble brought
construction--a sector considered the locomotive of the economy--to a
complete standstill.

The crisis hit particularly hard in the tourism and shipping industries. And
the supposedly strong Greek banks--used to acting as the dominant players in
the greater Balkans region--were forced to admit not only that there is no
more gold in the Balkan "El Dorado," but that many of their old speculative
enterprises have also turned toxic.

The government budget problems were made even worse last year by the
decision of the former Greek government to follow its European counterparts
in carrying out a colossal bailout for corporations at the onset of the
crisis.

To understand why, consider the numbers. The Papandreou government today
wants to extract 25 billion euros from the people over the next three years
in order to reduce the budget deficit from 12.5 percent of GDP to 3 percent.
Yet in one night only last year, former Prime Minister Karamanlis made
available for the support of Greek banks a colossal total of 28 billion
euros! Similar support programs were speedily put together for the tourist
interests and other capitalist groups.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

TO PAY for these bailouts, the Greek government has been forced to turn to
massive borrowing. To meet its financing needs for 2010 alone, the
government has to sell bonds--that is, borrow--some 55 billion euros.

Investors are skeptical that the government can repay those loans. Thus, at
the beginning of January, a report by Germany's Deutsche Bank on the
potential risks of government bonds sent interest rates on loans to the
Greek government through the roof. On January 25, with the first issue of
Greek bonds for a loan of 5 billion euros, there was surprising interest,
with offers for almost five times the asking amount. However, the bonds
carry a stiff interest rate of 6.2 percent, which, together with the
bankers' commission, raised the cost of the loan to 8 percent.

The head of the bank consortium that organized this robbery was none other
than Deutsche Bank, the same outfit that warned the world about the
riskiness of the investment.

All this highlights the fact that "servicing the public debt" in Greece is
nothing than a way to rob the people, depriving them of badly needed
resources in order to serve the interests of the banks and all the other
loan sharks of the " international market."

This giveaway to the banks is being organized by the PASOK government that
came to power in October 2009. PASOK was elected as a result of a campaign
that promised resistance to a wage freeze proposed by then-Prime Minister
Karamanlis.

Yet in the few months that PASOK's Papandreou has been in office, he has
made clear that he is committed to pushing through an austerity program even
harsher than that of his right-wing predecessor--which means an all-out
attack on labor rights and social gains. This government aims not only to
freeze wages, but to actually cut pay in the public sector, thereby opening
the way for bosses to do the same thing in the private sector.

A key aim of the Papandreou government is to significantly reduce employment
in the public sector by laying off big proportions of temporary workers (who
are employed in place of badly needed permanent workers) and hiring just one
new employee for every five (!) who retire. This program completely ignores
the dramatic jump in unemployment, which is already estimated at 16 percent.

Overall, Papandreou is implementing a program of drastic cuts in social
spending that threaten an already resource-starved public health care and
education system with total collapse. At the same time, the government wants
to turn public pensions and the social security system into a private and
semi-private system. It also plans a broad program of privatization of parts
of the public sector, including ports, energy, water, etc.

That's not all. Papandreou aims to substantially raise taxes for working
people and the lower middle classes, without touching the profits of the
rich--especially big businesses and the banks.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

ONCE AGAIN, we have before us a social democratic government with a program
of harsh neoliberal policies. Papandreou aims to reduce the deficit over the
next three years in order to, he says, "rehabilitate the confidence of the
international market in the country."

The government's main asset in enforcing these policies is PASOK's strength
in the trade unions. This explains the turn in ruling class political
support toward PASOK. The industrialists and the bankers realized that the
right had exhausted its credibility with the people. Thus, they looked to
social democracy, providing unprecedented support to the PASOK via the
corporate mass media.

Another element in PASOK's favor is the paralysis of the opposition New
Democracy party, which has been pressured into providing unconditional
support to PASOK's economic and social economic program. In order to rally
any popular support at all, New Democracy has taken racist and nationalist
positions to appeal to its hard core--a traditional conservative audience.
(It should be added here that the recently elected leader of New Democracy
attempted 15 years ago to found an extreme right nationalist party.)

With the right incapable of effective opposition, Papandreou has a free hand
to sell his austerity program. In his speeches, he often uses the punch
line: "change or sink." By that, he means that the country must turn in a
neoliberal direction--that the balance of forces between capital and labor
must be tipped towards the benefit of the rich "so that the country can
avoid bankruptcy."

Under this banner, the PASOK government used its first 100 days in office to
reverse Papandreou's election program. People were stunned--and public
discontent is already being expressed in many ways.

As this article is being written, protesting farmers, using tractors and
heavy equipment, have set up blockades in 30 different places along the main
freeways, demanding fair prices for their products. Public-sector temporary
employees, under the imminent threat of losing their jobs, are organizing
strikes in many services.

That's only the beginning. Despite the betrayal by the social democratic
leadership of the unions, it's certain that there will be mass resistance to
Papandreou's program. That's exactly why "international investors" are
expressing strong doubts about the government's ability to impose its
"reforms." In recalling Greece's youth uprising of 2008, a major European
paper wrote: "In this country, there exists a very low tolerance to
modernizing reforms and very high tolerance towards radical protest."

But the struggle is not going to be easy. This time, the ruling elites know
very well that the defeat of their austerity policies will have immense
consequences. It's no accident that there are a growing number of
establishment voices demanding a "national salvation" government run by both
PASOK and New Democracy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

TO OVERTURN Papandreou's program, we will need a serious escalation of these
struggles.

The ex-chairman of the parliamentary group of SYRIZA (Coalition of Radical
Left), Alekos Alavanos, spoke of the need for a new "worker's December." He
was referring to a broad uprising like the youth revolt of December
2008--only this time, the struggle must be centered in the labor movement.
That could provide the continuity, demands and politics necessary to bring
victory for the resistance movement. This slogan--for a "worker's
December"--has become increasingly popular, reaching even the pages of the
mainstream press.

The fightback must also have a European dimension. The case of Greece is
proof that it is impossible to defend workers' rights and social gains
without confronting the European Union's policies that prioritize cutting
deficits and debts, no matter how severe the impact on the people.

In that sense, Greece could indeed prove to be "the weak link" of European
capitalism--not only financially, but also politically. Resistance in Greece
could be the signal for a new round of major labor struggles and strikes in
Europe.

It should be clear that our goal can't be achieved by mass social resistance
alone. The situation also demands a political struggle, in which the forces
of the radical left will have to play a crucial role. An important factor is
SYRIZA, a coalition in which our organization DEA (International Workers'
Left) has participated from the beginning.

Currently, SYRIZA has electoral support of about 5 percent of voters. A
crucial and rich debate is taking place inside SYRIZA about: (a) for the
need of radical left-wing policy to meet the challenges of this critical
period, and (b) the need for SYRIZA to become a democratic and fighting
organization that's capable of supporting the coming struggles. DEA,
together with other forces of the revolutionary left that participate in
SYRIZA, has focused our attention on this debate.

Whether in Greece, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Ireland or elsewhere, one of
these "weak links" has to get broken. The task now is to open the way for
mass demands for changes that meet the needs of working people and youth,
rather than satisfying the corporate greed of bankers and industrialists.
________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to