======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


I have a few more things to say at this point about the tragedy at University 
of Alabama, Huntsville. That situation at this point is publicly  awash in the 
usual, often breathless media "revelations" about Dr Amy Bishop, the shooter. 
Anything real or alleged in her background is tossed in all directions, sans 
any critical analysis: a gun incident long ago when she was 19 or so in which 
her brother died but at which no charges were pressed and which was labeled 
then as an accident; the fact that years later, she and her husband, as well as 
a number of other people similarly situated, were questioned about a bomb plot 
involving as target an academic supervisor; other recollections with 
speculative grounding given to voracious and un-critical reporters. It seems 
clear she did an acceptable job at UAH; in some dimensions, an exceptional one.

It's been difficult to reach relevant search engine pages on certain internal 
UAH officialdom and policy matters since a number of those pages seem no longer 
available at this point. One of the university's spokespersons in this affair 
-- and UAH is doing its best to assure the public that Dr Bishop was treated 
fairly -- is a man who I knew back in the University of North Dakota days and 
who I have no reason to trust.

With a little intricate computer searching, I finally found the school's 
promotion and tenure policies.  Nothing too unusual there -- about standard.  
In healthy academic institutions those policies work more or less OK, in others 
they do not.  

And a goodly number of higher educational institutions in both public and 
private sectors are not, at this point, healthy.

Lost for the time being, at least, in all of this dust and smoke -- and in the 
very real all-around tragedy itself -- is the Tenure Issue.  A few days ago, I 
posted this from the New York Times which quotes Dr Bishop's spouse:

_______________________________


This strikes me as a reasonably inclusive piece from the NYT.  It contains, 
among other things, these telling sentences:

"Mr. Anderson said that months ago, the university administration overruled a 
successful appeal of the decision to deny Dr. Bishop tenure in spring 2009. 
"She won her appeal," he said, "and the provost canned it." 

The university has declined to elaborate on the details of Dr. Bishop's tenure 
application, saying only that she was denied last spring and that she could 
stay at the university only until the end of this academic year. Even if a 
faculty member successfully appeals a tenure denial, the final decision rests 
with the administration."

________________________________________

I haven't heard anything more about this dimension -- but UAH has not denied 
this.   Dr Bishop did file suit about the negative outcome of her tenure appeal 
and one of the legal pegs re the suit [and the appeal itself] was the fact 
that, after the official deadline for submission of her tenure application 
materials, she had attempted to include two academic papers she'd recently 
done.  She was told she couldn't add them.

About all I can contribute on that is that when I filed for promotion to Full 
Professor at University of North Dakota, [I had earlier received "early tenure" 
based on my many years of prior college/university teaching], I included a 
statement to the effect that my book, Jackson Mississippi, was due to be 
reprinted with a brief update by me, via a well established textbook publisher. 
 In the midst of my "promotion process", the actual and tangible reprint, a 
large paperback with an attractive cover, arrived.  I wasn't planning to toss 
it in the on-going hopper but did mention it to one of the higher level 
committee members.  "Put it in right now," I was told.  And so I did.  I got 
the promotion. I suspect that slight, flexible modification of time-line rules 
is par in many higher ed settings

[A year later, the state legislature voted a modest appropriation increase for 
North Dakota's colleges and universities but it was overturned by a state-wide 
referendum.  Caught up in fiscal crises, the internal atmosphere at UND became 
jungle-like -- pronto. And that's an interesting story in its own right.]

What do I think?  I think Dr Bishop got badly shafted.

And I say again that, if any good is going to emerge from this all-around 
tragedy in Alabama, it will lie in a searching examination of higher ed tenure 
and promotion policies nationally.

And a great deal of tangible reformation thereof.

Yours, Hunter


HUNTER GRAY [HUNTER BEAR/JOHN R SALTER JR] Mi'kmaq /St. Francis 
Abenaki/St. Regis Mohawk 
Protected by Na´shdo´i´ba´i´ 
and Ohkwari' 

Check out our Hunterbear website Directory http://hunterbear.org/directory.htm 
For Black History Month, five of our many Southern civil rights history links:
[Each page has several pieces]

http://hunterbear.org/a_piece_of__the_scrapbook.htm

http://hunterbear.org/Woolworth%20Sitin%20Jackson.htm

http://hunterbear.org/most_sweeping_anti.htm

http://hunterbear.org/first.htm

http://hunterbear.org/NORTH%20CAROLINA_OUR%20SUCCESSFUL%20BLACK%20BELT%20MOVEMENT.htm

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to