======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


Once again the CPUSA demonstrates its organizational bankruptcy by 
constantly rewriting and redeploying its idiotic line on the "defeat of 
the ultra-right." When will the current leadership clique actually just 
come out and admit that it is a strictly liquidationist tendency? When 
will they admit that they're now further to the right than Browder was?

I was actually impressed (NB: it doesn't take much) by a few of the 
pre-convention documents in PA recently (especially Thomas Kenny's 
article "Tailing the Democrats and Forsaking Struggle"). Clearly it 
shows that there is a core within the CPUSA that is seriously 
dissatisfied with the Webb leadership, its blind opportunism, its 
national chauvinism, and its bizarre line on Obama that flies in the 
face of all "facts of the streets" in the US today.

It is amazing to see that the party leadership still thinks in terms of 
how to "win the masses" -- virtually every strategic decision taken by 
CPUSA in the last 50 years has isolated them and split them from the 
masses. This ludicrous document shows us how out of touch the party is 
-- not only does it argue that we are in the "anti-ultra right" stage 
(which flies completely in the face of the sharpening class demands of 
the dispossessed immediately present in the US today), it suggests that 
we must move from this towards an "anti-monopoly" stage.

In 2010, in a country where the poorest workers, undocumented 
immigrants, and the lowest semi-permanently unemployed strata are being 
dramatically pushed into political motion by their dispossession, how 
the CPUSA can actually see an "anti-monopoly" line as meaningful is 
insane. The union movement is in a long and devastating retreat. There 
is no vast "state sector" in which to struggle. The political vision of 
the CPUSA is organized around a situation that has not existed in the US 
for 80 years. The demands of the US poor are increasingly class demands, 
and the party's inability to think outside of the popular front model of 
supporting the "progressive" fraction of the capitalist class is going 
to condemn it to total irrelevance in the current moment (if it isn't 
already there).

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to