====================================================================== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. ======================================================================
DW: David S. perhaps I overstated your view...I'm sure you and Louis are opposed to the use of coal as a means of generating electricity AND that you are aware of at least the bigger problems with its use. _______ The more you try to defend what you said, the more fucked up it gets. You didn't say that Louis and I didn't oppose coal as a means of generating electricity. You said Louis and I did not give a flying fuck, a rat's ass, about the deaths caused by the production of coal. That's not an overstatement, that's a slanderous pile of steaming bullshit. Have I made myself clear as to what part of your epistle I take exception to? The part where you accuse Louis and me of not at all objecting to the death of coal miners. I don't care what Louis said or didn't say about wind power and solar power, or hamster power. I made a slightly humorous remark about your ridiculous comparison of nuclear radiation to chocolate, and you respond with bullshit slander. I can think of some things stupider than advocating nuclear power for electricity generation rather than advocating for the socialization of utilities, but, given the fact that GE and the energy companies who have brought us everything from PBCs in the Hudson River to the coal waste water disaster in Tennessee will be the same companies designing, managing and operating the nuclear plants, I can't think of many things stupider. Should I repeat this one more time? OK, I'll just copy and paste it below =================================== DW: David S. perhaps I overstated your view...I'm sure you and Louis are opposed to the use of coal as a means of generating electricity AND that you are aware of at least the bigger problems with its use. _______ The more you try to defend what you said, the more fucked up it gets. You didn't say that Louis and I didn't oppose coal as a means of generating electricity. You said Louis and I did not give a flying fuck, a rat's ass, about the deaths caused by the production of coal. That's not an overstatement, that's a slanderous pile of steaming bullshit. Have I made myself clear as to what part of your epistle I take exception to? The part where you accuse Louis and me of not at all objecting to the death of coal miners. I don't care what Louis said or didn't say about wind power and solar power, or hamster power. I made a slightly humorous remark about your ridiculous comparison of nuclear radiation to chocolate, and you respond with bullshit slander. I can think of some things stupider than advocating nuclear power for electricity generation rather than advocating for the socialization of utilities, but, given the fact that GE and the energy companies who have brought us everything from PBCs in the Hudson River to the coal waster disaster in Tennessee will be the same companies designing, managing and operating the nuclear plants, I can't think of many things stupider. Should I repeat this one more time? ----- Original Message ----- From: "DW" <[email protected]> .net ________________________________________________ Send list submissions to: [email protected] Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
