====================================================================== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. ======================================================================
Hmm. . . Didn't the Narodniks use that term about themselves, as some ultras did in the French Revolution? On the other: I am sympathetic to one's aims and not to the other's aims, but I don't see why blowing up French cafes in Algers is not "terrorist" while smashing into the World Trade Center is "terrorist." By which definition? > We use it here in the same way that the Marxists have always used > it, as a way to describe the Narodniks et al. It is not a question > of morality but of strategy and tactics. For example, nobody here > would describe the FLN as terrorist when it set off bombs in > Algeria. On the other hand, the attacks on 9/11 were. > ________________________________________________ Send list submissions to: [email protected] Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
