======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


 Artesian wrote:

 >" ... like all that stuff
 >"proving"... Tukhachevsky planned a military coup with the 
 >aid of German paratroopers.... 

 To which Grover responded:

 >Yes, that stuff and a lot of other stuff (not paratroopers, 
 >though not that I've seen). It's not a question of "belief" 
 >or "disbelief". It's a question of evidence.

Are you saying that you have the evidence proving
comrade Tukhachevsky was a traitor? This I would like
to see and since this is in the realm of the verboten 
here, please send me the references off list. I am aware 
of  the allegations and the activity of German Intelligence 
via the Czechs but nothing I have seen is credible. 
Marshall Zhukov was not alone in the highest ranks of 
the RKKA (and then the Soviet Army)in believing that 
Tukhachevsky was, always, a loyal soldier of the Soviet Union 
whose skill was sorely missed in confronting the Wehrmacht.

As to a critical re-evaluation of this crucial era, 
there is certainly nothing wrong with that. The Cold War 
construction of "totalitarianism" is a lie told for political 
purposes and I believe scholars such as Robert Thurston
(Life and Terror in Stalin's Russia, 1934-1941) are doing a 
very credible job of unraveling this myth. Now if someone 
would inform the tea baggers that our center-right 
president can't be both a communist and a Nazi.


________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to