====================================================================== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. ======================================================================
In which she makes an observation about Althusser and what she calls facts and which I called data in my reply to "Rethinking Imperialism" (http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/critiquing-a-critique-of-lenin/)--but it amounts to the same thing: Of course, some contemporary French essayists do criticize the United States from time to time. “Le Monde des livres” listed some of these – Pierre Bourdieu, Alain Badiou, Slavoj Zizek, Antonio Negri, et alia – as proof that the French have such great intellectuals that they have no need to hear what Chomsky has to say. Even though they are of course very different from each other, certain differences between contemporary French philosophers on the one hand and Chomsky on the other deserve mention. First and foremost is the question of facts. Chomsky’s criticism is laden with facts, a substance that seems to elicit ennui among contemporary French thinkers. No doubt the importance of the essay in the French educational system has bred a world of “philosophers” whose skill at manipulating fact-free ideas was the guarantee of a distinguished career. Louis Althusser confessed as much in his autobiography, admitting that he not only knew few facts but that he knew few works of philosophy – but he had learned how to synthesize. This raises the question of the social usefulness of such philosophy. If the social object is to entertain, then the French school reaches its goal – mystification is often far more entertaining than straightforward descriptions of reality. On the other hand, if the object is to help readers reach their own understanding of reality, especially political reality, then their first need is to be provided with the basic relevant facts, which most people do not have time to ascertain through their own research. Thus Chomsky is useful to citizens by providing them with the raw material to develop their own ideas in a way that the purveyors of ready-made but flimsily supported ideas are not. full: http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/critiquing-a-critique-of-lenin/ ________________________________________________ Send list submissions to: [email protected] Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
