======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


>> This borders on religion, and in the case of those leftists, and  
homosexuals, who opposed the crimes of the Cuban regime against same-sex love,  
instead of criticizing the lack of humanity, and even the bigotry, of the  
official policy of harassment, persecution, and discriminination against  
homosexuals, it supported the official barbarism. << 
 
Comment 
 
Official barbarism. 
 
Cuban policy towards homosexuals is classified as barbarism. Is this not  
"over the top?" 
 
The root historical problems of the national revolutionary movement of the  
past eras reside exclusively with the proletariat in the imperial center. 
Note  the word "root." Mistakes - real or perceived, in the former colonial 
theater  are secondary to this "root" problem, which was the inability of the 
proletariat  in the imperial center to emancipate itself much less the 
colonials. Actually, a  decisive section of the proletariat in the imperial 
centers - not just  "leaders," supported colonial oppression and exploitation 
because the  proletariat sensed its material well being was bound up with 
colonialism and  real barbarism against the world's people. 
 
To the point:  A capitalist China is better than, more lofty and  desirable 
than a China ruled by the imperialist. Anyone that doubts this for a  
moment should consult the people of China, their government and state. A Cuba  
governed by Cubans, Argentina, Brazil, Vietnam - be it capitalist or 
socialist,  is better than, more lofty and desirable than one rule by American 
imperialists.  The same applies world wide in all instances of the former 
colonies. More  interesting is why it was not possible for the proletariat in 
any of 
the  historical imperial centers to overthrow the power of capital. Let me 
guess the  reason for this inability according to "Trotskyism" - the Stalin 
polarity. 
 
Here's the clincher. Demanding that revolutionaries in another theater do  
precisely what the guys in the imperial center cannot do is the logic of a  
hypocrite. The historic support by revolutionaries in the imperial centers 
of  the national revolutionary movements of the previous eras, flows from the 
common  sense understanding that no one wants to be oppressed by us. 
 
WL.
 
 

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to