====================================================================== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. ======================================================================
By the objective standards of the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid (1973), as well as the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (2002), Zionist policy towards the Palestinian populations IS apartheid, as the term is authoritatively defined. It is no different from the way a particular act either can be defined as manslaughter or murder under a given body of law, or cannot. (In criminal cases, of course, there are often shades of gray; this is much less the case when considering Zionism as a criminal system.) Zionists often refer to "the apartheid analogy," but this is transparent * hasbara* and abuse of the English language. Observations of the apartheid inherent in Zionism are accusations, not analogies. On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Ismail Lagardien <ilagard...@yahoo.com>wrote: by equating it with apartheid is wrong. apartheid was 'resolved' with > legislative changes (seriously, trust me, I was there as a journalist for > every > single step), the zionists will not stop until there is no single arab in > their > midst!!! > -- "Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre, mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen lytlað." ________________________________________________ Send list submissions to: Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
