======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


This sounds like a near unprecedented development in Latin America. I don't
know of any other country there where the traditional army has come under
the kind of popular pressure that would lead it to make such a declaration.
I am not sure that even the Venezuelan army has done so. Of course, in Cuba
and Nicaragua, the traditional armies were defeated and abolished and the
replacing armies did at points make such declarations.

 

(This did not happen during the regime of Gen. Torres in Bolivia in 1971,
though Torres himself signed socialist declarations. Of course, on this list
someone is bound to raise the example of Chiang Kai-shek signing up with the
Comintern in 1926, but he did not do so as head of the army but as head of
the Kuomintang, the traditional bourgeois-revolutionary party, and neither
the army, the party or Chiang were required to declare for socialism to do
so.)

 

The Morales regime has had conflicts with sections of the army, which
supported the separatist landlords and capitalist in the eastern part of the
country. And the Bolivian revolution is in part the product of a mass
uprising that defeated the military.

 

At the same time, I know that the MAS and the broader stratum of
pro-revolution activists in Bolivia have been pretty systematically
participating in and propagandizing the army from the bottom up for some
years now.

 

One tell-tale sign will be how the US government and military respond to
this development. At a certain point, for instance, the US government
clearly decided that the Venezuelan army was no longer viable for their
purposes (although I am sure they still do subversive work there as
elsewhere).

 

I very much doubt that we are at the end of the line as far as conflicts
between sections of the army command-officer caste and the revolution. And I
doubt that the Bolivian worker and peasant militias will be laying down
their arms.

 

But this is nonetheless a tribute -- regardless of any likely reluctance and
two-faced pledges by the high command, which I cannot definitively judge
from here -- the breadth and strength of the Bolivian process.

 

And it is an extremely flimsy basis for unbridled attacks on the current
leadership of the process in Bolivia.

Fred Feldman

 

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to