======================================================================
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
======================================================================


Counterpunch January 12, 2011
An Open Letter to the President
Why Won't Obama Meet With the Left?

By RALPH NADER

Dear President Obama:

The sentiments expressed in this letter may have more meaning more for
you now that the results of the mid-term elections are clear. You have
seen what can happen when a number of your supporters lose their
enthusiasm and stay home or do not actively participate as volunteers.

In your first two years, you have developed a wide asymmetry between
your association with Big Business executives and the leaders of
national civic and labor groups whose members are in the tens of
millions. You have met repeatedly at the White House and other locales
with corporate officials, spoken to their gatherings and even traveled
abroad with them to promote their exports.

Recently on your trip to India with a covey of business leaders, you
vigorously touted their products, some by brand name (Boeing and
Harley-Davidson's expensive motorcycles). Your traveling companions
could not have been more gratified as you legitimized their view that
WTO trade rules were a net plus for employment in the United States as
well as India. Imagine—the President as business agent.

Contrast this close relationship with profit-making firms, many
subsidized by the taxpayers in various ways, and probed for health,
safety or economic violations by regulatory agencies, with your
refusal to openly and regularly address the large non-profit civic
groups. Before your inauguration, I wrote requesting that you do what
Jimmy Carter did just after his election when he addressed and
interacted with nearly one thousand civic leaders at a Washington
hotel. They addressed a broad array of issues: environment, food,
labor, energy, consumer, equality for women, civil rights-civil
liberties and other endeavors for a better society. It was a grand and
productive occasion.

You know that the civic groups—often called the Independent
Sector—employ many thousands of people around the country often on
shoestring budgets with no profits in mind. They work for health,
safety, economic and environmental well being, for living wages and
access to justice, for peace and the rule of law in domestic and
foreign policy. Yet you as President do not adequately attach your
cachet in their favor and give them the visibility that you give
commercial businesses. Strange! For profits and jobs, yes I'm coming
says the President. For justice and jobs, no I'm not coming says the
President.

It is time to associate yourself with civil society, name some with
approbation as you have done with companies, express your support for
the expansion of their budgets and activities, in short, identify with
them.

Please note that when you invite the CEOs of Aetna and Pfizer numerous
times to the White House and cut deals not exactly in the patients'
best interest, while you decline to invite old friends and mentors on
these health insurance and health care subjects like Dr. Quentin Young
in Chicago, people are perplexed and communicate their displeasure via
their networks.

Last Friday, the Wall Street Journal reported that on February 7, you
"will cross Lafayette Park from the White House to the headquarters of
the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, his longtime political nemesis…" What
about walking next door and visiting your political friends at the
headquarters of the AFL-CIO whose member unions represent millions of
working Americans?

You can discuss with Richard Trumka, a former coal miner and the new
president of the AFL-CIO, your campaign promises in 2008. Repeatedly
you said to the American people that you supported the "card check"
and a "federal minimum wage of $9.50 in 2011." The 1968 minimum wage,
adjusted for inflation would be about $10 today. (The federal minimum
wage is now $7.25)

Moving up the minimum wage to nearly what it was back in 1968, in
purchasing power, would increase consumer demand by over $200 billion
a year. Isn't that what this economy needs right now, not to mention
the boon it would be to long deprived, underpaid workers and their
families? After all, businesses of all sizes have received a variety
of substantial tax breaks during this windfall period of a stagnant
federal minimum wage. Isn't it time for some equity for the people?

On a related note, over a year ago, Mr. Mike Kelleher, the man in
charge of letters written to you, said he would get back to me about
your policy on replying to letters that deal with substantive matters,
whether under your signature or the signature of your assistants and
department heads. I have not heard from Mr. Kelleher.

Let me give you an example. Months ago I wrote to inform you that
several prominent environmental and energy groups, such as Friends of
the Earth, Greenpeace, and the Union of Concerned Scientists, were at
their wit's end trying to arrange a joint meeting with Secretary
Steven Chu. He repeatedly declined to meet, though he has often met
with nuclear energy business executives and has gone so far as to tout
nuclear energy's desirability in an op-ed. The environmental groups
wanted a serious exchange with him on your Administration's energy
policies, including your request to Congress for very large loan
guarantees by taxpayers for utilities that want to build more nuclear
plants.

My letter asked you to intercede and urge Secretary Chu that it is
only fair and constructive to hear what these groups have to say.
There never was an answer from the White House or the Department of
Energy. You know that for years many citizen advocates have worked
hard to improve the federal government and they have rarely
experienced such discourtesies of no replies.

Perhaps you do not care. But you should know that there are people who
do. What is your response?

Sincerely,

Ralph Nader

________________________________________________
Send list submissions to: [email protected]
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to