----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 4:02 PM
Subject: RE: [MLL] The Historical
Significance of the Two-stage Revolution
Comrade Javad,
you
have thoroughly exposed your own idealism in refuting the historical
significance of the two-stage revolution as a mechanical materialist concept
that, although it contradicts the concepts of the proletariat concerning the
the dialectical process of change in society. It does eliminate the need
for the proletariat in the developing countries to suffer
the historical evolution of the capitalist forces of production under the
bourgeois dictatorship during the mechanisation, or industrialisation stage of
development of the developing nation.
Thus the
two-stage revolution is tactic of scientific-socialism introduced by
Marx and Engels in the interest of the proletariat in the advance to
socialism, further developed and successfully put into practice by Lenin and
Stalin, it is now an accepted
process being implimented in the
developing countries and
therefore should be fully understood as such and studied to
perfect it in the interest of the proletariat as a whole. It was a process specifically introduced to serve
the proletariat of the developing
countries.
Thus, the historical significance of the two-stage
proletarian revolution is, its capability to provide the proletariat of the
developing nations with a path to socialism without suffering the oppression
of the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie.
The conclusion to be drawn from our debate is
that you deny the two-stage revolution just
as Klo did, who went further to deny even that the October
revolution was a proletarian revolution, a point that you rightly contradicted
with him. However, you both denied that the October revolution was a two-stage
revolution much less recognising the historical significance of it.
I agree with you that
other comrades make their comments since it
needs to be considered why
you like Klo so desperately try to gloss over the true significance
of the October two-stage proletarian revolution and to carefully consider, who
does it serve to conceal the historical truth concerning the October two-stage
revolution?
fFaternally
Alan.
Comrades,
I have made my points regarding Alan's primitive
eclectic idealism, but Alan still thinks that I distort his
"dialectical" views. So, I hope that other comrades make their comments on
Alan's views. I have nothing further to say regarding Alan's idealism
because I have made many remarks previously and recently.
Javad
