In a message dated 7/24/2004 12:50:39 PM Central  Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 

>I think your last reply to  donoloc was the clearest expression yet of your 
formulation of the problem of  the transition to socialism and its limits in 
the industrial system, including  the sources of counter-revolutionary 
restoration. Howeevr, there needs to be  some debate and development of a response to 
the implication that socialism is  doomed and communism impossible -- until 
when? how? Are we condemned to die  fighting for a noble but lost cause?<

Reply 

Part of the  politics of engagement with our class enemy on a hostile 
economic terrain  reminds me of the glory of John Brown and Harpers Ferry. 
Abolitionists  propaganda and the antislavery cause was fought out for more than half 
a 
century  before the Civil War. 

We have engaged the class enemy in distant corners  of the world and on the 
most difficult terrain right here in the good ole US of  A. Ideological 
firmness and individual political will to resist and fight is  very important. 

We are abolitionists on the side of the  proletariat.  It has been 
traditional to date the antislavery abolitionists  movement from William Lloyd 
Garrison 
began publication of The Liberator, the  great abolitionist newspaper in 
Boston at 1831.  http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part4/4i2982.html 

My personal view of the  social process dates the leap . . . or transition 
that would become the rise of  the abolitionists movement . . . at 1790 when 
more than 30,000 slaves were freed  in the North when the market collapsed and 
slavery simply was uneconomical. In  the literary sense "Walkers Appeal" - 1829 
represents the polarization of the  abolitionists movement with Walker on the 
extreme "left" or calling for the  immediate abolition of slavery. David T. 
Walker was part of the free community  of blacks in Boston . . . home and birth 
place of The Liberator. 

The  abolition of slavery was historically inevitable as a consequence of the 
growth  of productive forces and the internal boundary and limits of slave 
(manual)  labor and became a political antagonism with industrial relations in 
the North.  The political antagonism was 300,000 slaveholders calling the 
economic and  political shots for the entire country which had different economic 
and social  needs. 

The overthrow of slavery had to be fought for. It was not a lost  cause. Even 
after slavery was overthrown the conditions of the ex-slaves  remained the 
same or got worse with the defeat of Reconstruction and remained in  this state 
until the mechanization of agriculture provided Southern agriculture  with the 
economic legs to stand upon. 

The African American masses have  waged a determined and militant struggle 
against oppression and exploitation . .  . in unison with millions of whites . . 
. but we are still faced with the  objective logic of history.  Every social 
revolution must proceed from,  stand upon and develop from an economic 
revolution. It is not possible to truly  liberate slaves or proletarians without 
replacing them with more efficient  energy. At the time of Emancipation, there was 
no such economic revolution in  the means of production connected to Southern 
agriculture. 

Here we face  the materiality of the dialectic of transition in the flesh. 
The only way to  truly free the proletariat as a class is by breaking its 
connection in  production and this cannot be done until more efficient forms of 
energy - an  advance technological regime emerges, that renders huge sector of 
labor  superfluous to the production process or the production of commodities.  

Such a moment in history has finally appeared. In this sense one can  speak 
of the destruction of value and the unraveling of the commodity form. To  
destroy value requires social revolution on the basis of the new technological  
regime that cannot gain supremacy because of the bourgeois property relations.  

The bourgeoisie is hitting the historical wall. 

Melvin P.  


If We Must Die 

If we must dieâlet it not be like hogs Hunted  and penned in an inglorious 
spot, 
While round us bark the mad and hungry  dogs, 
Making their mock at our accursed lot. 
If we must dieâoh, let us  nobly die, 
So that our precious blood may not be shed In vain; 
then even  the monsters we defy Shall be constrained to honor us though dead! 

Oh,  Kinsmen! We must meet the common foe; 
Though far outnumbered, let us show us  brave, 
And for their thousand blows deal one death blow! 
What though  before us lies the open grave?
Like men weâll face the murderous, cowardly  pack, 
Pressed to the wall, dying, 
but fighting back. 

--Claude  McKay, 1922

This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free  from 
http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm  


_______________________________________________
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list

Reply via email to