"Globalresearch.ca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:      Risky Geopolitical Game:  
Washington Plays ‘Tibet Roulette’ with China       
      function resizeImages()  {   var i = 0;      for(i=0; i  400)    {     
var ratio = 0;     var newH = 0;     ratio = 400 / document.images[i].width;    
 newH = document.images[i].height * ratio;     document.images[i].width = 400;  
   document.images[i].height = newH;    }   }     return true;  }               
 
        Risky Geopolitical Game:  Washington Plays ‘Tibet Roulette’ with China 
  

  By  F. William Engdahl  

       URL of this article: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8625

         Global Research, April 10, 2008
       
 Washington  has obviously decided on an ultra-high risk geopolitical game with 
 Beijing’s by fanning the flames of violence in Tibet just at this  sensitive 
time in their relations and on the run-up to the Beijing  Olympics. It’s part 
of an escalating strategy of destabilization of  China which has been initiated 
by the Bush Administration over the past  months. It also includes the attempt 
to ignite an anti-China Saffron  Revolution in the neighboring Myanmar region, 
bringing US-led NATO  troops into Darfur where China’s oil companies are 
developing  potentially huge oil reserves. It includes counter moves across  
mineral-rich Africa. And it includes strenuous efforts to turn India  into a 
major new US forward base on the Asian sub-continent to be  deployed against 
China, though evidence to date suggests the Indian  government is being very 
cautious not to upset Chinese relations. 
  The  current Tibet operation apparently got the green light in October last  
year when George Bush agreed to meet the Dalai Lama for the first time  
publicly in Washington. The President of the United States is not  unaware of 
the high stakes of such an insult to Beijing. Bush deepened  the affront to 
America’s largest trading partner, China, by agreeing to  attend as the US 
Congress awarded the Dalai Lama the Congressional Gold  Medal. 
  The immediate expressions of  support for the crimson monks of Tibet from 
George Bush, Condi Rice,  France’s Nicolas Sarkozy and Germany’s Angela Merkel 
most recently took  on dimensions of the absurd. Ms Merkel announced she would 
boycott  attending the August Beijing Summer Olympics as her protest at the  
Beijing treatment of the Tibetan monks. What her press secretary  omitted is 
that she had not even planned to go in the first place. 
  She  was followed by an announcement that Poland’s Prime Minister, the  
pro-Washington Donald Tusk, would also stay away, along with pro-US  Czech 
President Vaclav Klaus. It is unclear whether they also hadn’t  planned to go 
in the first place but it made for dramatic press  headlines.
  The recent wave of violent  protests and documented attacks by Tibetan monks 
against Han Chinese  residents began on March 10 when several hundred monks 
marched on Lhasa  to demand release of other monks allegedly detained for 
celebrating the  award of the US Congress’ Gold Medal last October. The monks 
were  joined by other monks marching to protest Beijing rule on the 49th 
anniversary of the Tibetan uprising against Chinese rule. 
  The geopolitical game 
  As  the Chinese government itself was clear to point out, the sudden  
eruption of anti-Chinese violence in Tibet, a new phase in the movement  led by 
the exiled Dalai Lama, was suspiciously timed to try to put the  spotlight on 
Beijing’s human rights record on the eve of the coming  Olympics. The Beijing 
Olympics are an event seen in China as a major  acknowledgement of the arrival 
of a new prosperous China on the world  stage. 
  The background actors in the Tibet  “Crimson revolution” actions confirm that 
Washington has been working  overtime in recent months to prepare another of 
its infamous Color  Revolutions, these fanning public protests designed to 
inflict maximum  embarrassment on Beijing. The actors on the ground in and 
outside Tibet  are the usual suspects, tied to the US State Department, 
including the  National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the CIA’s Freedom House 
through  its chairman, Bette Bao Lord and her role in the International  
Committee for Tibet, as well as the Trace Foundation financed by the  wealth of 
George Soros through his daughter, Andrea Soros Colombel.
  Chinese  Prime Minister Wen Jiabao has accused the Dalai Lama of 
orchestrating  the latest unrest to sabotage the Olympic Games “in order to 
achieve  their unspeakable goal”, Tibetan independence. 
  Bush  telephoned his Chinese counterpart, President Hu Jintao, to pressure  
for talks between Beijing and the exiled Dalai Lama. The White House  said that 
Bush, “raised his concerns about the situation in Tibet and  encouraged the 
Chinese government to engage in substantive dialogue  with the Dalai Lama’s 
representatives and to allow access for  journalists and diplomats.” 
  President Hu  reportedly told Bush the Dalai Lama must “stop his sabotage” of 
the  Olympics before Beijing takes a decision on talks with the exiled  Tibetan 
spiritual leader, foreign ministry spokesman Qin Gang said.
  Dalai Lama’s odd friends 
  In  the West the image of the Dalai Lama has been so much promoted that in  
many circles he is deemed almost a God. While the spiritual life of the  Dalai 
Lama is not our focus, it is relevant to note briefly the circles  he has 
chosen to travel in most of his life.
  The  Dalai Lama travels in what can only be called rather conservative  
political circles. What is generally forgotten today is that during the  1930’s 
the Nazis including Gestapo chief Heinrich Himmler and other top  Nazi Party 
leaders regarded Tibet as the holy site of the survivors of  the lost Atlantis, 
and the origin of the “Nordic pure race.” 
  When  he was 11 and already designated Dalai Lama, he was befriended by  
Heinrich Harrer, a Nazi Party member and officer of Heinrich Himmler’s  feared 
SS. Far from the innocent image of him in the popular Hollywood  film with Brad 
Pitt, Harrer was an elite SS member at the time he met  the 11 year old Dalai 
Lama and became his tutor in “the world outside  Tibet.” While only the Dalai 
Lama knows the contents of Harrer’s  private lessons, the two remained friends 
until Harrer died a ripe 93  in 2006.1 
  That  sole friendship, of course, does not define a person’s character, but  
it is interesting in the context of later friends. In April 1999, along  with 
Margaret Thatcher, and former Beijing Ambassador, CIA Director and  President, 
George H.W. Bush, the Dalai Lama demanded the British  government release 
Augusto Pinochet, the former fascist dictator of  Chile and a longtime CIA 
client who was visiting England. The Dalai  Lama urged that Pinochet not be 
forced to go to Spain where he was  wanted to stand trial for crimes against 
humanity. The Dalai Lama had  close ties to Miguel Serrano2, head of Chile’s 
National Socialist Party, a   proponent of something called esoteric Hitlerism. 
3 
  Leaving  aside at this point the claim of the Dalai Lama to divinity, what is 
 indisputable is that he has been surrounded and financed in significant  part, 
since his flight into Indian exile in 1959, by various US and  Western 
intelligence services and their gaggle of NGOs. It is the  agenda of the 
Washington friends of the Dalai Lama that is relevant  here.
  The NED at work again... 
  As author Michael Parenti notes in his work, Friendly Feudalism: The Tibet 
Myth, “during  the 1950s and 60s, the CIA actively backed the Tibetan cause 
with arms,  military training, money, air support and all sorts of other help.” 
The  US-based American Society for a Free Asia, a CIA front, publicized the  
cause of Tibetan resistance, with the Dalai Lama’s eldest brother,  Thubtan 
Norbu, playing an active role in the group. The Dalai Lama’s  second-eldest 
brother, Gyalo Thondup, established an intelligence  operation with the CIA in 
1951. It was later upgraded into a  CIA-trained guerrilla unit whose recruits 
parachuted back into Tibet,  according to Parenti.4 
  According  to declassified US intelligence documents released in the late 
1990s,  “for much of the 1960s, the CIA provided the Tibetan exile movement  
with $1.7 million a year for operations against China, including an  annual 
subsidy of $180,000 for the Dalai Lama.” 5 
  With  help of the CIA, the Dalai Lama fled to Dharamsala, India where he  
lives to the present. He continues to receive millions of dollars in  backing 
today, not from the CIA but from a more innocuous-sounding CIA  front 
organization, funded by the US Congress, the National Endowment  for Democracy 
(NED). The NED has been instrumental in every US-backed  Color Revolution 
destabilization from Serbia to Georgia to Ukraine to  Myanmar. Its funds go to 
back opposition media and global public  relations campaigns to popularize 
their pet opposition candidates. 
  As  in the other recent Color Revolutions, the US Government is fanning the  
flames of destabilization against China by funding opposition protest  
organizations inside and outside Tibet through its arm, the National  Endowment 
for Democracy (NED). 
  The NED  was founded by the Reagan Administration in the early 1980’s, on the 
 recommendation of Bill Casey, Reagan’s Director of the Central  Intelligence 
Agency (CIA), following a series of high-publicity  exposures of CIA 
assassinations and destabilizations of unfriendly  regimes. The NED was 
designed to pose as an independent NGO, one step  removed from the CIA and 
Government agencies so as to be less  conspicuous, presumably. The first acting 
President of the NED, Allen  Weinstein, commented to the Washington Post that, 
“A lot of what we  [the NED] do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the 
CIA.” 6 
  American  intelligence historian, William Blum states, “The NED played an  
important role in the Iran-Contra affair of the 1980s, funding key  components 
of Oliver North's shadowy "Project Democracy." This network  privatized US 
foreign policy, waged war, ran arms and drugs, and  engaged in other equally 
charming activities. In 1987, a White House  spokesman stated that those at NED 
"run Project Democracy." 7 
  The  most prominent pro-Dalai Lama Tibet independence organization today is  
the International Campaign for Tibet, founded in Washington in 1988.  Since at 
least 1994 the ICT has been receiving funds from the NED. The  ICT awarded 
their annual Light of Truth award in 2005 to Carl Gershman,  founder of the 
NED. Other ICT award winners have included the German  Friedrich Naumann 
Foundation and Czech leader, Vaclav Havel. The ICT  Board of Directors is 
peopled with former US State Department officials  including Gare Smith and 
Julia Taft. 8 
  Another  especially active anti-Beijing organization is the US-based Students 
 for a Free Tibet, founded in 1994 in New York City as a project of US  Tibet 
Committee and the NED-financed International Campaign for Tibet  (ICT). The SFT 
is most known for unfurling a 450 foot banner atop the  Great Wall in China; 
calling for a free Tibet, and accusing Beijing of  wholly unsubstantiated 
claims of genocide against Tibet. Apparently it  makes good drama to rally 
naïve students. 
  The  SFT was among five organizations which this past January that  
proclaimed start of a "Tibetan people's uprising" on Jan 4 this year  and 
co-founded a temporary office in charge of coordination and  financing.
  Harry Wu is another prominent  Dalai Lama supporter against Beijing. He 
became notorious for claiming  falsely in a 1996 Playboy interview that he had 
“videotaped a prisoner  whose kidneys were surgically removed while he was 
alive, and then the  prisoner was taken out and shot. The tape was broadcast by 
BBC." The  BBC film showed nothing of the sort, but the damage was done. How 
many  people check old BBC archives? Wu, a retired Berkeley professor who  left 
China after imprisonment as a dissident, is head of the Laogai  Research 
Foundation, a tax-exempt organization whose main funding is  from the NED.9 
  Among  related projects, the US Government-financed NED also supports the  
Tibet Times newspaper, run out of the Dalai Lama’s exile base at  Dharamsala, 
India. The NED also funds the Tibet Multimedia Center for  “information 
dissemination that addresses the struggle for human rights  and democracy in 
Tibet,” also based in Dharamsala. And NED finances the  Tibetan Center for 
Human Rights and Democracy. 
  In  short, US State Department and US intelligence community finger prints  
are all over the upsurge around the Free Tibet movement and the  anti-Han 
Chinese attacks of March. The question to be asked is why, and  especially why 
now?
  Tibet’s raw minerals treasure 
  Tibet  is of strategic import to China not only for its geographical location 
 astride the border with India, Washington’s newest anti-China ally in  Asia. 
Tibet is also a treasure of minerals and also oil. Tibet contains  some of the 
world's largest uranium and borax deposits, one half of the  world's lithium, 
the largest copper deposits in Asia, enormous iron  deposits, and over 80,000 
gold mines. Tibet's forests are the largest  timber reserve at China's 
disposal; as of 1980, an estimated $54  billion worth of trees had been felled 
and taken by China. Tibet also  contains some of the largest oil reserves in 
the region.10 
  On  the Tibet Autonomous Region’s border along the Xinjiang Uygur  Autonomous 
Region is also a vast oil and mineral region in the Qaidam  Basin, known as a 
"treasure basin." The Basin has 57 different types of  mineral resources with 
proven reserves including petroleum, natural  gas, coal, crude salt, potassium, 
magnesium, lead, zinc and gold. These  mineral resources have a potential 
economic value of 15 trillion yuan  or US$1.8 trillion. Proven reserves of 
potassium, lithium and crude  salt in the basin are the biggest in China.
  And  situated as it is, on the “roof of the world,” Tibet is perhaps the  
world’s most valuable water source. Tibet is the source of seven of  Asia's 
greatest rivers which provide water for 2 billion people.” He  who controls 
Tibet’s water has a mighty powerful geopolitical lever  over all Asia. 
  But the prime interest of  Tibet for Washington today is its potential to act 
as a lever to  destabilize and blackmail the Beijing Government. 
  Washington’s ‘nonviolence as a form of warfare’ 
    The  events in Tibet since March 10 have been played in Western media with  
little regard to accuracy or independent cross-checking. Most of the  pictures 
blown up in European and US newspapers and TV have not even  been of Chinese 
military oppression of Tibetan lamas or monks. They  have been shown to be in 
most cases either Reuters or AFP pictures of  Han Chinese being beaten by 
Tibetan monks in paramilitary  organizations. In some instances German TV 
stations ran video pictures  of beatings that were not even from Tibet but 
rather by Nepalese police  in Kathmandu. 11 
  The  western media complicity simply further underlies that the actions  
around Tibet are part of a well-orchestrated destabilization effort on  the 
part of Washington. What few people realize is that the National  Endowment for 
Democracy (NED) was also instrumental, along with Gene  Sharp’s misnamed Albert 
Einstein Institution through Colonel Robert  Helvey, in encouraging the student 
protests at Tiananmen Square in June  1989. The Albert Einstein Institution, as 
it describes itself,  specializes in "nonviolence as a form of warfare." 12 
  Colonel  Helvey was formerly with the Defense Intelligence Agency stationed 
in  Myanmar. Helvey trained in Hong Kong the student leaders from Beijing  in 
mass demonstration techniques which they were to use in the  Tiananmen Square 
incident of June 1989. He is now believed acting as an  adviser to the Falun 
Gong in similar civil disobedience techniques.  Helvey nominally retired from 
the army in 1991, but had been working  with the Albert Einstein Institution 
and George Soros’ Open Society  Foundation long before then. In its annual 
report for 2004 Helvey’s  Albert Einstein Institution admitted to advising 
people in Tibet. 13 
  With  the emergence of the Internet and mobile telephone use, the US Pentagon 
 has refined an entirely new form of regime change and political  
destabilization. As one researcher of the phenomenon behind the wave of  color 
revolutions, Jonathan Mowat, describes it, 
  “...What  we are seeing is civilian application of Secretary Donald 
Rumsfeld's  "Revolution in Military Affairs" doctrine, which depends on highly  
mobile small group deployments "enabled" by "real time" intelligence  and 
communications. Squads of soldiers taking over city blocks with the  aid of 
"intelligence helmet" video screens that give them an  instantaneous overview 
of their environment, constitute the military  side. Bands of youth converging 
on targeted intersections in constant  dialogue on cell phones constitute the 
doctrine's civilian application.  
  “This  parallel should not be surprising since the US military and National  
Security Agency subsidized the development of the Internet, cellular  phones, 
and software platforms. From their inception, these  technologies were studied 
and experimented with in order to find the  optimal use in a new kind of 
warfare. The "revolution" in warfare that  such new instruments permit has been 
pushed to the extreme by several  specialists in psychological warfare. 
Although these military utopians  have been working in high places, (for 
example the RAND Corporation),  for a very long time, to a large extent they 
only took over some of the  most important command structures of the US 
military apparatus with the  victory of the neoconservatives in the Pentagon of 
Donald Rumsfeld.14 
  Goal to control China 
  Washington  policy has used and refined these techniques of “revolutionary  
nonviolence,” and NED operations embodied a series of ‘democratic’ or  soft 
coup projects as part of a larger strategy which would seek to cut  China off 
from access to its vital external oil and gas reserves. 
  The  1970’s quote attributed to then-Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, a  
proponent of British geopolitics in an American context comes to mind:  “If you 
control the oil you control entire nations...” 
  The  destabilization attempt by Washington using Tibet, no doubt with quiet  
“help” from its friends in British and other US-friendly intelligence  
services, is part of a clear pattern. 
  It  includes Washington’s “Saffron revolution” attempts to destabilize  
Myanmar. It includes the ongoing effort to get NATO troops into Darfur  to 
block China’s access to strategically vital oil resources there and  elsewhere 
in Africa. It includes attempts to foment problems in  Uzbekistan, Kyrgystan 
and to disrupt China’s vital new energy pipeline  projects to Kazakhstan. The 
earlier Asian Great Silk Road trade routes  went through Tashkent in Uzbekistan 
and Almaty in Kazakhstan for  geographically obvious reasons, in a region 
surrounded by major  mountain ranges. Geopolitical control of Uzbekistan, 
Kyrgystan,  Kazakhstan would enable control of any potential pipeline routes  
between China and Central Asia just as the encirclement of Russia  controls 
pipeline and other ties between it and western Europe, China,  India and the 
Middle East, where China depends on uninterrupted oil  flows from Iran, Saudi 
Arabia and other OPEC countries.
  Behind the strategy to encircle China 
  In  this context, a revealing New York Council on Foreign Relations  analysis 
in their Foreign Affairs magazine from Zbigniew Brzezinski  from 
September/October 1997 is worth quoting. Brzezinski, a protégé of  David 
Rockefeller and a follower of the founder of British geopolitics,  Sir Halford 
Mackinder, is today the foreign policy adviser to  Presidential candidate, 
Barack Obama. In 1997 he revealingly wrote:
  
  ‘Eurasia  is home to most of the world's politically assertive and dynamic  
states. All the historical pretenders to global power originated in  Eurasia. 
The world's most populous aspirants to regional hegemony,  China and India, are 
in Eurasia, as are all the potential political or  economic challengers to 
American primacy. After the United States, the  next six largest economies and 
military spenders are there, as are all  but one of the world's overt nuclear 
powers, and all but one of the  covert ones. Eurasia accounts for 75 percent of 
the world's population;  60 percent of its GNP, and 75 percent of its energy 
resources. Collectively, Eurasia's potential power overshadows even America's. 
  ‘Eurasia  is the world's axial super-continent. A power that dominated 
Eurasia  would exercise decisive influence over two of the world's three most  
economically productive regions, Western Europe and East Asia. A glance  at the 
map also suggests that a country dominant in Eurasia would  almost 
automatically control the Middle East and Africa. With Eurasia  now serving as 
the decisive geopolitical chessboard, it no longer  suffices to fashion one 
policy for Europe and another for Asia. What  happens with the distribution of 
power on the Eurasian landmass will be  of decisive importance to America's 
global primacy....’15 (emphasis mine-w.e.).
  This  statement, written well before the US-led bombing of former Yugoslavia  
and the US military occupations in Afghanistan and Iraq, or its support  of the 
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline, puts Washington pronouncements  about ‘ridding 
the world of tyranny’ and about spreading democracy,  into a somewhat different 
context from the one usually mentioned by  George W. Bush of others. 
  It’s  about global hegemony, not democracy. It should be no surprise when  
powers such as China are not convinced that giving Washington such  
overwhelming power is in China’s national interest, any more than  Russia 
thinks that it would be a step towards peace to let NATO gobble  up Ukraine and 
Georgia and put US missiles on Russia’s doorstep “to  defend against threat of 
Iranian nuclear attack on the United States.” 
  The  US-led destabilization in Tibet is part of a strategic shift of great  
significance. It comes at a time when the US economy and the US dollar,  still 
the world’s reserve currency, are in the worst crisis since the  1930’s. It is 
significant that the US Administration sends Wall Street  banker, former 
Goldman Sachs chairman, Henry Paulson to Beijing in the  midst of its efforts 
to embarrass Beijing in Tibet. Washington is  literally playing with fire. 
China long ago surpassed Japan as the  world’s largest holder of foreign 
currency reserves, now in the range  of $1.5 trillions, most of which are 
invested in US Treasury debt  instruments. Paulson knows well that were Beijing 
to decide it could  bring the dollar to its knees by selling only a small 
portion of its US  debt on the market. 
  Endnotes:

  1 Ex-Nazi, Dalai's tutor Harrer dies at 93, The Times of India, 9 Jan 2006, 
in 
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-1363946,prtpage-1.cms.
  2  Goodrick-Clarke, Nicholas, Black Sun: Aryan Cults, Esoteric Nazism and  
the Politics of Identity, New York University Press, 2001, p. 177.
  3  Goldner, Colin, Mönchischer Terror auf dem Dach der Welt Teil 1: Die  
Begeisterung für den Dalai Lama und den tibetischen Buddhismus, March  26, 
2008, excerpted from the book Dalai Lama: Fall eines Gottkönigs,  Alibri 
Verlag,, new edition to appear April 2008, reproduced in 
http://www.jungewelt.de/2008/03-27/006.php.
  4 Parenti, Michael, Friendly   Feudalism: The Tibet Myth, June 2007, in 
www.michaelparenti.org/Tibet.html. 
  5 Mann, Jim, CIA funded covert Tibet exile campaign in 1960s, The Age 
(Australia), Sept. 16, 1998.
  6 Ignatius, D., Innocence Abroad: The New World of Spyless Coups, The 
Washington Post, 22 September 1991.
  7 Blum, William, The NED and ‘Project Democracy,’ January 2000, in 
www.friendsoftibet.org/databank/usdefence/usd5.html
  8  Barker, Michael, ’Democratic Imperialism’: Tibet, China and the  National 
Endowment for Democracy, Global Research, August 13, 2007, 
www.globalresearch.ca. 
  9 McGehee, Ralph, Ralph McGehee’ s Archive on JFK Place, CIA Operations in 
China Part III, May   2, 1996, in www.acorn.net/jfkplace/03/RM/RM.china-for.
  10 US Tibet Committee, Fifteen things you should know about Tibet and China, 
in 
http://ustibetcommittee.org/facts/facts.html.
  11 Goldner, Colin, Mönchischer Terror auf dem Dach der Welt Teil 2: Krawalle 
im Vorfeld der   Olympischen Spiele, op cit. 
  12 Mowat, Jonathan, The new Gladio in action?, Online Journal, Mar 19, 2005, 
in 
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/printer_308.shtml.
  13 Ibid.
  14 Ibid.
  15 Brzezinski, Zbigniew, A Geostrategy for Eurasia, Foreign Affairs, 76:5, 
September/October 1997.

      

 Please support Global Research 
Global Research relies on the financial support of its readers.   [input]  
[input]  [input]  [input]  [input]  [input]  [input]  [input]   
  Your endorsement is greatly appreciated       
---------------------------------
         Disclaimer:  The views expressed in this article are the sole 
responsibility of the  author and do not necessarily reflect those of the 
Centre for Research  on Globalization.

  To become a Member of Global Research

  The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research  articles on 
community internet sites as long as the text & title  are not modified. The 
source and the author's copyright must be  displayed. For publication of Global 
Research articles in print or  other forms including commercial internet sites, 
contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  www.globalresearch.ca  contains copyrighted material the use of which has not 
always been  specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such 
 material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in  an 
effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and  social 
issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit  to those who 
have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for  research and educational 
purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted  material for purposes other than 
"fair use" you must request permission  from the copyright owner.

  For media inquiries: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  © Copyright F. William Engdahl , Global Research, 2008 

  The url address of this article is: 
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8625  
      
---------------------------------

© Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca
Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia © Copyright 2005-2007



        
  Forward email
  
      This email was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Update Profile/Email Address | Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe™ | 
Privacy Policy.
    Email Marketing by
      
GlobalResearch.ca | v | montreal | Canada              
  
 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



Lal Salam (Red Salute)

P (India)


www.geocities.com/marxistfront
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"When I gave food to the poor, they called me a saint. When I
    asked why the poor were hungry, they called me a communist."
                        --Dom Helder Camara

                               *****
       
---------------------------------
 Meet people who discuss and share your passions.  Join them now.
_______________________________________________
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
Marxist-Leninist-List@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list

Reply via email to