Michael hudson: I was referring to debt deflation. As the debt overhead  
grows exponentially, it siphons off more and more money from being spent on  
production and consumption. For the financial sector, this is applauded as 
being  
the miracle of compound interest. The volume of loans keeps on growing by 
purely  mathematical principles, without much regard for the economy's ability 
(or  
inability) to generate a large enough surplus to pay. More and more wages,  
corporate profits and tax revenues have to be earmarked to pay creditors. These 
 creditors then turn around and lend out their flow of debt service to yet 
new  borrowers. This involves finding more and more risky markets, while the 
debt  becomes heavier and heavier.
 
To pay the carrying charges on these debts, wage earners cut back  
consumption while debt-wracked companies cut back on new capital investment,  
research 
and development. State, local and federal governments also pay interest  on 
their deficits by cutting back on spending to maintain infrastructure or  
improve 
services. These cutbacks shrink the domestic market, leading to lower  
investment and hiring. All this is applauded as the magic of the marketplace in 
 
allocating resources. But it's the financial sector that is doing the  
applauding, not industry.
 
MW: Does that mean that there will be sudden jolts to the system like a  
major bank--perhaps Citigroup or Merrill---keeling over and sending the stock  
market crashing?
 
Michael Hudson: The economy reaches a Ponzi stage where banks lend their  
customers the interest to keep payments current. More and more mortgage loans  
have been structured this way in recent years. When creditors stop making these 
 
loans, there's a break in the chain of payments and defaults spread, crashing 
 markets.
 
MW: Is the dollar doomed, or can the US lower its dual-deficits (fiscal and  
trade deficits) and continue to attract foreign capital in the future? And if  
the recession takes hold, business slows and unemployment rises, would that  
strengthen the dollar?
 
Michael Hudson: I assume that by doom you mean that the dollar will  continue 
to sink against foreign currencies, while price inflation eats away at  what 
wages will buy. The idea that a worse economy will be self-curing is IMF  
anti-labor ideology and Chicago School propaganda. This is indeed what Nobel  
Economic Prizes are given for, I grant you. But it's Junk Economics. A falling  
dollar threatens to become self-reinforcing. For starters, dollar-denominated  
stocks, bonds and real estate are worth less and less in terms of euros,  
sterling or other harder and foreign currencies. This doesn't provide much  
incentive for foreigners to invest here. And if we go into a recession (not to  
speak 
of depression), there will be even fewer profitable opportunities to  invest.
 
Meanwhile, U.S. import dependency will continue to rise as the economy  
de-industrializes ­ that is, as it is further financialized. U.S. overseas  
military spending will throw yet more dollars onto the world's foreign exchange 
 
markets. So a weak economy here does NOT mean that the dollar will strengthen; 
 it means we have a bad investment climate! Austerity will make us more 
dependent  on foreign countries. For a foretaste, just look at what has 
happened 
when the  IMF has imposed austerity plans on Third World debtors. And remember, 
last time  when Robert Rubin was given a free hand, in reforming Russia under 
Clinton, the  result was industrial collapse and bankruptcy.
 
full _http://www.counterpunch.org/whitney07012008.html_ 
(http://www.counterpunch.org/whitney07012008.html) 
 
 



**************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for 
fuel-efficient used cars.      
(http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)

_______________________________________________
Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
Marxist-Leninist-List@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxist-leninist-list

Reply via email to