Lenin anniversary marked with renewed calls to empty his mausoleum
by Andy Potts at 21/01/2011 14:15


To mark the anniversary of his death, plans are once again afoot to move Lenin 
out of his Red Square mausoleum.

The latest proposal comes from the ruling United Russia party’s Vladimir Medin, 
though party leaders have distanced themselves from any official standpoint.

Medin argues that it is “blasphemous and satanic” to keep Lenin in his city 
centre resting place, and also has designs on shifting the funereal alley of 
Soviet heroes from their spots under the Kremlin walls.

He said that venerating a figure as controversial as Lenin in this way was “an 
extreme absurdity”, adding that it is wrong to have a cemetery which doubles as 
a venue for rock concerts and similar events.


Distant prospect

It’s a familiar story, and the battle lines have been drawn up in predictable 
fashion. In the red corner, Communist leader Gennady Zyuganov dismissed the 
idea as “political provocation”.

And left-wing splinter group, the Communist Party of Leningrad Region (KPLO), 
was even more outspoken.

It’s ideologue, Sergei Ovanisyan, railed against the “tribal homegrown 
pygmies”, incapable of comprehending Lenin’s greatness, who demanded his 
eviction from the mausoleum.

But a Kremlin official told Vedomosti that there may be a gradual move towards 
reinterring Soviet heroes away from Red Square.

The establishment of a military memorial cemetery near the Moscow Region town 
of Mytishchi could, in due course, provide a permanent resting place for at 
least some of those under Kremlin wall.

And that would please Medin’s allies, such as Alexei Chesnakov, who described 
Lenin’s tomb as an “insulting and unacceptable pagan cult”.


No demolition

Even if Vladimir Ilyich is eventually rehoused – an outcome which would also 
reflect his own reported wishes as relayed by his widow Nadezhda Krupskaya – 
the little red pyramid is set to remain.

Mikhail Fedotov, chairman of the presidential council for Human Rights, said 
that the building is a valuable work of 20th –centry architecture and should be 
preserved as a museum.

And even that prospect seems remote, according to Viktor Khrekov of the 
presidential property administration.

He told Interfax that there have been no decisions and no discussion is planned 
at the moment.

Marxist-Leninist-List mailing list
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:

Reply via email to