>From Klo


    **********************************************
    **      THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY      **
    **  YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE  **
    **********************************************

The original message was received at Thu, 1 Feb 2001 22:03:46 -0500 (EST)
from d282.as1.clmb.oh.voyager.net [216.28.53.26]

   ----- The following addresses had transient non-fatal errors -----
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
451 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... reply: read error from 
lists.wwpublish.com.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Deferred: Connection reset by 
lists.wwpublish.com.
Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours
Will keep trying until message is 5 days old
Reporting-MTA: dns; mailcore4.oh.voyager.net
Arrival-Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 22:03:46 -0500 (EST)

Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: delayed
Status: 4.4.2
Remote-MTA: DNS; lists.wwpublish.com
Last-Attempt-Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 02:20:29 -0500 (EST)
Will-Retry-Until: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 22:03:46 -0500 (EST)


(snip)

=== message truncated ===

    Klo, why do you have to engage in pointless arguments
    about what my web name is. What does it really matter.
    Can't you find a better argument to criticise me on?


My reply,
This has always been a side issue with me and you know it, so don�t try
to paint it as something it isn�t in order to put me on the defensive.
You conveniently ignore the fact that I even included it as part of a
P.S.



 I don't know how you got the impression that I called
    myself Comandante Che in this NG. Could someone tell
    me or Klo when I have ever called myself Comandante
    Che in this NG?? As far as I know you called me
    Comandante Che when you visited my site. I thought we
    agreed to drop this topic, but it seems you are a bit
    reluctant.


My reply,
The only names I have seen in your messages in regard to you personally
are Commandante Che and Joseph Stalin, neither of which you are.  Now
why don�t you tell me your real name or make up a pseudonym and use it,
so we can more on to more substantive issues.


And no, I don't disagree with Rafael on
    when socialism beggun in Russia. He says it was
    established as a system after Stalin, after the
    collectivisation and industralisation. This is exactly
    what Stalin (no, I don't mean me. I think you are
    smarter not to confuse the two, and certainly claiming
    that you can't doesn't help your image) said.

My reply,
Why don�t you and Rafael do a better job of identifying who is saying
what on your messages.  Earlier I attributed to him comments that were
being made by you because of nebulosity.  As far as this particular
point is concerned, it is the only significant one I have found in which
my view seems to differ from Stalin�s.  Not long ago I was reading
Chuev�s interview of Molotov and noticed the latter seemed to have the
same problem with Stalin�s formulation and agreed with me.
 If socialism was established in the Soviet Union �after Stalin� or near
the end of his leadership, then what kind of system did they have
previously.

For the cause,

Klo

PS.  Most important:  I am still waiting for replies to all those
political questions I posed which you have studiously avoided
answering.  Do you want me to repeat them for the umpteenth time?  This
is the kind of response I received repeatedly on the Trot NG and is a
major reason I left their benightedness.  They were quick to attack Soso
but evaded offering alternatives or answering queries.  Simply stated,
the would tell you what they were against but not what they were for.
 Tomorrow I will try to reply to the post from Charles which is more
thoughtful.






Reply via email to