https://multiracialunity.org/2020/06/29/book-review-white-fragility-versus-anti-racist-agility/

Book Review: “White Fragility” versus Anti Racist Agility
[email protected] 29, 2020
By Karyn Pomerantz, June 29, 2020

“White Fragility” by Robin DiAngelo ranks as the number one best selling book 
on many publisher lists and has a months long waiting list at public libraries. 
 It clearly has an important message to garner such attention. What does this 
message mean for a multiracial fight against racism as we’ve witnessed in the 
protests around the world? What kinds of strategies does it encourage to 
overcome the racist nature of capitalism?

Dr. DiAngelo is a white woman educator who helps companies and organizations 
diversify their workforces and develop more harmony between workers of 
different “racial” and ethnic backgrounds. She creates and delivers an 
antiracist curriculum to the employees, mostly white, in order to expose white 
people’s racism and, as she states, to encourage them to recognize their 
privilege so they can stop oppressing black people. (The book focuses on black 
and white people). 

There is no way to live in this toxic society without learning the false, 
racist stereotypes pounded into us of black “criminals,” “illegal” Mexicans, 
“diseased” Asians, “redneck” whites, or “drunk” Native Americans. There is no 
reason workers need to be defensive when confronting racism as long as they 
struggle against it in their ideas and actions. Placing the ruling class as the 
inventor and beneficiary of racism by generating wealth and divisions can help 
alleviate the dysfunctional guilt and anger many white people display.

DiAngelo defines white fragility as the defensive and angry reactions white 
people exhibit when called out for racism. This racism can be interpersonal 
slights by white people, such as centering attention on oneself, dominating 
conversations, or making insensitive comments about the hair of a black woman. 

Racism also influences people’s ideas about society, such as the beliefs that 
affirmative action gives black and Latin people an advantage over whites in 
employment and education, that black men are dangerous, and that poverty, not 
discrimination, is the only problem.  There is no evidence for any of these 
beliefs.  In fact, white women benefited more from affirmative action programs 
than any other group (Crenshaw, 2006), and black families with higher incomes 
and education have higher rates of bad birth outcomes compared to white women 
with lower incomes and education (Novoa, 2018; California Newsreel, 2014). 

Strengths

DiAngelo correctly describes key tenets of US racism. She explains how the 
early colonizers developed “race” as a concept to justify inequality and bribed 
white indentured servants with higher wages, coercive policing positions on the 
plantations, and a higher status. She acknowledges how racism divided people 
and enabled the landowners to rule in relative peace except for slave 
rebellions and the occasional opposition from black, white, and Native American 
fighters. 

She and Ibram X. Kendi (Stamped from the Beginning and How to be an Antiracist) 
also agree that the practices of enslavement, Jim Crow codes, incarceration, 
and discrimination led to the construction of racist ideas disseminated widely 
by media depictions to protect the status quo whereas many race theorists 
believe bad attitudes cause bad policies. However, White Fragility only 
instructs readers to change attitudes rather than policies. 

She identifies the angry and defensive reactions white people (who volunteer 
for the sessions) have in her workshops when confronted by descriptions of 
their racist behaviors, reactions that will be familiar to many readers. They 
include white solidarity, sticking together as a “race;” rejecting the training 
because they are anti-racist, have read many books, or already know black 
people. She offers  strategies to de-escalate tense situations and to recognize 
one’s own racist behaviors.

Weaknesses

However, she does not advise her audience to take meaningful actions to change 
behaviors or engage in antiracist campaigns, let alone why white people would 
need to do so. (Keep in mind that in this diversity-industrial complex, 
companies pay for these workshops and would not support them if they taught 
employees how to demand unions, higher wages, and other costly benefits). 

One wonders how much her presentation generates the anger she attributes to 
white fragility. As one Amazon reviewer wrote:

“I find it amusing that at no point does the author consider the following 
possibility- that ‘white people’ do not react negatively to conversations about 
race per se, but that it is simply the way SHE has such conversations that 
upsets people. Since almost all the ‘evidence’ base for this book is entirely 
from the author’s own experience…..the clear conclusion is that she just pisses 
people off when she gives her seminars. Should she be surprised that when you 
tell people that somehow they are not individuals and are a monolith driven by 
forces that they do not understand….but magically she DOES understand….that 
they will be pissed off?” (International Reviews). 

Aside from the contentious nature of the workshops, she makes the same mistakes 
other acclaimed “unpacking racism” educators make and that many activists 
embrace. She lumps all white people into one monolithic block without any 
acknowledgement of class or even different viewpoints “This book is  
unapologetically rooted in identity politics.” She holds all white people 
accountable for oppressing everyone else in order to maintain a higher social 
status (i.e. “privilege”). This was and is the exact intention of the past and 
present ruling classes: enslave all workers in different ways but give a bit 
more to the whites so they will align with the rich and not their brothers, 
sisters, and non-binary people who have the same needs. 

Contrast this with Kendi’s position that individuals of different “races” have 
different perspectives and class interests. White people who hold powerful 
positions in society use racism to generate profit by paying black and Latin 
workers less, cutting social services, and dividing workers so they don’t fight 
back. They underpay black, brown, and indigenous workers; track them into the 
worst (or no) jobs; deny them critical services like housing and food; and 
severely repress them with police violence, surveillance, and imprisonment. 
White privilege theories argue that white workers benefit from racism because 
they don’t experience the same levels of oppression. However, the vast majority 
of white workers at all income levels do not benefit from this. Many experience 
these same problems although at different levels of harm. Thirty million 
unemployed people have more in common with each other than white workers have 
with Jeff Bezos. Furthermore, workers throughout the world need to unite in 
order to fight for common needs.

As Metzl explains in Dying of Whiteness, some white workers he interviewed 
refused Medicaid benefits, viewing them as a hand out for black people, thereby 
increasing their own risks of dying. For decades, politicians from all parties 
have linked social problems and government support with black, Latin, and 
Native American even though more white workers received the benefits. In the 
1980s when HIV ravaged black drug users, the government criminalized drug 
possession and provided jail cells. Now, when white workers overdose on the 
same drugs, they are offered (but not always given) treatment. How different it 
would be if white workers supported earlier harm reduction programs, like 
needle exchange and safe injection sites. Calling for prevention and treatment 
now that white workers suffer shows whose lives matter to the ruling class 
(although it doesn’t help any worker). 

Noted public health author, Dr. Camara P. Jones, discusses the deadly effects 
of racism on everyone, especially by cutting off the contributions of 
marginalized and oppressed people. Many articles on this blog demonstrate that 
racism doesn’t  benefit white workers. While white people are nowhere near as 
exploited and oppressed by racism, they suffer its consequences in very 
concrete ways, even if they are not aware of it. In her book, DiAngelo never 
indicates how harmful racism is to white people. “White people are the 
beneficiaries of that inequality and divisiveness.” In fact, she is part of the 
conversation that demands white people give up privilege. Antiracism is not a 
moral issue. It is material; it damages people in very concrete ways and in 
different degrees of intensity, such as housing security, Covid19, healthcare, 
and education. Do we really want white people to forgo treatment for Covid19 or 
do we want people to fight for treatment for everyone, prioritizing funding 
where the need is greatest? As Bill Sacks argues in another article:

“We have to hold in mind the definitions and implications of proportions and 
numbers: greater proportions of black working-class people are killed by cops 
or incarcerated, while greater numbers of white working-class people are killed 
by cops and incarcerated.
There is a difference between a right and a privilege: just because black 
(mainly) working-class people are denied a right does not turn it into a 
privilege for white working-class people; it’s still a right and a right 
denied.” (Multiracialunity.org, June 2020)
We need to win life sustaining rights for everyone.

How do we fight racism: some ideas

We can fight to improve our lives way beyond the level of white workers, 
especially those millions without health insurance or without a living wage. 
Overthrowing the current economic system or even reforming capitalism’s horrors 
requires huge numbers of people from all backgrounds. We need to embrace our 
working class membership. Instead of defining ourselves by different 
categories, we can appreciate our similarities. Billions of people work in a 
society where only a few garner most of the wealth we create. We can reject an 
emphasis on identities while still celebrating our differences and unite as 
workers with the potential to force change.

As we’ve witnessed from the massive uprisings today and past revolutionary and 
social movements, action and unity can accomplish changes in policies and 
social systems. The process of organizing and protesting forges relationships, 
connections with different issues, and lessons about who’s an ally, comrade, or 
enemy. Getting involved in union campaigns, community safety, and health issues 
trains people for bigger battles. In this context, people can learn in 
supportive environments to make racist and other harmful attitudes (anti-trans, 
sexism, xenophobia) visible and unacceptable. We can learn from each other.  It 
is gratifying to see the upsurge in multiracial actions among the public 
throughout the world. Let’s turn white fragility into antiracist agility!

References

California Newsreel. When the Bough Breaks: How Racism Impacts Birth Outcomes, 
2014. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUUJIG0-SlA

Crenshaw K. Framing Affirmative Action, 105 Mich. L. Rev. First Impressions 123 
(2006). Available at: http://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr_fi/vol105/iss1/4

International Reviews. 
https://www.amazon.com/White-Fragility-People-About-Racism, viewed on 6-27-2020)

Jones C. Racism and Health. American Public Health Association. 
https://www.apha.org/topics-and-issues/health-equity/racism-and-health, viewed 
6-1-2020.

Lozana C. White fragility is real. But ‘White Fragility’ is flawed. Washington 
Post Outlook section, June 18, 2020. 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/06/18/white-fragility-is-real-white-fragility-is-flawed/

Metzl J. Dying of Whiteness. Basic Books, 2020.

Novoa C. Exploring African Americans’ High Maternal and Infant Death Rates. 
2018. Center for American Progress. 
https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/early-childhood/reports/2018/02/01/445576/exploring-african-americans-high-maternal-infant-death-rates/

Sacks W. Antiracist Book Reviews. Multiracialunity.org. June 28, 2020. 
https://multiracialunity.org/2020/06/27/antiracist-book-reviews-working-class-unity-versus-white-privilege-2/#more-2786

Comrade or Ally? Book Review of : COMRADE, An Essay on Political Belonging by 
Jodi Dean
By Karyn Pomerantz, 6-12-2020 The uprisings over the horrendous oppression and 
killing of black people in the US have united people in ways we have rarely 
seen. Most protests in the past have been comprised of a single demographic 
group: mostly white in anti-war marches, Latin in immigration demonstrations, 
and…
In "Capitalism and Imperialism"
Antiracist Book Reviews: Working-Class Unity versus “White Privilege”
by Bill Sacks, retired physician, REVISED June 27, 2020 Black authors have 
written many nonfiction books on racism over the last decade. Mark Whitaker 
listed and commented on several in the Washington Post’s Outlook section (June 
14, 2020). He pointed out that Ta-Nehisi Coates’s Between the World and Me 
(2015)…
In "Blog Posts"

Racism Makes HALF TRILLION Dollar$ in Super-Profits for Capitalists: an 
Un(der)told Story
In "Blog Posts"

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#88): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/88
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/75879232/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES &amp; NOTES<br />#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when 
replying to a message.<br />#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly &amp; 
permanently archived.<br />#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a 
concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/1316126222/xyzzy  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to