Best regards,
Andrew Stewart 
- - -
Subscribe to the Washington Babylon newsletter via 
https://washingtonbabylon.com/newsletter/

Begin forwarded message:

> From: H-Net Staff via H-REVIEW <[email protected]>
> Date: August 17, 2020 at 9:20:18 AM EDT
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: H-Net Staff <[email protected]>
> Subject: H-Net Review [H-Early-America]:  McIlvenna on Witzig, 'Sanctifying 
> Slavery and Politics in South Carolina: The Life of the Reverend Alexander 
> Garden, 1685-1756'
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> 
> Fred E. Witzig.  Sanctifying Slavery and Politics in South Carolina: 
> The Life of the Reverend Alexander Garden, 1685-1756.  Columbia
> University of South Carolina Press, 2018.  xv + 235 pp.  $39.99 
> (cloth), ISBN 978-1-61117-846-3.
> 
> Reviewed by Noeleen McIlvenna (Wright State University)
> Published on H-Early-America (August, 2020)
> Commissioned by Kelly K. Sharp
> 
> McIlvenna on Witzig
> 
> In his biography of Alexander Garden, the minister who presided over 
> the most powerful parish in the eighteenth-century South, author Fred 
> Witzig characterizes Garden as a skillful servant of his society. As 
> the gatekeeper of righteousness, marking the boundaries of behavior 
> God would approve, "planters preferred that he err on their side when 
> drawing those lines, so he did" (p. 18). Witzig shows Garden in 
> context; when George Whitefield challenged southern planters, Garden 
> successfully defended them. While his slave school is presented as 
> perhaps a saving grace, there is nothing in that attempt to inculcate 
> obedience that salvages Garden's reputation. Southern white supremacy 
> found another pillar in his pulpit. 
> 
> We learn that Garden's life in Britain is largely unknown beyond his 
> Scottish birth and education. He came to Charles Town in 1720 and 
> died there in 1756, his tenure coinciding with the arrival of John 
> Wesley and Whitefield into Savannah and the launch of the Great 
> Awakening. Garden was assigned to Charles Town's St. Philip's parish, 
> which included the most magnificent church building in the South. As 
> with the rest of the beautiful architecture in the city, St. Philip's 
> church masked the corruption of its society. Witzig describes the 
> culture of colonial Charleston's "polite" society: the gentry class's 
> etiquette, their balls and horse races, and their discerning 
> palettes. As Charles Town's elite grew more powerful and more 
> expansionist, Garden married into this social circle, not only making 
> friends but also sanctioning the brutal violence of slavery. 
> "Discipline and Correction must be observed among every parcel of 
> Slaves, which ... may be, and often is, misrepresented ... as Cruelty 
> and bad Usage," Garden claimed (p. 55). 
> 
> Witzig's chief primary source materials included Garden's published 
> sermons and letters, many of Whitefield's papers as well as those of 
> the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel, the Bishop of London's 
> papers, and the _South Carolina Gazette. _The heavy dependency on 
> religious sources helps the nonreligious reader understand 
> theological divisions and how seemingly minor differences led to 
> great antagonisms. Witzig does a fine and useful job of clarifying 
> the theological divide between the Anglican pastor and his evangelist 
> opponent, which amounted to little but a conception of whether 
> salvation comes in a shattering moment of revelation or more slowly, 
> over a lifetime of prayer and devotion. A bigger gap lay between the 
> styles of Whitefield and Garden; the former was an electrifying 
> orator, while Charles Town's minister was an "unremarkable but solid 
> preacher" (p. 97). When Whitefield began to critique the sinfulness 
> of southern white polite society, especially their drinking and 
> dancing, Garden defended his parishioners and turned the accusations 
> back on Whitefield. "Had there appeared to me but half the Danger ... 
> from such Balls and Assemblies [as from] Mobb-Preachings ... building 
> up one another in the Conceit of their being righteous," he would 
> have intervened (p. 116). 
> 
> The most serious threat came from Whitefield's 1740 letter against 
> slaveholders, which was published in the wake of the Stono Rebellion. 
> Couched in terms that allowed for ownership of people, Whitefield 
> condemned the hunger and the violence visited upon enslaved people. 
> And, shortly after Stono, he dared brook the idea of a slave 
> uprising. "Should such a thing be permitted by providence, all good 
> men must acknowledge the judgment would be just." Of course, 
> Whitefield's strongest criticism was that enslaved African Americans 
> were kept "ignorant of Christianity" (p. 134). To that accusation, 
> Garden mounted his defense. He opened a slave school, where some 
> young enslaved men would be taught to read and interpret the Bible 
> and then would teach others, so that eventually each plantation might 
> have someone equipped to instruct enslaved children in the Gospel. 
> 
> A biography of the man who provided the South's most influential 
> slaveowners with a moral cushion on which to rest their consciences 
> is certainly important as we seek to understand the development of 
> white supremacy. Witzig asks us to consider Garden "in the 
> eighteenth-century world [he] inhabited, with all of its gritty moral 
> ambiguity" (p. 186), but few of us see ambiguity in the morality of 
> slavery. More than the other planters, the man who chooses the role 
> of pastor chooses the burden of defining for others what is 
> acceptable and modeling, as best a human can, ethical behavior. When 
> Garden's life is set alongside his eighteenth-century contemporary, 
> Benjamin Lay, the Pennsylvania Quaker, there can be no defense. 
> Marcus Rediker's recent biography of Lay reminds us that some were 
> brave and unselfish enough to come out loudly for abolition, prepared 
> to live the life of the humble Christ.[1] What is the measure of a 
> holy man who condones evil that enriches himself? Garden lived in a 
> corrupt society. And in taking the pulpit and abusing that power to 
> bolster slavery, he stands as the most corrupt of his world. 
> 
> Note 
> 
> [1]. Marcus Rediker, _The Fearless Benjamin Lay: The Quaker Dwarf who 
> became the First Revolutionary Abolitionist_ (Boston: Beacon Press, 
> 2017). 
> 
> Citation: Noeleen McIlvenna. Review of Witzig, Fred E., _Sanctifying 
> Slavery and Politics in South Carolina: The Life of the Reverend 
> Alexander Garden, 1685-1756_. H-Early-America, H-Net Reviews. August, 
> 2020.
> URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=55074
> 
> This work is licensed under a Creative Commons 
> Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States 
> License.
> 
> 

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#497): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/497
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/76244752/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES &amp; NOTES<br />#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when 
replying to a message.<br />#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly &amp; 
permanently archived.<br />#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a 
concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/1316126222/xyzzy  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to