I think that Reed's evaluation of C.L.R. James is unfair to James' full
life political trajectory.  I think that the most popular understandings of
James' politics suffer from anti-Marxist interpretations of James' later
years.  It has been a few years but i think of Farrukh Dhondy's biography
of James (Dhondy apparently was a primary caregiver for James in his last
years) where Dhondy tells of James' requests to help him hide from Black
nationalists who wanted to glom onto him.

I suggest this C.L.R. James statement as a response to Ernest Leif's
question:

The Revolutionary Answer to the Negro Problem in the US
by C.L.R. James, July 1948
https://www.marxists.org/archive/james-clr/works/1948/07/meyer.htm


On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 7:51 PM Ernestleif <[email protected]> wrote:

> To Max Power
>
> What do you present as an alternative strategy for Black people?
>
> To link up with the myriad white forces of revolution?
> > On Aug 23, 2020, at 9:38 PM, Max Power <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > A fantastic article by Adolph Reed, Jr. Whatever the failings of the
> DSA/Jacobin crowd, it’s to their credit that they give priority to Dr.
> Reed.
> >
> > “… a de facto alliance between ostensibly progressive identitarians and
> Wall Street Democrats has come together around asserting, along with Paul
> Krugman and others, that “horizontal inequality”—i.e., inequality between
> statistically defined racial/ethnic groups—is a more important problem than
> “vertical inequality,” characterized as inequality between individuals and
> households. That distinction instructively makes class and class inequality
> disappear, which is consistent with the trajectory of American liberalism
> across the more than seven decades since the end of World War II. Moreover,
> in a sort of mission creep, opponents of what they decry as a “class-first”
> position increasingly have come to denounce any expressions of concern for
> economic inequality as in effect catering to white supremacy. This
> tendency, which Touré Reed has argued rests on a race-reductionism,  has
> surfaced and spread within the newly revitalized Democratic Socialists of
> America (DSA), as even many among those who consider themselves socialists
> object to the organization’s selection of Medicare for All as its key
> political campaign on the ground that pursuit of decommodified health care
> for all is objectionable because doing so does not sufficiently center
> antiracist and anti-disparitarian agendas. I submit that there’s clearly a
> problem when anti-socialism is defined as socialism.”
> >
> >
> https://nonsite.org/editorial/what-materialist-black-political-history-actually-looks-like
> >
> >
>
>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#793): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/793
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/76377739/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES &amp; NOTES<br />#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when 
replying to a message.<br />#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly &amp; 
permanently archived.<br />#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a 
concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/1316126222/xyzzy  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to