I don’t care if she speaks in tongues; I am concerned about the authoritarian nature of the religious community she belongs to and its commitment to ‘male headship’, i.e., the idea that men should be in charge and women should follow and submit. But, yes, she will insist that none of this will affect her functioning as a Supreme Court judge and she will make her point well.
> On Sep 29, 2020, at 13:47, Louis Proyect <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 9/29/20 3:41 PM, wideangle wrote: >> It concerns me that ACB's nomination hearing might turn into something like >> an Inquisition trial, more concerned with interpretations of the Bible that >> the Constitution. > You can expect the same crap as all the other hearings. She, like Clarence > Thomas, et al, will affirm their commitment to an impartial and professional > evaluation of each and every case while the Democrats will try to catch her > up. Everybody knows that lawyers are trained to fend off such parries so any > lawyer good enough to make it this far will find it easy-going. > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#2065): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/2065 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/77198971/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
