Best regards,
Andrew Stewart 
- - -
Subscribe to the Washington Babylon newsletter via 
https://washingtonbabylon.com/newsletter/

Begin forwarded message:

> From: H-Net Staff via H-REVIEW <[email protected]>
> Date: September 30, 2020 at 5:44:25 PM EDT
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: H-Net Staff <[email protected]>
> Subject: H-Net Review [H-AmIndian]:  Blanton on Cobb, 'The Archaeology of 
> Southeastern Native American Landscapes of the Colonial Era'
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> 
> Charles R. Cobb.  The Archaeology of Southeastern Native American 
> Landscapes of the Colonial Era.  Gainesville  University Press of 
> Florida, 2019.  286 pp.  $90.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8130-6619-6.
> 
> Reviewed by Dennis B. Blanton (James Madison University)
> Published on H-AmIndian (September, 2020)
> Commissioned by F. Evan Nooe
> 
> Blanton on Cobb, The Archaeology of Southeastern Native American 
> Landscapes of the Colonial Era
> 
> The title of this book undersells the contents. Charles Cobb delivers 
> the promised examination of southeastern Indigenous landscapes, to be 
> sure, but he does so with an arresting authority derived from depth 
> of research, ambitious scope, wide relevance, and erudition. 
> Anthropologists, archaeologists, and historians with any measure of 
> interest in Native North America will do themselves--and the topic--a 
> disservice if they do not read and reflect upon what he has to say. 
> If it achieves nothing else, the book provides context essential for 
> understanding the contemporary Native American condition. 
> 
> Chronologically speaking, this work is focused on the interval 
> between the beginning of the sixteenth century and the close of the 
> nineteenth century. Theoretically, the point of departure for Cobb's 
> treatment of landscape is what he describes as neohistorical 
> anthropology. Over the course of seven chapters, he revels in the 
> complexity of the topic and gives explicit emphasis to historical 
> heterogeneity and cultural plurality. The merit of the perspective is 
> demonstrated by presentation of a series of what he refers to as 
> microhistories that concern groups like the Cherokee, Chickasaw, 
> Seminole, and Yamasee. The point is to demonstrate the essential 
> place of cultural relativism in any full and meaningful accounting of 
> Indigenous history. The author maintains success may be attained only 
> by deconstructing the interbraided range of contingent experiences. 
> 
> In these respects Cobb's is a distinctly bottom-up approach. Matters 
> of power, authority, and sovereignty emerge as basic and enduring 
> factors, but historically and geographically they tend to be 
> expressed in unique and divergent ways. Thus, what we are implored to 
> recognize and appreciate is the inherent diversity of Native 
> experience. Still, the facts of myriad experiences also telegraph the 
> persistent, unifying themes of innovation and creativity that account 
> for adaptive successes and historical continuities. 
> 
> Four "eventful dates" establish useful chronological guideposts in 
> the analysis, beginning with the establishment of St. Augustine in 
> 1565 and ending with events that followed the 1783 Treaty of Paris. 
> Then, toward the end, the author reflects on the effects of four 
> "pivot points." They represent bundles of related actions, driven by 
> occurrences like epidemic disease and the deerskin trade, that 
> explain fundamental changes, albeit unevenly. 
> 
> Central to Cobb's analysis is the fact of population movement through 
> the southeastern landscape. He reminds us that such events were not 
> only common--and for a long time--but most importantly, that they 
> were as intentional as they were forced. In this regard I found his 
> discussion of _emplacement_, the social production of spaces and 
> places, and _coalescence_, the successful and willful blending of 
> disparate groups, especially enlightening.
> 
> What readers will not find in Cobb's book are easy answers. Very 
> intentionally, he steers clear of positions that might be construed 
> as "reductionist." Instead, he succeeds in the express goal of 
> illuminating, via the lens of landscape, a history marked by healthy 
> doses of both fluidity and persistence. The story is complicated and 
> difficult, but it is also one of resilience and survival. 
> 
> Citation: Dennis B. Blanton. Review of Cobb, Charles R., _The 
> Archaeology of Southeastern Native American Landscapes of the 
> Colonial Era_. H-AmIndian, H-Net Reviews. September, 2020.
> URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=55367
> 
> This work is licensed under a Creative Commons 
> Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States 
> License.
> 
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#2114): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/2114
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/77227953/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES &amp; NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly &amp; permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to