[Edited Message Follows] Well, Mark, that's the subject of the Times article:
Since the violence of Jan. 6, progressive leaders have not deployed large-scale public protests at all. Interviews with nearly two dozen leaders involved in the effort, and a review of several hundred pages of planning documents, polling presentations and legal memorandums, revealed an uncommon — and previously unreported — degree of collaboration among progressive groups that often struggle to work so closely together because of competition over political turf, funding and conflicting ideological priorities. The whole point is the assertion that there are groups around the Democratic Party that can control the occurrence of mass demonstrations. This has nothing whatever to do with the body of officials elected on the DP ballot line or the confederation of organizations around elections. Burns claims that these groups are the movement behind BLM and the other demonstrating organizations, and he further asserts that the absence of such demonstrations demonstrates a controlling federation of such groups. I assume you are asserting that Burns is telling porkies or is simply wrong. If you think that Burns's article is not worth engaging, you might consider just saying that. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#5916): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/5916 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/80115690/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
