https://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/article/e/navalny-and-contratictions-putins-robber-capitalist-regime

Editorial
Navalny and the contradictions of Putin’s robber capitalist regime
Tuesday 02nd Feb 2021


A woman holds a banner with portraits of Russian President Vladimir Putin and 
reads ‘We're not gonna take it anymore! We are not afraid,’ during a protest 
against the jailing of opposition leader Alexei Navalny in Moscow
THE mainstream media — to give the official organs of the rich and powerful 
their polite name — is assiduously reporting what are fairly widespread 
demonstrations in Russia’s larger cities organised by supporters of the 
opposition figure Alexei Navalny.

This Navalny has recalibrated his appeal away from the highly contested 
spectrum of right-wing ultra-nationalist sentiment — inflected as it is in 
Russia with anti-semitism and Islamophobia — to give voice to complaints about 
the poverty, housing crises and general decay that inevitably accompanied 
Russia’s transition to capitalism.

Where Navalny projected himself — at least to his Western sponsors — as a human 
rights defender, a posture that is undoubtedly given substance by the maladroit 
manoeuvres of President Vladimir Putin’s police, today he aims to widen his 
tiny electoral base.

This is reckoned to be under 2 per cent and so far almost exclusively based 
around a stratum of upwardly mobile professionals and entrepreneurs who have 
emerged as winners in Russia’s post-socialist poverty lottery. 

The political strategy of Putin’s regime is to capture much of public opinion 
in a nationalist narrative of his own devising and use state power, patronage 
and full spectrum media dominance to marginalise opposition.

Such are the contradictions that capitalist restoration has created in this new 
Russia, that the insurgent forces always appear to be on the brink of breaking 
out of the system politics which keep electoral opposition at bay.

If such a “colour revolution” does take place under Navalny’s malign guidance, 
we can be sure it will threaten Russia’s existing capitalist relations of 
production only to open up its immense resources to foreign exploitation and to 
weaken Russia’s challenge to US power.

US President Joe Biden has met Putin and both sides have agreed to extend the 
remaining nuclear weapons deal. 

This is an unalloyed benefit and, as the Kremlin statement put it: “The 
normalisation of relations between Russia and the United States would meet the 
interests of both countries and — taking into account their special 
responsibility for maintaining security and stability in the world — of the 
entire international community.”

Much of the US Democrats’ misplaced election rhetoric has centred on 
allegations that Russia meddled in US elections and, if only for the sake of 
continuity, the US presentation of this first encounter between the two 
presidents has foregrounded this allegation.

Attach what significance you may to CIA intelligence reports that Russia 
deliberately interfered with the November election in order to get Donald Trump 
elected. 

They might have more force if any conclusive evidence was made available. And 
they might be taken more seriously by a global audience if, setting aside its 
long history of invasion and military coups, the US was not credited with 
interfering in more than 80 elections since the second world war.

If true, then Putin must have a tray of medals to hand out. But in fact the 
system politics which has kept US foreign policy broadly bipartisan for decades 
is in deep trouble. As is the US economy. 

All the evidence suggests that it was Trump’s ham-fisted handling of the 
Covid-19 pandemic which did for his re-election bid and without this his 77.3 
million voter base might have been enough to win again.

Biden treads on dangerous ground. Three years ago the National Security Archive 
at George Washington University revealed 30 declassified documents detailing 
assurances given to the Soviets. 

The then US secretary of state James Baker promised the hapless Mikhail 
Gorbachov that Nato would expand “not one inch eastward.”

Currently Nato troops, including British forces, are deployed along Russia’s 
eastern borders. Better they should be brought home and further nuclear arms 
reductions take place.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#6078): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/6078
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/80361481/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to