Way back in the early 1980s, when neoliberalism was just taking over, Andre
Gunder Frank was at a conference at Cambridge University on "new orthodoxy
in economics" --- he argued (prematurely it turned out) that when
neo-liberalism failed (we weren't calling it that back then) the capitalist
nations would turn to "capitalist planning."   That's what "industrial
policy" is --- Japan's version took a hit with the Japanese economy's
stagnation in the late 1980s and 1990s --- but in fact, China's economic
success is definitely a case of "capitalist" planning ---

I think there is a good part of the American elite that has throw in its
lots with the "capitalist planners" --- the left needs to push it towards
more income redistribution and more rules cutting (ending?) pollution and
dependence on fossil fuels -- but (if we want to be optimistic) there is a
merging of interests between the Green capitalist planners and those
supporting the Green New Deal (for one example) ---

Biden will need the left to push through his agenda --- he will have to
throw us some things (like going big on relief) --

TO BE CONTINUED

(the article is long but well worth reading)

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:15 PM Andrew Stewart <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Who here actually believes this? Really? Or is it bullshit?
>
>
> The Biden Team Wants to Transform the Economy. Really.
>
> https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/11/magazine/biden-economy.html?referringSource=articleShare
>
>
>
>


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#6296): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/6296
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/80562826/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES &amp; NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly &amp; permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to