Best regards,
Andrew Stewart

Begin forwarded message:

> From: H-Net Staff via H-REVIEW <[email protected]>
> Date: March 25, 2021 at 9:57:38 AM EDT
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: H-Net Staff <[email protected]>
> Subject: H-Net Review [H-War]:  McGuffie on Genay, 'Land of Nuclear 
> Enchantment: A New Mexican History of the Nuclear Weapons Industry'
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> 
> Lucie Genay.  Land of Nuclear Enchantment: A New Mexican History of 
> the Nuclear Weapons Industry.  Albuquerque  University of New Mexico 
> Press, 2019.  344 pp.  $65.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8263-6013-7.
> 
> Reviewed by Joshua McGuffie (UCLA)
> Published on H-War (March, 2021)
> Commissioned by Margaret Sankey
> 
> Los Alamos, a shining laboratory city upon a hill. Alamogordo, the 
> test site in the heart of an inhospitable desert wasteland. Sandia
> Labs, a weapons assembly line at home amid Albuquerque's suburban 
> sprawl. Countless adits and shafts dotting the hills, gateways into 
> vast uranium deposits near towns like Grants and Shiprock. The Waste 
> Isolation Pilot Plant, a great tomb for transuranic waste bored out 
> of a massive subterranean salt formation. More pervasively than any 
> other state, New Mexico bears the imprint of American atomic 
> aspirations on its landscape. 
> 
> In _Land of Nuclear Enchantment_ Lucie Genay crafts an overtly 
> nuclear history of New Mexico. She relies on oral histories, using a 
> host of personal reflections and reminiscences to move her narrative 
> along. Genay brings an outsider's sensibilities to the work. She left 
> her native France to spend a year studying in the state. The 
> University of New Mexico put its mark on her project. Many of her 
> oral histories come from the university's 1991 "Impact Los Alamos:
> Traditional New Mexico in the High Tech World" project, directed by 
> Carlos Vásquez. Of all the book's contributions to the literature, 
> the broad swath of firsthand stories stands out.
> 
> Genay thinks in terms of conquest and colonization to do her 
> analytical work. In her scheme, the labs, factories, mines, and 
> repositories that dot the New Mexican landscape make up the material 
> stuff of a scientific conquest. The social and economic interactions 
> between New Mexicans--Native American, Hispano, and Anglo--and the 
> nuclear émigrés to the state exist in a colonial framework in which 
> "the federal government ... imposed outcomes according to the logics 
> of military priorities" (p. 14). Thinking in this way, Genay stands 
> squarely in the tradition of new Western historians working to 
> spotlight men and women who have been left out of canonical 
> histories. "Local residents," she reminds her readers, "have 
> contributed to the success of the Labs, to the profits made by the 
> uranium industry ... to America's military supremacy, and to the 
> advancement of science" (p. 5).
> 
> The story starts out rosy enough. Genay walks her readers through New
> Mexico's agrarian past. Then she explains how Native Americans living 
> in pueblos in the Española Valley and Hispano farmers, whose 
> ancestors came to the New World when Madrid governed the territory, 
> experienced economic opportunities when Los Alamos opened. Of course, 
> these locals never could compete for top-flight jobs "on the Hill." 
> Still, federal largesse--the nuclear golden goose--meant employment 
> and stability. South of the vaunted lab, Anglo ranchers gave up their 
> homesteads for the expanding White Sands Proving Ground with the 
> promise of compensation and an eventual postwar return to their 
> property. In their loss, many felt they were doing their patriotic 
> duty.
> 
> The July 16, 1945, Trinity Test made wartime contingencies permanent. 
> Ranchers learned they would not go home. Los Alamos grew, drawing a 
> new host of scientists  to the site. Sandia Lab popped up on the edge 
> of Albuquerque to complement Los Alamos. The atom and its social 
> consequences were in New Mexico to stay.
> 
> But the lustrous new nuclear installations quickly tarnished under 
> the desert sun. Genay documents how, for Native American and Hispano
> workers at Los Alamos, the lack of opportunity for them and their 
> children to move up in the corporate structure began to displace a 
> sense that the lab had lifted them out of agrarian poverty. Even as 
> educational opportunities opened up for local New Mexicans in the 
> 1950s, a feeling of inferiority remained when they compared 
> themselves to the Anglos recruited from out of state to work at the 
> lab.
> 
> As the decades passed, new health and environmental concerns became 
> part and parcel of the atomic project in New Mexico. Native American 
> uranium miners and millers in the west of the state began to get 
> sick. Children who grew up near Alamogordo experienced uncommon 
> cancers. New cancers cropped up around Los Alamos too, where children 
> played in old waste dumps with names like Acid Canyon. Workers whose 
> economic livelihoods relied on the atomic establishment began to ask 
> questions. Many received unsatisfying answers from lab administrators 
> and federal nuclear bureaucrats. Genay recounts one Native American 
> worker at Los Alamos saying, "in the old days, LANL [Los Alamos 
> National Laboratory] workers were given cigarettes at pay day, sort 
> of like a bonus. Now, the Lab blames the cancer on the smoking" (p. 
> 185).
> 
> Genay's story is ultimately one of disenchantment with the nuclear 
> program and its constellation of labs, plants, test sites, mines, and 
> waste dumps across New Mexico. Proponents of the nuclear program will 
> likely find fault with her ultimate analysis that its costs outweigh 
> its benefits. Nuclear detractors will find a welcome addition to the 
> literature. Regardless of the reader's viewpoint, Genay's 
> contribution of so many oral histories in this piece enhances the 
> depth and breadth of atomic history in New Mexico and the West.
> 
> Citation: Joshua McGuffie. Review of Genay, Lucie, _Land of Nuclear 
> Enchantment: A New Mexican History of the Nuclear Weapons Industry_. 
> H-War, H-Net Reviews. March, 2021.
> URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=56066
> 
> This work is licensed under a Creative Commons 
> Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States 
> License.
> 
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#7512): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/7512
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/81604486/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES &amp; NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly &amp; permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to