On 4/3/21 2:28 PM, Kaiwen Dong wrote:

[Edited Message Follows]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSGIqXkJYCA <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSGIqXkJYCA>

On April 2nd, 2021, the Platypus Affiliated Society hosted a virtual panel on "The Legacy of Trotskyism" as part of the 2021 Platypus International Convention. In 2011 at its third international convention, the Platypus Affiliated Society hosted a plenary discussion titled "The Legacy of Trotskyism." That panel's introduction specifically mentioned the Socialist Workers Party (UK), International Socialist Organization (USA), and New Anticapitalist Party (France) as contemporary representatives of Trotskyism. Since 2011, all three groups have significantly declined, or collapsed outright. The smaller Trotskyist sects, once a familiar sight outside socialist and trade union meetings, seem unable to replace their aging membership through recruitment and face the prospect of their long-term leaders passing away without a new generation prepared to continue their mission. The current generation of Left activists, whether inspired by social democracy or "new social movements," seem to have bypassed Trotskyism entirely, in contrast to the 2001-2008 antiwar movement, which drew heavily on existing organizations' experience and discipline.

I doubt if I'll be sufficiently motivated to watch this video but would only offer this thought about Trotskyism. Trotsky's ideas, like Bukharin's and other important Marxist thinkers, will live on as part of the legacy of our movement broadly speaking going back to Marx and Engels. The collapse of the groups enumerated above has more to do with an organizational model that goes back to the Fifth Comintern Congress in 1924 that adopted "Bolshevization", Zinoviev's mechanical version of Lenin's party. It imposed a "democratic centralism" that led to sect formations and then to cults.

Organizational methods have to flow from the living class struggle and cannot be turned into formulas. The task facing the left in the USA is to build a revolutionary party that is much looser than the groups mentioned above but is far tighter than the DSA, which in many ways is a paper organization. As for its 90,000 members, I doubt that much more than 10,000 are committed activists. If we had 10,000 activists in a left group that had the kind of militancy of the SWP and the ISO in their heyday, it would shake the USA to its foundations, especially if it ran openly socialist candidates rather than tail-ending liberals who called themselves "socialists".



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#7726): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/7726
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/81830233/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES &amp; NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly &amp; permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to