Best regards,
Andrew Stewart

Begin forwarded message:

> From: H-Net Staff via H-REVIEW <[email protected]>
> Date: May 14, 2021 at 10:36:21 PM EDT
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: H-Net Staff <[email protected]>
> Subject: H-Net Review [H-Buddhism]:  Osburg on Esler, 'Tibetan Buddhism among 
> Han Chinese: Mediation and Superscription of the Tibetan Tradition in 
> Contemporary Chinese Society'
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> 
> Joshua Esler.  Tibetan Buddhism among Han Chinese: Mediation and 
> Superscription of the Tibetan Tradition in Contemporary Chinese 
> Society.  Lanham  Lexington Books, 2020.  266 pp.  $115.00 (cloth), 
> ISBN 978-1-4985-8464-7.
> 
> Reviewed by John Osburg (University of Rochester)
> Published on H-Buddhism (May, 2021)
> Commissioned by Jessica Zu
> 
> Starting around the late 1990s, Tibetan Buddhism experienced a surge 
> in popularity in Han Chinese communities throughout the Sinophone 
> world and, it continues to attract growing numbers of Chinese 
> followers to this day. While previous studies of this phenomenon have 
> focused either on Taiwan, Hong Kong, or the PRC exclusively,[1] 
> Joshua Esler's_ Tibetan Buddhism among Han Chinese: Meditation and 
> Superscription of the Tibetan Tradition in Contemporary Chinese 
> Society_ provides a detailed ethnographic study of Tibetan Buddhist 
> practitioners in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the mainland. Esler is 
> primarily interested in the ways in which Tibetan Buddhist principles 
> and practices interact with other religious forms in these different 
> locations, including Chinese folk religion, "pragmatic" 
> Protestantism, and the PRC's Confucian revival, and how these 
> traditions influence Tibetan Buddhism in turn. Through Esler's 
> detailed theological conversations with his interlocuters at multiple 
> field sites, we gain a sense of the diverse interpretations and modes 
> of engagement Han Chinese practitioners have with Tibetan 
> Buddhism--from those who attempt to faithfully emulate the 
> "culturally Tibetan" aspects of Tibetan Buddhism to those who adhere 
> to a more stripped-down, modernized "self-help" version of Buddhist 
> practice. 
> 
> Esler employs Prasenjit Duara's notion of superscription to account 
> for the ways in which Tibetan Buddhism has "been layered or 
> superscribed with new meaning by both Tibetan monastics and Chinese 
> practitioners as it encounters scientific rationalism and other 
> modernizing forces as well as a traditional Chinese cosmology of 
> gods, ghosts, and ancestors in modern China" (p. xvi). For example, 
> chapter 2 focuses on the Karmapa's incorporation of the Chinese folk 
> deity Guan Gong into the Karma Kagyu school as a protector deity. 
> Esler examines how different practitioners further layer their own 
> meanings upon this superscription, with some interpreting Guan Gong 
> as a protector deity while others view him as a Boddhisattva, an 
> emanation of Gesar, the legendary warrior-king, or some combination 
> of the three. 
> 
> The first chapter provides an extremely useful overview of the recent 
> growth in Han Chinese Tibetan Buddhist practitioners, outlining both 
> the pre-1949 history of Sino-Tibetan religious engagement as well as 
> parallels between Chinese disgruntlement with post-Mao economic 
> development and a similarly disaffected Western 1960s counterculture. 
> Both groups came to view Tibetan Buddhism as offering a kind of 
> "primordial purity" (p. 27) untainted by the ills of modernity and 
> thus uniquely capable of curing those very ills. In the remaining 
> chapters, Esler draws on both secondary scholarly sources as well as 
> his own ethnographic data drawn from multiple fieldsites including 
> Beijing, Gyalthang (in Xianggelila, "Shangrila" county), Hong Kong, 
> and Taipei. He interviews more than eighty individuals, including 
> stressed-out Hong Kong professionals and bohemian Chinese artists who 
> have fled the rat race. While the voices and perspectives of Han 
> Chinese practitioners are dominant in the book, we also hear from 
> Tibetan monks and occasionally from lay Tibetans as well. The 
> multiple fieldsites from which Esler analyzes the diversity of 
> engagements with Tibetan Buddhism are one of the strengths of the 
> book. Yet I found myself wanting a little more contextualization of 
> Tibetan Buddhism in these various sites. For example, Esler views 
> Tibetan Buddhism in Hong Kong through the lens of pragmatism and 
> materialism, a characterization many would apply to most PRC 
> citizens' appropriation of Tibetan Buddhism as well. (Esler 
> acknowledges that this more pragmatically oriented group was not 
> represented in his study.) While some of the personal tribulations 
> that propel people to find solace in Buddhism--such as loss of a 
> loved one, marital strife, and work stress--seem similar across all 
> three locations, Tibetan Buddhism's role as a critique of state 
> narratives of development and material progress (outlined in the 
> introduction) is perhaps less salient in Hong Kong and Taiwan than it 
> is on the mainland. While Esler is attuned to the harsh regulation 
> surrounding Tibetan Buddhism in the PRC, one wonders how the 
> relatively freer religious ecosystems of Hong Kong and Taiwan have 
> impacted Tibetan Buddhism's spread there. 
> 
> Another strength of the book is Esler's historical overviews of 
> Tibetan Buddhism's interactions with other religious traditions in 
> China (as well as its current debates with state Marxism), which are 
> evenly distributed throughout the text. This makes the book 
> accessible to those with little background in Buddhist studies 
> (Tibetan or otherwise) or Chinese history. One of Esler's more 
> intriguing findings is how Han Chinese engagement with Tibetan 
> Buddhism often serves as "gateway" toward interest in Chinese 
> religious traditions and sometimes traditional Chinese culture as 
> well, leading some followers to adopt a syncretic blend of Buddhism 
> and Confucianism. Yet, for other practitioners, Tibetan Buddhism (and 
> Tibetan culture in general) possess a purity and authenticity forever 
> lost from Chinese traditions. In his chapter on Tibetan landscape 
> deities and "geopiety," he shows that while some practitioners 
> interpret these beliefs through a traditional Chinese cosmology or 
> through a modernized lens, others embrace these beliefs in their 
> entirety as part of a larger project of "approximating the Tibetan 
> other by dressing, acting, and performing like this other" (p. 162). 
> Many Han Chinese who relocate to Tibetan towns fall into this 
> category, with some even asserting that they were Tibetan in a past 
> life. 
> 
> In short, _Tibetan Buddhism among Han Chinese_ provides the best 
> overview to date of the contemporary wave of Han Chinese engagement 
> with Tibetan Buddhism. The book is clearly written and is easily 
> accessible to an upper-level undergraduate audience. Given the 
> relatively sparse scholarly treatment of this subject to date, it 
> should be read by scholars of Tibetan Buddhism and Chinese religion 
> interested in this complex field of inter-religious and intercultural 
> encounters. Given the profound financial influence Han Chinese 
> patrons exert over Tibetan Buddhism, it is an encounter that will, 
> for better or worse, likely shape the trajectory of Tibetan Buddhism 
> in the years to come. 
> 
> Note 
> 
> [1]. For example, Alison Jones, "Contemporary Han Chinese Involvement 
> in Tibetan Buddhism: A Case Study from Nanjing" _Social Compass_ 58, 
> no. 4 (2011): 540-53; Dan Smyer Yü, _The Spread of Tibetan Buddhism 
> in China _(New York: Routledge, 2021); Abraham Zablocki, "The 
> Taiwanese Connection: Politics, Piety, and Patronage in Transnational 
> Tibetan Buddhism," in _Buddhism between Tibet and China, _ed. Matthew 
> Kapstein (Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2009); and Yinong Zhang, 
> "Between Nation and Religion: The Sino-Tibetan Buddhist Network in 
> Post-Reform China," _Chinese Sociological Review_ 45, no. 1 (2012): 
> 55-69. 
> 
> Citation: John Osburg. Review of Esler, Joshua, _Tibetan Buddhism 
> among Han Chinese: Mediation and Superscription of the Tibetan 
> Tradition in Contemporary Chinese Society_. H-Buddhism, H-Net 
> Reviews. May, 2021.
> URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=56552
> 
> This work is licensed under a Creative Commons 
> Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States 
> License.
> 
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#8571): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/8571
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/82839397/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES &amp; NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly &amp; permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to