---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: H-Net Staff via H-REVIEW <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, May 17, 2021 at 1:12 PM
Subject: H-Net Review [H-Atlantic]: Mewett on Tibbles, 'Liverpool and the
Slave Trade'
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: H-Net Staff <[email protected]>


Anthony Tibbles.  Liverpool and the Slave Trade.  Liverpool
Liverpool University Press, 2018.  Illustrations, maps. ix + 118 pp.
$29.95 (paper), ISBN 978-1-78694-153-4.

Reviewed by Ryan E. Mewett (Johns Hopkins University)
Published on H-Atlantic (May, 2021)
Commissioned by Bryan Rindfleisch

The Town the Slave Traders Built

Public discussion of Britain's complicity in the transatlantic slave
trade has surged over the last year alongside global demonstrations
for racial justice following the murder of George Floyd. Impelled by
local activism, communities have moved forward with plans to remove
or modify statues and rename streets commemorating slave traders and
plantation owners in Bristol, London, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Cardiff,
and Liverpool. This flurry of awareness breaks from a long trend in
which British participation in the slave trade--and the economic
gains reaped from it--has been, according to Anthony Tibbles, "for
most of the last two hundred years ... ignored, downplayed or
forgotten, not least in Liverpool." In his career as a museum
professional, Tibbles has figured prominently in attempts to pierce
this cloud of ignorance. He led the development of the Transatlantic
Slavery Gallery at the Merseyside Maritime Museum (1994), curated the
initial content of Liverpool's International Slavery Museum (2007),
and since 2009 has been Emeritus Keeper of Slavery History for
National Museums Liverpool. His aim in _Liverpool and the Slave
Trade_ is to continue that work and "document Liverpool's prominent
role in the trade," raising awareness of the slave trade's
significant place in British history and its enduring legacy in the
British present (p. vii). The product of his efforts is a compact,
generously illustrated volume that is readable, engaging, and
informative. Across six chapters, Tibbles synthesizes recent research
and uses primary sources to provide a vivid exploration of
Liverpool's participation in the transatlantic slave trade.

Tibbles begins with a brief overview of the transatlantic slave trade
as a whole and narrates the steady growth of Liverpool's involvement,
followed by the first chapter that details the introduction of the
plantation system into the Americas, its adoption by Britons in the
Caribbean colonies, and the role of the Royal African Company within
the slave trade. Liverpudlians joined in the trade soon after the
company's monopoly on British trade to Africa ended in 1698, but
participation remained sporadic until after the War of the Spanish
Succession. From this gradual beginning, though, Liverpool grew to
dominate the British slave trade. The town launched more than half of
British slaving voyages after 1750 and 80 percent from 1780 until the
abolition of the trade in 1807. In this chapter, Tibbles also
discusses the system of British slavery more broadly, describing the
conditions of plantation slavery and noting the economic and
political power of absentee plantation owners in metropolitan
Britain. Finally, a summary of Liverpool's opposition to abolition
and post-1807 links to Africa and Atlantic slavery concludes the
chapter.

The second chapter focuses on slave trading enterprises and the ways
Liverpool came to be deeply engaged with each aspect of the trade.
For instance, the town's shipbuilders constructed one-quarter of the
British vessels involved in slaving, and artisans and tradesmen of
all varieties participated in outfitting and provisioning those
voyages. But "a core group of some 200 merchants"--many of whom
exercised significant political power, both locally and
nationally--provided the capital and dominated decision-making (p.
12). These merchants typically combined in short-term partnerships
and elected one of their members to actively manage the details of a
voyage. Investment in a given voyage was divided into sixty-four
shares, and as many as 1,400 small-scale investors purchased
occasional single shares and operated as silent partners during the
period of Liverpool's dominance in the slave trade. The town and its
hinterland provided much of the cargo carried to Africa in exchange
for slaves: textiles from Manchester, metals from the northwest and
north Wales, guns from Birmingham, knives from Sheffield, salt from
Cheshire, and sundry items imported from as far afield as the Baltic,
Italy, and India. The captain hired for a voyage often played a
critical role in cargo selection; the most experienced were valued by
the merchants for their specialized knowledge of and relationships in
particular African markets. Like the cargo, a majority of the crew
was drawn from Liverpool and its environs, with the balance made up
of sizable minorities of Scots, Irishmen, and foreigners.

In chapter 3, Tibbles examines the slaving voyage itself. The
merchant shipowners provided their captain with detailed instructions
but depended on his experience and judgment to ensure profitable
trading on the African coast. In the course of several months at one
or more slaving ports, the captain negotiated purchases of enslaved
people singly or in small lots, customizing a suitable assortment of
goods to exchange for each person. One characteristic voyage saw a
captain engage in "over 2,000 rounds of negotiations in order to
purchase 499 slaves in 316 transactions on 131 separate days from
fifty-four different traders" during a six-month period at Old
Calabar in modern-day Nigeria (p. 34). Tibbles describes the personal
relationships formed between many Liverpool slavers and African
traders, especially in Old Calabar; some Calabary merchants even
trusted their sons to Liverpudlians to be educated in England. More
generally, the chapter reflects the influence of modern scholarship
that emphasizes African power and agency within the slave trade.[1]
The account of the Middle Passage is similarly inflected; it takes
African resistance seriously and details the measures slavers took to
suppress revolts, alongside discussion of the brutal conditions of
the slave ship and the violence inflicted by the crew against the
enslaved. But the perspective here is largely informed by written
evidence from slave ship officers--as elsewhere in the book--and as a
result the reader's viewpoint is distinctly that of the European
slavers.[2]

Chapter 4 considers the possible causes of Liverpool's dominance in
the slave trade and--at greater length--its economic impact.
Historians have offered a variety of explanations to account for the
town's ascendancy in the trade beginning in the 1740s, and Tibbles
briefly discusses several: the specialist knowledge and high entry
cost required for slaving voyages, the development of personal
contacts in Africa, the unique access to trade goods provided by
Liverpool's environs, and Liverpool merchants' unique risk-taking and
entrepreneurial energies. The longest part of the chapter is taken up
with evaluating how Liverpool profited from the slave trade. As a
visitor to the town in 1772 rebuked its residents, "there is not a
brick in your dirty town but what is cemented with the blood of a
negro" (p. 65). Though Tibbles cautions that it is impossible to
precisely calculate how much of Liverpool's mercantile wealth
resulted specifically from the slave trade, he leaves little doubt
that it was a massive sum. Slave merchants were the wealthiest men in
the town; they built country houses and endowed civic institutions.
The profits spread widely enough throughout the town's economy that
artisans of all kinds vigorously opposed abolition in the 1780s.
Although he notes that "at least 40 per cent of Liverpool's wealth at
this time derived from slave-related activities" and mentions several
examples of industrial development directly linked to Liverpudlian
slaving activities, Tibbles concludes the chapter with the caveat
that among economic historians "the consensus seems to be" that the
profits of slavery did not launch the Industrial Revolution (pp. 75,
77).

The last two chapters are concerned with Liverpool's role in the
campaign for abolition and its economic fortunes in the nineteenth
century after abolition. Unsurprisingly, few residents backed
abolition as compared to other large towns, but Tibbles contends that
the issue rarely created enough tension to strain social and familial
bonds. Many Liverpool slavers contributed to the abolition debate in
Parliament. Merchants and officers testified in defense of the trade,
while sailors' accounts of cruelty and deprivation formed a
significant body of evidence for the abolitionists. By contrast,
Liverpool had little involvement in the debate leading up to
emancipation in 1834, as few planters had links to the town. And the
dire impact to Liverpool's economy that some predicted would follow
in the wake of abolition never occurred. While a few merchants became
involved in the illicit slave trade, many more adapted their African
trading ventures into new commodities, like ivory and palm oil.
Liverpool traders also expanded their activities in the Caribbean and
North America. Eventually, the town flourished as the entrepĂ´t for
slave-grown American cotton flowing to the textile mills of
Lancashire, and "by 1850 raw cotton imports and manufactured cotton
goods comprised half of all Liverpool's trade" (p. 102). In
conclusion, Tibbles discusses two aspects of the slave trade's legacy
in Liverpool: its Black community and the recent but stuttering
efforts to challenge the historical amnesia around the trade. Tibbles
also concludes on a note of ambivalence borne out by the events of
the past year that while "the city has begun to acknowledge that
uncomfortable past in recent years, it has yet to find a satisfactory
way of living with that legacy" (p. 110).

On the whole the book is valuable and engaging. Tibbles does an
excellent job of translating research with a substantial quantitative
component into a fluid summary. Though clearly written for a general
audience, the book is not simply descriptive; it addresses
historiography and makes arguments (if only with a light touch).
Several of the most appealing elements of the book seem connected to
Tibbles's background in museum work, as the reader is consistently
brought to the material through specific people and objects. Frequent
sidebars offer biographical sketches of relevant characters--some
representative, some unique--like Black sailor John Jones, Calabary
merchant Antera Duke, and slaveowner Sir John Gladstone, father of
the prime minister. Similarly, insightful anecdotes drawn from
primary sources in the Liverpool Record Office and the Merseyside
Maritime Museum are woven skillfully throughout the main text. The
book is beautifully and extensively illustrated with two maps and
sixty-six images, including reproductions of paintings, engravings,
and photos of artifacts and manuscript documents, primarily from the
collections at National Museums Liverpool. The excellent bibliography
will be useful to readers looking for more comprehensive treatments
of topics discussed in the text.[3]

The book has one minor flaw. Perhaps due to its somewhat unique
format and its target audience, the referencing is sometimes less
comprehensive than one might wish. Specific statistics, quotations,
illustrative anecdotes, and the like are invariably given a footnote,
but sometimes general fact claims are not. Specialist readers thereby
may be frustrated by their inability to follow specific claims to
their source.

_Liverpool and the Slave Trade_ is altogether an impressive work that
will be useful to a broad range of readers. Even leaving aside its
many fine qualities, the excellent images alone make it a valuable
addition to a specialist's library. Readers generally acquainted with
the transatlantic slave trade will also value the Liverpool-specific
aspects of every chapter, and it will serve as an engaging
introductory volume for undergraduates, general readers, and all
Liverpudlians.

Notes

[1]. For example, Randy J. Sparks, _Where the Negroes Are Masters: An
African Port in the Era of the Slave Trade_ (Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press, 2004); and Paul E. Lovejoy and David Richardson,
"African Agency and the Liverpool Slave Trade," in _Liverpool and
Transatlantic Slavery_, ed. David Richardson, Suzanne Schwarz, and
Anthony Tibbles (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2007), 43-65.

[2]. Works in Middle Passage studies often employ the same sources in
ways that manage to minimize the voice of European elites and keep
the lens squarely on the experience of enslaved people. See, for
example, Marcus Rediker, _The Slave Ship: A Human History_ (New York:
Viking, 2007); Stephanie Smallwood, _Saltwater Slavery: A Middle
Passage from Africa to American Diaspora_ (Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press, 2007); and Sowande' M. Mustakeem, _Slavery at Sea:
Terror, Sex, and Sickness in the Middle Passage_ (Urbana: University
of Illinois Press, 2016).

[3]. Richardson, Schwarz, and Tibbles, eds., _Liverpool and
Transatlantic Slavery_ is an ideal companion volume.

Citation: Ryan E. Mewett. Review of Tibbles, Anthony, _Liverpool and
the Slave Trade_. H-Atlantic, H-Net Reviews. May, 2021.
URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=55321

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States
License.




-- 
Best regards,

Andrew Stewart


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#8612): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/8612
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/82893665/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES &amp; NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly &amp; permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to