Best regards,
Andrew Stewart

Begin forwarded message:

> From: H-Net Staff via H-REVIEW <[email protected]>
> Date: June 3, 2021 at 2:01:27 AM EDT
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: H-Net Staff <[email protected]>
> Subject: H-Net Review [H-Buddhism]:  Pearcey on Bayer, 'The Life and Works of 
> mKhan-po gZhan-dga' (1871-1927): rDzogs-chen Master and Educational Reformer 
> of Eastern Tibet'
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> 
> Achim Bayer.  The Life and Works of mKhan-po gZhan-dga' (1871-1927): 
> rDzogs-chen Master and Educational Reformer of Eastern Tibet.
> Hamburg Buddhist Studies. Bochum  Projekt Verlag, 2019.  xxi + 394 
> pp.  $39.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-3-89733-495-3.
> 
> Reviewed by Adam Pearcey (Independent Scholar)
> Published on H-Buddhism (June, 2021)
> Commissioned by Lucia Galli
> 
> Achim Bayer's _The Life and Works of mKhan-po gZhan-dga' (1871-1927): 
> rDzogs-chen Master and Educational Reformer of Eastern Tibet_ 
> provides a comprehensive account of the life and literary output of 
> gZhan-phan chos-kyi-snang-ba, one of the most significant figures in 
> recent Tibetan Buddhist history. As the subtitle indicates, 
> gZhan-dga', as he is generally known, is remembered chiefly for his 
> reform of monastic education in eastern Tibet in the early decades of 
> the twentieth century. He brought about this reform through his role 
> as a teacher and founder of scriptural colleges (Tib. _bshad grwa_) 
> where he instituted a curriculum centered on the so-called thirteen 
> major treatises, or thirteen great texts (_gzhung chen bcu gsum_). 
> 
> Bayer's book, adapted from his master's thesis (University of 
> Hamburg, 2000), is divided into three parts: the first covers 
> gZhan-dga's  life in more or less chronological order; the second 
> discusses his "gloss commentaries" (_mchan 'grel_) to the thirteen 
> major treatises in detail, as well as his minor writings; and the 
> third provides the Tibetan text (in transliteration) of some key 
> sources. Appendices then offer a wealth of additional information, 
> including details on gZhan-dga's ordination lineage and biographical 
> notes on no fewer than seventy-three of his main disciples. 
> 
> The author is under no illusion as to the challenges of accurately 
> piecing together and conveying gZhan-dga's life story. In the absence 
> of a single, book-length biography in Tibetan--the long-searched-for 
> _namthar_ (_rnam thar_) attributed to his student mKhyen-rab Chos-kyi 
> 'Od-zer (1889-1959) is presumed lost, if it ever existed at 
> all--Bayer is compelled to rely on a variety of sources, including 
> accounts from the master's contemporaries and interviews with more 
> recent representatives of his lineage. The large number of sources 
> consulted, both written and oral, is impressive and results in an 
> engaging narrative. There is some inevitable disagreement between 
> sources, as well as a general reluctance to discuss topics that might 
> be deemed inauspicious, such as gZhan-dga's apparent antipathy toward 
> the extrinsic emptiness or emptiness-of-other (_gzhan stong_) 
> philosophy, which proved controversial during his tenure at 
> dPal-spungs Monastery. Bayer thus offers what he refers to as "a 
> possible sequence of events," noting discrepancies in the historical 
> record and suggesting possible motives for omissions (p. 25). This 
> approach is not without its perils, and some stories from the oral 
> tradition, in particular, have perhaps been accepted without 
> sufficient caution. The reference to mKhyen-brtse'i-dbang-po 
> (1820-92), rDza dPal-sprul (1808-87), and 'Jam-mgon Kong-sprul 
> (1813-99) as "three dorm mates" during their studies at Zhe-chen, for 
> instance, is closer to what might be termed "Ris-med fan fiction" 
> than it is to a reliable chronicling of events (p. 5). 
> 
> Following E. Gene Smith and others, Bayer presents gZhan-dga' as a 
> participant in the Ris-med tradition, and more specifically as a 
> nonsectarian author, teacher, and founder (or "founding principal," 
> as Bayer has it). gZhan-dga's efforts helped to preserve "the Ris-med 
> legacy" and "had an enormous impact on Tibetan intellectual life" 
> (pp. 6, 8). He brought about "a fundamental reform in Tibetan 
> Buddhist education" within the rNying-ma, Sa-skya, and bKa'-brgyud 
> schools (p. 178). Still, Bayer argues, he did not necessarily set out 
> to do so. His activity as a prolific founder of scriptural 
> colleges--"explanation colleges" and "exposition seminaries" in the 
> book's literal rendering--arose largely from being in the right place 
> at the right time, combined with an obvious reputation for erudition 
> and willingness to accept invitations. This willingness waned in his 
> later years, however, as it conflicted with his ambition to remain in 
> retreat. Yet even when he retired to the mountains, he still 
> continued to teach and involve himself in the politics of _sprul-sku_ 
> succession. 
> 
> Bayer does not broach the topic of whether gZhan-dga' should be 
> classified as the author or editor of the gloss commentaries on the 
> thirteen major texts, a legitimate question given that they are 
> cribbed from the works of Indian authors. But he does make clear that 
> the texts served a practical purpose: for students seated 
> cross-legged on the floor without a desk, simultaneously consulting 
> two or more loose-leaf books--a "root text" and its commentary or 
> commentaries--poses something of an ergonomic challenge, to which a 
> single combined volume offers an elegant solution. Bayer also 
> provides a mass of bibliographic information for each of the works 
> and discusses the circumstances surrounding their composition (if 
> that is the word). He lists their various pre- and post-1959 editions 
> and identifies a likely precedent in the "eighteen [treatises] of 
> great renown" (_grags chen bco brgyad_) particular to the Sa-skya 
> tradition (pp. 188-90). As Smith observed in his seminal essay on 
> Kong-sprul and the nonsectarian movement, the gloss commentaries 
> represented a "reorientation" toward Indian originals that predated 
> many of Tibet's philosophical controversies and sectarian 
> wrangling.[1] Bayer underscores this point and makes the further 
> observation that the commentaries' nondenominationalism facilitated 
> their adoption by colleges of different sectarian affiliations, as 
> they could be taught at a foundational level prior to the defining 
> tenets of a given tradition. 
> 
> The choice of thirteen treatises, selection of commentaries, and 
> choice of passages within them all reflect gZhan-dga's pedagogical 
> approach but do little to reveal his philosophical standpoint. Even 
> his minor writings, in which he had more freedom to express his 
> views, leave some room for speculation as to what he actually 
> believed. It is clear that he had a fondness for Candrakīrti's 
> approach and was an admirer of both Sa-skya Paṇḍita Kun-dga' 
> rgyal-mtshan (1128-1251) and Go-rams-pa bSod-nams seng-ge (1429-89), 
> yet questions remain. Why are there no _pramāṇa_  titles among the 
> thirteen great texts, for example? Bayer addresses two key issues in 
> particular detail: gZhan-dga's supposed critique of the 
> emptiness-of-other view and his attitude toward _pramāṇa_ and 
> debate. Historians of Tibetan scholasticism will appreciate the 
> thoroughness with which Bayer treats these topics. It is a pity 
> though that he fails to identify 'Jigs-med gling-pa's _Yon tan mdzod_ 
> as the source for a key citation in _The Mirror Illuminating the 
> Objects of Knowledge _(_Shes bya gsal ba'i me long_), gZhan-dga's 
> longest minor work. The reference to 'Jigs-med gling-pa here as the 
> "later Omniscient One" (_kun mkhyen phyi ma_) shows the extent to 
> which gZhan-dga' was embedded within the Klong-chen snying-thig 
> tradition, a point Bayer himself makes elsewhere in the book. 
> 
> Such quibbles aside, Bayer's book represents a significant 
> contribution to the history of Tibetan Buddhism in the twentieth 
> century and an essential work of reference for anyone with more than 
> a passing interest in traditional Tibetan education, scholasticism, 
> or nonsectarianism. It sheds light not only on gZhan-dga's life but 
> also on the lives of those around him, including Dil-mgo mKhyen-brtse 
> bkra-shis dpal-'byor (1910-91), whom gZhan-dga' believed to be the 
> incarnation of his main teacher O-rgyan bstan-'dzin nor-bu 
> (1841-1900?), and it paints a vivid picture of intellectual life in 
> and around the monasteries of Khams in the early twentieth century. 
> In this respect, it complements David Jackson's _Saint in Seattle: 
> The Life of the Tibetan Mystic Dezhung Rinpoche_  (2003), on the life 
> of sDe-gzhung Rin-po-che (1906-87), which was both a reference for, 
> and beneficiary of, Bayer's research. Additional sources, as they 
> become available, may clarify some episodes in gZhan-dga's career 
> that still remain contested or obscure.[2] Even so, all future 
> research on gZhan-dga's life and works and on monastic education more 
> generally will surely benefit from the foundations laid in this 
> monograph, an admirable work of scholarship that befits its 
> illustrious (and somewhat enigmatic) subject. 
> 
> Notes 
> 
> [1]. See E. Gene Smith, _Among Tibetan Texts: History and Literature 
> of the Himalayan Plateau_ (Boston, MA: Wisdom Publications, 2001), 
> 246. 
> 
> [2]. One such source, perhaps, is the biography of O-rgyan 
> bstan-'dzin nor-bu, to which Matthieu Ricard has access but that has 
> not yet been made available to researchers. A recently published 
> biography of dBon-stod mkhyen-rab Chos-kyi-'od-zer (1889-1959), 
> gZhan-dga's successor at Khams-bye college at rDzong-gsar, also 
> warrants attention. See Nyi ma blo gsal (rab brtan pa dge legs phun 
> tshogs), "dbon stod pa mkhan chen mkhyen rab kyi nyi ma'i rnam thar," 
> in _dbon stod mkhyen rab chos kyi 'od zer gyi gsung 'bum_ (Lhasa: Bod 
> ljongs bod yig dpe rnying dpe skrun khang, 2015), 1-47. 
> 
> Citation: Adam Pearcey. Review of Bayer, Achim, _The Life and Works 
> of mKhan-po gZhan-dga' (1871-1927): rDzogs-chen Master and 
> Educational Reformer of Eastern Tibet_. H-Buddhism, H-Net Reviews. 
> June, 2021.
> URL: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=56511
> 
> This work is licensed under a Creative Commons 
> Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States 
> License.
> 
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#8949): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/8949
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/83280887/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES &amp; NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly &amp; permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to