Cde Dennis Brasky wrote: <<The Egyptian government has expressed rhetorical 
support for Palestinians but is complicit in Israel’s genocide in Gaza>> 
https://truthout.org/articles/egypt-has-betrayed-palestinians-in-their-time-of-greatest-need/
 From which:  "Egypt’s relation to Gaza is not straightforward. Egypt has 
displayed rhetorical solidarity with Palestinians but it has simultaneously 
acted in complicity with the U.S., Israel, and other Arab autocrats in their 
campaigns against Palestinians."
........................................................................................................................................................................................................
'Terrorism' 1 ( #sdfootnote1sym ) as a strategy for liberation "The initial 
Arab public response to Hamas’s acts of terror set a secular and moderate tone. 
Hamas’s October 7 actions conflated the boundaries between legitimate 
resistance to the Israeli occupation and siege of the Palestinian territories, 
which categorically does not include targeting civilians, and crimes of 
terrorism. In response, Arab governments ( 
https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/138158 ) , civil society organizations ( 
https://twitter.com/alhaq_org/status/1711308161351631073 ) , several media 
outlets ( 
https://english.alarabiya.net/views/2023/10/13/Two-wrongs-don-t-make-a-right-Israel-must-spare-Palestinian-civilians
 ) , and some influential social media accounts ( 
https://www.memri.org/reports/social-media-arab-intellectuals-condemn-hamas-widescale-attack-israel-saying-it-serves-irans
 ) were quick to condemn the violence and call for the protection of life on 
both sides." Amr Hamzawy. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 
11-1-2023. 
https://carnegieendowment.org/2023/11/01/pay-attention-to-arab-public-response-to-israel-hamas-war-pub-90893
 ( 
https://carnegieendowment.org/2023/11/01/pay-attention-to-arab-public-response-to-israel-hamas-war-pub-90893
 ) (Links in the original.) When Israelis murder 30, 000 civilians it’s 
‘collateral damage’. When Hamas launches an attack that kills @1000 Israelis 
it's 'terrorism'. I worked in the garment industry @ the turn of this century. 
The company's salesman was an outspoken Zionist. He brought in a two-paneled 
cartoon. On the left was an armed IDF soldier crouched in front of a baby in a 
stroller, protecting it; on the other side was a similar stroller with a child 
in it. Crouched hiding behind it was a stereotypical caricature of an Arab with 
an AK-47. He said, "Now, what do you think of that." Not a question. I replied, 
"Where are the tanks." Also not a question. Away from the current conflict 
between the people living in Gaza and the murderous invaders of the IDF; away 
from choosing and defending the ‘talking points’ of this or that side; away 
even from an examination of the historical usage of 'terrorism' (e.g. the use 
of counter-'terror' by the Mau Mau (see below) in response to British terror; 
and the use of counter-'terror' by the Algerian freedom fighters of the FLN ( 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algerian_War#Algerian_use_of_terror ) in response 
to the terror campaigns waged by the OAS ( 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organisation_arm%C3%A9e_secr%C3%A8te ) ). Away 
from the 'terror'' aided victories of the Viet Minh ( 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viet_Cong_and_People's_Army_of_Vietnam_use_of_terror_in_the_Vietnam_War
 ) (against the terrors inflicted by the Japanese ( 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_war_crimes ) and the French ( 
https://sites.tufts.edu/atrocityendings/2015/08/07/indochina-1st-indochina-war/ 
) as well as that of the Diem regime ( 
https://www.nytimes.com/1972/12/01/archives/an-earlier-bloodbath.html ) and of 
the US ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Lai_massacre ) ). And way from that 
of the mujahidin, at first against the Soviets and then against the Americans ( 
https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/who-responsible-taliban ) ) 
where the invaders were slunk out, sent home from Afghanistan, with their tails 
between their legs, The kamikaze of Taliban suicide bombers helped to drive the 
US out of Afghanistan. ( https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN18198862/ ) Away 
away from all such, the question of 'terror's usage as a strategy for 
liberation is a phenomenon in and of itself and could be examined out of and 
away from the context of this or that particularity. Here it is to be asserted 
that something of a global political principle can be extracted from the 
particulars of an individual non-political social case. Such a proposal can be 
quickly summed as “When there is no path of resistance save 'terrorism' then 
such is justified." The murdered Panther, Bunchy Carter, said "Do something. Do 
something if you just spit ( 
https://www.facebook.com/wedroptruthbombs/photos/a.1994280894118743/2777739465772878/?type=3
 )." 'Terrorism' is the oppressed's big Hawk-too-ee. "(Bethwell) Ogot dismissed 
(Caroline) Elkins as an uncritical imbiber of Mau Mau propaganda...he argued, 
she had glossed over the litany of Mau Mau atrocities: '...decapitation and 
general mutilation of civilians, torture before murder, bodies bound up in 
sacks and dropped in wells, burning the victims alive, gouging out of eyes, 
splitting open the stomachs of pregnant women.'" “Uncovering the brutal truth 
about the British empire.” Marc Parry. The Guardian. Being a "Long Read" 
overview of "Britain's Gulag: The Brutal End of Empire in Kenya" by Caroline 
Elkins ( 
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=%22Britain's+Gulag%3A+The+Brutal+End+of+Empire+in+Kenya%22+by+Caroline+Elkins
 ) 
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/aug/18/uncovering-truth-british-empire-caroline-elkins-mau-mau
 ( 
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/aug/18/uncovering-truth-british-empire-caroline-elkins-mau-mau
 ) ) How could such things possibly be defended? Wars cannot be won by such 
acts of 'terrorism'. The oppressor's vastly superior military cannot be 
defeated that way, but his will to continue to inflict real terror upon the 
oppressed can be sapped by the latter's ability to impose its own 'terror'. 
'Terror' wreaked upon that former that comes to amount to " unacceptable damage 
( https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/05679327408448334 ) ". The 
following is a most certainly banal example but the situation just above is 
like a 6ft 3in bully who fcks with you everyday. When you stomp down on his 
toe, or knee him in his balls, he cries "Foul". He may continue right then and 
there to kick your ass but he'll think twice about fckn with you the next day. 
Unacceptable damage. Something very similar happened to me in Mobile when I was 
in the 9th grade. By that time my 4 brothers and 2 sisters were in LA. The 
familial force that had protected me left with them. There was a junior, Bobby 
Joe Jenkins, who would fck with me every day with that "Freshman” bullsht. I 
bought a knife with the money I made from the Fri night bingo games taking 
tickets. When he came up to me, I pulled it out opening it as I did so. A girl 
cousin, who was a senior, walked past me and in a hushed whisper hissed, "Put 
the knife away" and went on. When I saw her coming I thought she was gonna tell 
the asshole to leave me alone. But she, part of our 'better' (wealthier) 
relatives, was more concerned about someone seeing the knife thus embarrassing 
her. I never forgave her for that though she really had no choice. She was 
raised by parents every bit the same. You've seen them. You know them. Folks 
who pray louder above all congregants yet leave out of church bypassing an 
unfortunate's outstretched hand while either casting an aspersive glance or, 
worse, not seeing him at all. Her reaction and her parentage are very much akin 
to the Arab recriminations of the 7th of Hamas. They had no choice but to 
follow in lock step behind the head roosters in their middle-eastern hen 
house--their Saudi 'big brother', and his shadowy Uncle--when this was exactly 
the time to call the Zionists out on the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank (to 
a large extent waged by settlers (armed Israeli civilians)); to demand back the 
long-term seizure of the Golan; to cease the all-but daily military incursions 
into Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Iran; and, above all, to immediately begin to 
recompense the destruction, the horrors, of the open air prison camp that is 
the Gaza.  As an aside, Why is no one calling for the Israeli's to 100% 
recompense the horrors of the devastations wreaked?  Not just the physical 
plant destroyed but the lives wrecked.
In all probability, Bobby Joe might have been slashed and then proceeded to 
beat the 35lbs of weight difference out of me. But he would have been marked 
for the rest of his life and every time he caught glimpse of that scar he'da 
been reminded of me. He never bothered me again. Such is the power of the 
powerless, the ability to mete out a response capable of dispensing, measure 
for measure, unacceptable damage. 2 ( #sdfootnote2sym ) With total subjugation, 
the power of the oppressor over the oppressed is absolute. And it is its very 
unlimited nature that is its limit. The freedom-fighters motto could be "We 
know what you can do to us but you have no idea what we will be able to do to 
you" for the oppressed can learn and learn quickly the ways of the conqueror's 
terror; for his 'terror' is the instillation of the same fear into the 
own-shadow of the overlord such that he can't tell whether the shade following 
him is that of his own or that of the last thing his eyes won't ever see. 
"...lost in all the focus on terrorism, is that the episodic terrorism employed 
by the slave is used in rebellion against the constant terrorism enforced by 
the slaveholders’ violence. It is the element of rebellion against oppression 
that is the vital factor." 3 ( #sdfootnote3sym ) The psychopath wreaks havoc 
and commits terror for its own sake. His actions and his motivation are the 
same. The occupier wreaks havoc and commits terror for the sake of establishing 
and maintaining dominance over the other for his own benefit. The freedom 
fighter, when necessitated, commits 'terror' for the sake of a goal, liberation 
from domination. Faced with an asymmetry of martial abilities, he has no 
option, no other choice. With no apologies to Thatcher...TINA.
1 Here, terror and terrorism are counterposed to 'terror' and 'terrorism' (with 
quotes). The former are acts of a colonial power seeking to maintain domination 
of the subjugated's political arena and economies. The latters, are acts of war 
aimed at the dissolution of the colonial rule.

2 ( #sdfootnote2anc ) (James) Clerk Maxwell, when he entered the Academy, was 
somewhat rustic and somewhat eccentric. Boys called him ‘Dafty,’ and used to 
try to make fun of him. On one occasion I remember he turned with tremendous 
vigour, with a kind of demonic force, on his tormentors. I think he was let 
alone after that, and gradually won the respect even of the most thoughtless of 
his schoolfellows." https://www.famousscientists.org/james-clerk-maxwell/ ( 
https://www.famousscientists.org/james-clerk-maxwell/ )

3 ( #sdfootnote3anc ) Private email from a comrade, 2-1-24.

JAI


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#29768): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/29768
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/105255831/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to