Sermon for Gaza

| 
| 
| 
|  |  |

 |

 |
| 
|  | 
Sermon for Gaza

Chris Hedges

This is a sermon I gave Sunday April 28 at a service held at the encampment for 
Gaza at Princeton University. Th...
 |

 |

 |




Sermon for Gaza
This is a sermon I gave Sunday April 28 at a service held at the encampment for 
Gaza at Princeton University. The service was organized by students from 
Princeton Theological Seminary.
In the conflicts I covered as a reporter in Latin America, Africa, the Middle 
East and the Balkans, I encountered singular individuals of varying creeds, 
religions, races and nationalities who majestically rose up to defy the 
oppressor on behalf of the oppressed. Some of them are dead. Some of them are 
forgotten. Most of them are unknown.
These individuals, despite their vast cultural differences, had common traits—a 
profound commitment to the truth, incorruptibility, courage, a distrust of 
power, a hatred of violence and a deep empathy that was extended to people who 
were different from them, even to people defined by the dominant culture as the 
enemy. They are the most remarkable men and women I met in my 20 years as a 
foreign correspondent. I set my life by the standards they set.
You have heard of some, such as Vaclav Havel, whom I and other foreign 
reporters met most evenings, during the 1989 Velvet Revolution in 
Czechoslovakia, in the Magic Lantern Theatre in Prague. Others, no less great, 
you probably do not know, such as the Jesuit priest Iganacio Ellacuria, who was 
gunned down by the death squads in El Salvador in 1989. And then there are 
those “ordinary” people, although, as the writer V.S. Pritchett said, no people 
are ordinary, who risked their lives in wartime to shelter and protect those of 
an opposing religion or ethnicity being persecuted and hunted. And to some of 
these “ordinary” people I owe my own life.
To resist radical evil, as you are doing, is to endure a life that by the 
standards of the wider society is a failure. It is to defy injustice at the 
cost of your career, your reputation, your financial solvency and at times your 
life. It is to be a lifelong heretic. And, perhaps this is the most important 
point, it is to accept that the dominant culture, even the liberal elites, will 
push you to the margins and attempt to discredit not only what you do, but your 
character. When I returned to the newsroom at The New York Times after being 
booed off a commencement stage in 2003 for denouncing the invasion of Iraq and 
being publicly reprimanded by the paper for my stance against the war, 
reporters and editors I had known and worked with for 15 years lowered their 
heads or turned away when I was nearby. They did not want to be contaminated by 
the same career-killing contagion.
Ruling institutions -- the state, the press, the church, the courts, 
universities  -- mouth the language of morality, but they serve the structures 
of power, no matter how venal, which provide them with money, status and 
authority. All of these institutions, including the academy, are complicit 
through their silence or their active collaboration with radical evil. This was 
true during the genocide we committed against native Americans, slavery, the 
witch hunts during the McCarthy era, the civil rights and anti-war movements 
and the fight against the apartheid regime of South Africa. The most courageous 
are purged and turned into pariahs.
All institutions, including the church, the theologian Paul Tillich once wrote, 
are inherently demonic. And a life dedicated to resistance has to accept that a 
relationship with any institution is often temporary, because sooner or later 
that institution is going to demand acts of silence or obedience your 
conscience will not allow you to make.
The theologian James Cone in his book “The Cross and the Lynching Tree” writes 
that for oppressed blacks the cross was a “paradoxical religious symbol because 
it inverts the world’s value system with the news that hope comes by way of 
defeat, that suffering and death do not have the last word, that the last shall 
be first and the first last.”
Cone continues: “That God could ‘make a way out of no way’ in Jesus’ cross was 
truly absurd to the intellect, yet profoundly real in the souls of black folk. 
Enslaved blacks who first heard the gospel message seized on the power of the 
cross. Christ crucified manifested God’s loving and liberating presence in the 
contradictions of black life—that transcendent presence in the lives of black 
Christians that empowered them to believe that ultimately, in God’s 
eschatological future, they would not be defeated by the ‘troubles of this 
world,’ no matter how great and painful their suffering. Believing this 
paradox, this absurd claim of faith, was only possible in humility and 
repentance. There was no place for the proud and the mighty, for people who 
think that God called them to rule over others. The cross was God’s critique of 
power—white power—with powerless love, snatching victory out of defeat.”
Reinhold Niebuhr labeled this capacity to defy the forces of repression “a 
sublime madness in the soul.” Niebuhr wrote that “nothing but madness will do 
battle with malignant power and ‘spiritual wickedness in high places.’ ” This 
sublime madness, as Niebuhr understood, is dangerous, but it is vital. Without 
it, “truth is obscured.” And Niebuhr also knew that traditional liberalism was 
a useless force in moments of extremity. Liberalism, Niebuhr said, “lacks the 
spirit of enthusiasm, not to say fanaticism, which is so necessary to move the 
world out of its beaten tracks. It is too intellectual and too little emotional 
to be an efficient force in history.”
The prophets in the Hebrew Bible had this sublime madness. The words of the 
Hebrew prophets, as Rabbi Abraham Heschel wrote, were “a scream in the night. 
While the world is at ease and asleep, the prophet feels the blast from 
heaven.” The prophet, because he or she saw and faced an unpleasant reality, 
was, as Heschel wrote, “compelled to proclaim the very opposite of what their 
heart expected.”
This sublime madness is the essential quality for a life of resistance. It is 
the acceptance that when you stand with the oppressed you will be treated like 
the oppressed. It is the acceptance that, although empirically all that we 
struggled to achieve during our lifetime may be worse, our struggle validates 
itself.
The radical Catholic priest Daniel Berrigan --  who was sentenced to three 
years in a federal prison for burning draft records during the war in Vietnam 
-- told me that faith is the belief that the good draws to it the good. The 
Buddhists call this karma. But he said for us as Christians we did not know 
where it went. We trusted that it went somewhere. But we did not know where. We 
are called to do the good, or at least the good so far as we can determinate 
it, and then let it go.
As Hannah Arendt wrote, the only morally reliable people are not those who say 
“this is wrong” or “this should not be done,” but those who say “I can’t.” They 
know that as Immanuel Kant wrote: “If justice perishes, human life on earth has 
lost its meaning.” And this means that, like Socrates, we must come to a place 
where it is better to suffer wrong than to do wrong. We must at once see and 
act, and given what it means to see, this will require the surmounting of 
despair, not by reason, but by faith.
I saw in the conflicts I covered the power of this faith, which lies outside 
any religious or philosophical creed. This faith is what Havel called in his 
essay “The Power of the Powerless” living in truth. Living in truth exposes the 
corruption, lies and deceit of the state. It is a refusal to be a part of the 
charade.
James Baldwin, the son of a preacher and briefly a preacher himself, said he 
abandoned the pulpit to preach the Gospel. The Gospel, he knew, was not heard 
most Sundays in Christian houses of worship.
This is not to say that the church does not exist. This is not to say that I 
reject the church. On the contrary. The church today is not located in the 
cavernous, and largely empty houses of worship, but here, with you, with those 
who demand justice, those whose unofficial credo is the Beatitudes:
Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed 
are they who mourn, for they shall be comforted. Blessed are the meek, for they 
shall possess the earth. Blessed are they who hunger and thirst for justice, 
for they shall be satisfied. Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain 
mercy. Blessed are the pure of heart, for they shall see God. Blessed are the 
peacemakers, for they shall be called sons and daughters of God. Blessed are 
they who suffer persecution for justice sake, for theirs is the kingdom of 
heaven.
Jesus, if he lived in contemporary society, would be undocumented. He was not a 
Roman citizen. He lived without rights, under Roman occupation. Jesus was a 
person of color. The Romans were white. And the Romans, who peddled their own 
version of white supremacy, nailed people of color to crosses almost as often 
as we finish them off with lethal injections, gun them down in the streets, 
lock them up in cages or slaughter them in Gaza. The Romans killed Jesus as an 
insurrectionist, a revolutionary. They feared the radicalism of the Christian 
Gospel. And they were right to fear it. The Roman state saw Jesus the way the 
American state saw Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. Then, like now, 
prophets were killed.
The Bible unequivocally condemns the powerful. It is not a self-help manual to 
become rich. It does not bless America or any other nation. It was written for 
the powerless, for those James Cone calls the crucified of the earth. It was 
written to give a voice to, and affirm the dignity of, those being crushed by 
malignant power and empire.
There is nothing easy about faith. It demands we smash the idols that enslave 
us. It demands we die to the world. It demands self-sacrifice. It demands 
resistance. It calls us to see ourselves in the wretched of the earth. It 
separates us from all that is familiar. It knows that once we feel the 
suffering of others, we will act.
“But what of the price of peace?” Berrigan asks in his book “No Bars to 
Manhood.”
“I think of the good, decent, peace-loving people I have known by the 
thousands, and I wonder. How many of them are so afflicted with the wasting 
disease of normalcy that, even as they declare for the peace, their hands reach 
out with an instinctive spasm … in the direction of their comforts, their home, 
their security, their income, their future, their plans—that five-year plan of 
studies, that ten-year plan of professional status, that twenty-year plan of 
family growth and unity, that fifty-year plan of decent life and honorable 
natural demise. “Of course, let us have the peace,” we cry, “but at the same 
time let us have normalcy, let us lose nothing, let our lives stand intact, let 
us know neither prison nor ill repute nor disruption of ties.” And because we 
must encompass this and protect that, and because at all costs—at all costs—our 
hopes must march on schedule, and because it is unheard of that in the name of 
peace a sword should fall, disjoining that fine and cunning web that our lives 
have woven, because it is unheard of that good men should suffer injustice or 
families be sundered or good repute be lost—because of this we cry peace and 
cry peace, and there is no peace. There is no peace because there are no 
peacemakers. There are no makers of peace because the making of peace is at 
least as costly as the making of war—at least as exigent, at least as 
disruptive, at least as liable to bring disgrace and prison and death in its 
wake.”
Bearing the cross is not about the pursuit of happiness. It does not embrace 
the illusion of inevitable human progress. It is not about achieving status, 
wealth, celebrity or power. It entails sacrifice. It is about our neighbor. The 
organs of state security monitor and harass you. They amass huge files on your 
activities. They disrupt your life.
Why am I here today with you? I am here because I have tried, however 
imperfectly, to live by the radical message of the Gospel. I am here because I 
know that it is not what we say or profess but what we do. I am here because I 
have seen that it is possible to be a Jew, a Buddhist, a Muslim, a Christian, a 
Hindu or an atheist and carry the cross. The words are different but the 
self-sacrifice and thirst for justice are the same.
These men and women, who may not profess what I profess or believe what I 
believe, are my brothers and sisters. And I stand with them honoring and 
respecting our differences and finding hope and strength and love in our common 
commitment. At times like these I hear the voices of the saints who went before 
us. The suffragist Susan B. Anthony, who announced that resistance to tyranny 
is obedience to God, and the suffragist Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who said, “The 
moment we begin to fear the opinions of others and hesitate to tell the truth 
that is in us, and from motives of policy are silent when we should speak, the 
divine floods of light and life no longer flow into our souls.” Or Henry David 
Thoreau, who told us we should be men and women first and subjects afterward, 
that we should cultivate a respect not for the law but for what is right. And 
Frederick Douglass, who warned us: “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It 
never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit 
to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will 
be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with 
either words or blows, or both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the 
endurance of those whom they oppress.” And the great 19th century populist Mary 
Elizabeth Lease, who thundered: “Wall Street owns the country. It is no longer 
a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, but a government 
of Wall Street, by Wall Street, and for Wall Street. The great common people of 
this country are slaves, and monopoly is the master.” And General Smedley 
Bulter, who said that after 33 years and four months in the Marine Corps he had 
come to understand that he had been nothing more than a gangster for 
capitalism, making Mexico safe for American oil interests, making Haiti and 
Cuba safe for banks and pacifying the Dominican Republic for sugar companies. 
War, he said, is a racket in which subjugated countries are exploited by the 
financial elites and Wall Street while the citizens foot the bill and sacrifice 
their young men and women on the battlefield for corporate greed. Or Eugene V. 
Debs, the socialist presidential candidate, who in 1912 pulled almost a million 
votes, or 6 percent, and who was sent to prison by Woodrow Wilson for opposing 
the First World War, and who told the world: “While there is a lower class, I 
am in it, and while there is a criminal element I am of it, and while there is 
a soul in prison, I am not free.” And Rabbi Heschel, who when he was criticized 
for marching with Martin Luther King on the Sabbath in Selma answered: “I pray 
with my feet” and who quoted Samuel Johnson, who said: “The opposite of good is 
not evil. The opposite of good is indifference.” And Rosa Parks, who defied the 
segregated bus system and said “the only tired I was, was tired of giving in.” 
And Philip Berrigan, who said: “If enough Christians follow the Gospel, they 
can bring any state to its knees.” And Martin Luther King, who said: “On some 
positions, cowardice asks the question, ‘Is it safe?’ Expediency asks the 
question, ‘Is it politic?’ Vanity asks the question, ‘Is it popular?’ And there 
comes a time when a true follower of Jesus Christ must take a stand that’s 
neither safe nor politic nor popular but he must take a stand because it is 
right.”
Where were you when they crucified my Lord?
Were you there to halt the genocide of Native Americans? Were you there when 
Sitting Bull died on the cross? Were you there to halt the enslavement of 
African-Americans? Were you there to halt the mobs that terrorized black men, 
women and even children with lynching during Jim Crow? Were you there when they 
persecuted union organizers and Joe Hill died on the cross? Were you there to 
halt the incarceration of Japanese-Americans in World War II? Were you there to 
halt Bull Connor’s dogs as they were unleashed on civil rights marchers in 
Birmingham? Were you there when Martin Luther King died upon the cross? Were 
you there when Malcolm X died on the cross? Were you there to halt the hate 
crimes, discrimination and violence against gays, lesbians, bisexuals, queers 
and those who are transgender? Were you there when Matthew Shepard died on the 
cross? Were you there to halt the abuse and at times enslavement of workers in 
the farmlands of this country? Were you there to halt the murder of hundreds of 
thousands of innocent Vietnamese during the war in Vietnam or hundreds of 
thousands of Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan? Were you there to halt the 
genocide in Gaza? Were you there when they crucified Refaat Alareer on the 
cross?
Where were you when they crucified my Lord?
I know where I was.
Here.
With you.
Amen.
Chris Hedges
  


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#30130): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/30130
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/105791735/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to