> On Jun 13, 2024, at 11:01 AM, Ian Angus via groups.io 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> TWO VIEWS (BOTH WRONG) ON MARX, DEGROWTH, AND PRODUCTIVISM 
> https://climateandcapitalism.com/2024/06/13/two-views-both-wrong-on-marx-degrowth-and-productivism/

I agree with the article and have had the benefit of MEP's Ecosocialism classes 
that covered these authors, including Saito's _Marx in the Anthropocene_.  
That's a plug.

There's only one sentence that I would change in the article, which states that 
"On the basis of the recovery of Marx’s deep-seated ecological critique, 
ecosocialism has made major advances over the last quarter-century."  I would 
change that to "our understanding of ecosocialism has made major advances" 
because the movement hasn't made major advances.  Has it?

The conclusion makes the point: This "...constitutes a theoretical foundation 
on which all those committed to the philosophy of praxis today can draw in 
their struggles to create an economically egalitarian and ecologically 
sustainable world."  It's time, I think, that we seriously consider the goals, 
strategy, tactics and demands for the movement as we continue to learn and 
debate the theory.  I think this list should have a role to play in that if we 
are to be relevant in addressing world capitalism's most dire crisis. 

thanks, Mark




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#30766): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/30766
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/106656768/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to