The topic is kind of interesting and the author raises several issues. I don't 
think based on large gap between what Russia says it will do and what it 
actually does that any of this will lead to "WWIII". Hitting another 100km 
Russian military targets will provoke an ICBM response from Russia. The only 
country threatening nuclear war in the last 3 years is Russia. Russia, that is 
Putin, *stated* that any Ukrainian troops who invade the "Russian Motherland" 
would provoke them into using tactical nuclear weapons. Medvedev, Putin's 
poodle, has stated this on multiple occasions... with Ukrainian troops now 
having crossed the border and holding Russian land for 3 months, still, the use 
of tactical nukes has yet to occur. On every occasion when Ukrainians have used 
US weapons, or their own, to hit deeper inside Russia, Putin has declared the 
possible use of weapons against NATO countries. Yet nothing ever happens. I am 
underwhelmed by Russian responses to what they say is an increase by NATO and 
the US attacks on Russia (they mean, as does the author of this short article, 
that the Ukrainians are simply a NATO army thus NATO has to take 
responsibility, etc etc.

David


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#33647): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/33647
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/109643949/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to