Opinion | The Democratic Party Deserves Its Image as a Party of War | Common 
Dreams


While analyzing the tailspin of the Biden presidency and the failed campaign of 
Vice President Kamala Harris, few pundits have questioned that militarism is a 
political necessity as well as a vital tool of U.S. foreign policy.

Harris checked a standard box at the Democratic National Convention when she 
pledged to maintain “the strongest, most lethal fighting force in the world.” 
Yet the erosion of the Democratic Party’s base is partly due to the alienation 
of voters who don’t want to cast their ballot for what they see as a war party.

That perception is especially acute among the young, and notable among African 
Americans. Many have viewed President Joe Biden’s resolute support for the 
Israeli war in Gaza as a moral collapse. When Harris remained loyal to it 
during the fall campaign, her credibility sank.

Conditions may soon shift for the Democratic Party to start moving beyond its 
war culture.

Events in recent weeks have done nothing to reassure those repelled by the 
Democratic administration’s approach. Biden’s purported 30-day deadline for 
Israel to start allowing adequate food into Gaza expired shortly after the 
election—without Israeli compliance—while the humanitarian disaster in Gaza 
actually became worse than ever. Biden’s White House pretended otherwise.

The ongoing hellish realities for Palestinian civilians in Gaza caused 40% of 
Senate Democrats to vote for Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-Vt.) post-election 
resolution to block $20 billion worth of military aid to Israel. But near the 
end of November, Biden followed up by greenlighting an additional $680 million 
in arms sales to Israel. While Republicans remained in lockstep for arming 
Israel, the budding dissent from congressional Democrats remained ineffectual.

On Ukraine war policy, dissent has been rare from Democratic lawmakers. Two 
years ago, 30 progressive House Democrats sent a letter to Biden that suggested 
“a proactive diplomatic push” could be useful for achieving a cease-fire—but 
they quickly withdrew the letter after an angry backlash from hawkish leaders 
in their own party. (Republican lawmakers are split on Ukraine policy—many want 
the U.S. to recklessly confront China instead of Russia.)

Few Democrats have mustered more than feeble caveats about open-ended military 
aid to the Kyiv government, merely watching as the Biden administration 
repeatedly crosses its own red lines on such matters as approval of 
longer-range Ukrainian missile strikes into Russia. For the Ukraine war, in the 
lexicon of high-ranking Democrats, “diplomacy” has been a dirty word.

Overall, the president has accelerated the war train (sometimes hailing more 
war production as good for the U.S. economy), with party leaders providing fuel 
and Democratic constituents confined to the caboose. The opinions of the party 
faithful count for little.

Polling has made clear that an overwhelming majority of Democrats want a U.S. 
arms embargo against Israel. On Ukraine, a poll early this year found that 
while less than one-fifth of Democrats wanted to end all military aid to 
Ukraine, upwards of half wanted to make it conditional on diplomatic talks, a 
stance firmly rejected by the administration.

Fond of telling the world about the imperative of a “rules-based order” to stop 
cross-border aggression, Biden and his secretary of State, Antony Blinken, 
rationalize breaking the rules at will. This year, in the Middle East, the U.S. 
launched bombing attacks on Yemen, Syria, and Iraq. Objections from leaders of 
the president’s party have not been audible.

The Democratic Party deserves its image as a party of war. To explore 
possibilities for how that might change will require a candid assessment of how 
that image came into focus in the 21st century.

Soon after Barack Obama became president in 2009, he made the “war on terror” 
explicitly bipartisan. With the Democratic Party in tow, he tripled the number 
of U.S. troops in Afghanistan, peaking at 100,000 in 2010—swiftly escalating a 
war inflicting widespread carnage in rural areas out of media sight.

In Iraq, the war effort persisted as the number of U.S. boots on the ground 
slowly declined. Meanwhile, Obama stepped up drone attacks in Yemen, Pakistan, 
and Somalia. And with disastrous consequences for Libya, Obama had the United 
States lead NATO’s seven-month bombing onslaught of that country in 2011, 
incubating terrorism that expanded far beyond its borders.

Today, the most powerful Democrats are well attuned to the dominant media 
messaging and the agendas of megadonors, establishment “think tanks,” Pentagon 
contractors, and their lobbyists swarming Capitol Hill. With the military 
budget approaching $1 trillion, along with multibillion-dollar weapons 
shipments to allied nations, corporations of varied sizes make huge profits 
from war. And revolving doors between arms sellers and government arms buyers 
never stop spinning.

Conditions may soon shift for the Democratic Party to start moving beyond its 
war culture. But that will require a willingness to challenge the assumptions 
of elected Democrats who are in sync with what Martin Luther King Jr. called 
“the madness of militarism.”
Norman Solomon


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#34225): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/34225
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/110265518/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to