[Edited Message Follows]

I thought it was common knowledge that left-wing electoral and class struggle 
politics were not in contradiction to each other but tended to follow the same 
trajectory.

In the period under discussion, the Socialist Party was comprised of right 
social democrats like Hilquist and Berger - the "sewer socialists - as well as 
radical socialists like Debs.  It reached its peak at the same time as Big Bill 
Haywood's revolutionary syndicalist IWW from the turn of the 20th century 
through WW I.  It was a period of rapid  economic expansion when labour was in 
short supply and the rising trade union movement was able to exercise its power 
in the workplace and politics. The later period of New Deal recovery from the 
Depression through WWII was one of similar economic expansion when labour was 
in demand and reformist and radical trade union and political leaders saw their 
influence increase.

I can't agree with Blanc, however, that the "sewer socialists" (of each 
generation) did not "get closer to overthrowing capitalism due to circumstances 
outside of their control." They never wanted to overthrow capitalism and the 
circumstances, in fact, worked in their favour.  Besides  the growth of 
"conservative public opinion" fostered by social mobility and improved living 
conditions, t he state-sponsored first and second Red Scares following each 
period were equally decisive. The anticapitalists were purged from the unions 
and political life, and the reformist wing of the movement which favoured class 
collaboration rather than conflict was left unchallenged.

Today's much diminished revolutionary and reformist left face a much different 
set of circumstances.  Living standards and social mobility have declined and 
the mass conservative consensus which underwrote the system's legitimacy and 
stability has been breaking down. But labour is no longer in short supply and 
the industrial unions concentrated at the point of production which were once 
the backbone of both wings of the socialist movement have declined apace with 
economic conditions.  It's still unclear what new forms of struggle and 
organization may emerge to revive that once powerful international  movement. 
It goes without saying that any stirrings  which point in that direction should 
be encouraged and actively supported.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#39470): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/39470
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/116460247/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to