Mark your closing statement is not valid and makes no sense: "From the economic growth standpoint, nuclear power is just as bad as fossil fuels. There can be no "Socialist Case for Nuclear Power" until the "Capitalist Case for Nuclear Power" no longer exists." What does that even mean? That fossil fuels, which powered the huge expansion of the productive forces for the last 150 years is not "economic"?? You don't define what that means, either under capitalism or not-in-our-life-time socialism.
David -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#39665): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/39665 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/116655555/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
