The logic of ‘Capital’, the Systematic Dialectic School and a defence of the logical-historical method By William Jefferies In the past three decades, the Systematic Dialectic School has challenged the traditional logical-historical description of Karl Marx’s method. Inspired by the Standard Critique (SC)1 of Marx’s Transformation Procedure (TP), they insist Marx’s Capital can best be understood as mirroring Hegel’s Logic, in both its form and content. Andy Blunden is a Marxist philosopher perhaps best known for his work curating Marxists.org. This article takes Blunden’s books, The ‘Capital’/‘Logic’ Debate and Marx's Capital – Hegelian Sources, as a jumping off point for a re-examination of the relationship of Hegel’s Logic to Marx’s Capital in general, and of the Systematic Dialect school in particular. The background of the TP debate haunts Blunden’s books but is not directly addressed by them; they are included here, nonetheless, as they are directly relevant to the claimed Hegelian and Marxist foundations of the Systematic Dialectic School. https://links.org.au/logic-capital-systematic-dialectic-school-and-defence-logical-historical-method
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#39709): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/39709 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/116773193/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
