>From India to Gaza: Youth Revolts and the Struggle to Break Open the Future - 
>CounterPunch.org
“What if all the cockroaches come together?”
– Abhijeet Dipke


Marx and Engels issued the historic call: “Workers of the world, unite! You 
have nothing to lose but your chains!” Today, that summons returns with renewed 
urgency and takes a new form: Young people of the world unite and resist. Youth 
today possess the courage, imagination, anger, and numbers to change the course 
of history. They have grown up in societies paralyzed by cynicism, loneliness, 
desperation, and hatred, conditions that isolate people from one another and 
teach them to regard cruelty as inevitable. Yet even amid this desolation, a 
radical possibility remains: the recovery of solidarity as a passion for 
justice and love as a public and collective force. This militant love begins 
with the recognition that our lives are profoundly interconnected, that freedom 
cannot be reduced to individual escape, and that none of us can be secure while 
others are rendered vulnerable and disposable. It creates bonds strong enough 
to break through isolation, connect private suffering to public responsibility, 
and transform compassion into organized resistance. As James Baldwin and 
Malcolm X understood in different ways, learning to live requires learning to 
love, not as sentimentality or a retreat into private life, but as a refusal of 
hatred, racism, and the machinery of disposability.

Militant love takes the side of justice. It finds expression in solidarity, 
shared struggle, and the willingness to assume responsibility for lives beyond 
our immediate experience. It transforms loneliness into connection, despair 
into collective courage, and anger into a disciplined struggle for a world in 
which no human being is considered expendable. With catastrophe no longer on 
the horizon but at their doorstep, young people must build a worldwide movement 
of resistance that neither propaganda nor repression can silence. It is time to 
bring to a halt the machinery of death sustained by governments and their 
military-industrial-academic institutions, all stained by the suffering of 
children, women, the elderly, and those condemned as disposable.

But solidarity becomes a radical force only when moral conviction takes the 
form of organized struggle. Student-led protests in India have demonstrated how 
culture can become both a pedagogical weapon and a vehicle of collective 
resistance. After Chief Justice of India Surya Kant contemptuously referred to 
unemployed young people as “cockroaches,” Abhijeet Dipke  answered with a 
provocative challenge on Instagram: “What if all cockroaches come together?” 
The question spread rapidly, transforming an insult meant to humiliate into a 
rallying cry of defiance. Confronting the corrupt and increasingly 
authoritarian Modi government, students, unemployed young people, and their 
supporters used memes, satire, and Instagram reels to expose corruption, 
puncture the mythology of power, and mobilize mass protest. Met with tear gas, 
police violence, and detention, they refused to abandon the streets. Their 
resistance revealed that domination is sustained through more than force. It 
also depends on images, narratives, and a manufactured common sense that 
teaches people what to fear, accept, and obey. By turning culture against 
power, the protesters entered the very terrain where identities are formed, 
anger finds a language, and private suffering becomes public outrage and 
collective action.

The youth-led Cockroach Janta Party converted this defiance into a rapidly 
expanding movement.  With more than 20 million followers on Instagram, it built 
an alternative public sphere beyond the government’s propaganda machine.Young 
people turned digital ridicule into political solidarity and carried it from 
the screen into the streets.  Images of police repression widened public 
outrage, while the movement’s growing power forced the resignation of India’s 
education minister and placed educational reform and public accountability on 
the national agenda. As Arundhati Roy notes, “the student protesters who have 
swarmed Delhi are showing us a different future for India.”

What began as an insult became a symbol. What began as a meme became a 
movement. What began online became a material force capable of making an 
authoritarian government retreat. This was more than a new style of protest. It 
was a restructuring of politics from below, one that seized the cultural 
technologies of domination and turned them against the systems of power that 
produce censorship and dispossession. It showed that culture is not an ornament 
to politics; it is one of the decisive sites where power is challenged, 
solidarity is created, and collective agency is born.

The lesson extends far beyond India. It must not be lost on young people in the 
United States or elsewhere, especially as the genocidal assault on Gaza is 
accompanied by an accelerating campaign of state and settler violence in the 
occupied West Bank. The catastrophe in Palestine is not confined to Gaza. It is 
part of a broader colonial project of dispossession, forced displacement, 
territorial theft, and the destruction of Palestinian life, a logic of 
domination increasingly visible across the globe. It is also a warning of what 
awaits the rest of the world as emerging fascist states answer economic crisis 
with racist paranoia, militarism, and fantasies of purification. This violence 
involves more than the crushing of dissent. A gangster form of neoliberal 
capitalism is merging with colonial violence and authoritarian rule, producing 
a criminogenic order in which law serves power, cruelty becomes policy, and 
entire populations are abandoned to injury, exile, and death.  Azeezah Kanji is 
right to insist:


We speak often of the “Palestine exception”: the extreme repression of 
Palestinian and Palestine solidarity speech and activism. We ought also to 
speak of the Palestine example: understanding Palestine not simply as an 
exception, but as an emblem of the colonial modern condition.


The assault on the village of Tell, southwest of Nablus, gives concrete meaning 
to this “Palestine example”: colonial power operating through the combined 
forces of the military, the state, and armed settlers to dispossess a people 
and destroy the conditions necessary for collective life. Following a deadly 
confrontation involving Palestinians, armed settlers, and Israeli forces, the 
Israeli government imposed collective punishment. Four Palestinians were 
killed, dozens were detained, homes were raided, and military operations spread 
across neighboring communities. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered a 
wider military campaign, while members of his far-right government demanded 
further settlement expansion and the depopulation of Palestinian villages. UN 
Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese described the combined army-settler 
attacks as pogroms against defenseless civilians.

Tell is not an isolated incident. Since October 2023, Israeli forces and 
settlers have killed more than 1,000 Palestinians in the occupied West Bank, 
including roughly 200 children. Thousands have been injured, and more than 
10,000 have been displaced by military operations, demolitions, settler 
attacks, and restrictions on access to their land. Entire Bedouin and rural 
communities have been driven from their homes, while settlement construction 
and the seizure of Palestinian territory have proceeded at an unprecedented 
pace. The violence of armed settler mobs cannot be separated from the 
government that protects, arms, and politically enables them. Nor can it be 
separated from Israel’s widening military assaults across the region, including 
Lebanon. These are not disconnected eruptions of violence but expressions of a 
larger politics of colonial expansion, collective punishment, and permanent war.

What is unfolding across Gaza and the West Bank is a crime against humanity 
made possible by weapons, diplomatic protection, media indifference, and the 
shameful complicity of powerful Western governments, especially the United 
States. Universities invest in and collaborate with the institutions that 
sustain the war machine. Corporate media turn mass suffering into background 
noise. Political leaders empty the language of human rights of all meaning by 
applying it selectively. Under these conditions, silence is not neutrality. It 
is a form of collaboration, and the normalization of genocide becomes a 
rehearsal for further crimes.

The young people of India have shown what becomes possible when a generation 
refuses the future imposed upon it.They are not alone. The resistance emerging 
among young people across the world offers a language for confronting this 
global regime of violence. Although sparked by specific grievances, these 
revolts are rooted in widening inequality, unemployment, economic insecurity, 
corruption, censorship, and the shameless nepotism of political elites.

What is often missed in the mainstream press is that young protesters are 
revolting against a global form of gangster capitalism that has denied them a 
meaningful place in the present and robbed them of a future. Commenting on the 
Cockroach uprising, Vijay Prashad identifies the deeper economic forces driving 
this revolt:


The young protesters are not in revolt because they possess shorter attention 
spans or a special cultural aversion to authority. They are in revolt because 
capitalism cannot integrate them into dignified economic life. They have been 
told to study, acquire degrees, learn new skills, remain competitive, and 
become ‘entrepreneurs.’ Their families have borrowed money, sold land, 
postponed medical treatment, and reduced household consumption to pay for 
education and coaching. At the end of this punishing journey, many discover 
that the promised job does not exist. Others find only temporary contracts, 
unpaid internships, platform work, or jobs whose wages bear no relation to 
their qualifications.


This crisis is not confined to India. In Bangladesh, student protests brought 
an end to Sheikh Hasina’s fifteen-year rule. In Nepal, resistance to corruption 
and digital censorship forced the prime minister’s resignation. In 
Madagascar,protests that began over water and power cuts grew into demands for 
“a complete overhaul of the political system” and drove President Andry 
Rajoelina from the country. In Kenya, a decentralized youth movement compelled 
the government to withdraw a punishing finance bill and continues to challenge 
state power and shape the country’s politics.

Largely leaderless and digitally connected, these movements have transformed 
social media into a counter-public sphere and translated online networks into 
political power in the streets. Different in their histories, demands, and 
results, they share a crucial lesson: when young people refuse silence, 
organize across differences, and connect their courage to a broader public 
outrage, governments can be forced to retreat and seemingly immovable 
structures of power can begin to crack.

 The challenge now is to turn these scattered revolts into a common struggle. 
Young people everywhere must transform these lessons into an international 
movement capable of bringing millions into the streets and interrupting the 
institutions that make mass violence possible. They must organize peaceful 
demonstrations across borders, build student-worker alliances, occupy public 
spaces, radicalize the social imagination, and expose the systems of propaganda 
that sustain it. They must demand an immediate end to the slaughter, an arms 
embargo, international sanctions, and freedom and justice for the Palestinian 
people. Moral outrage must become organized power.

Such a movement must be joined by educators, artists, cultural workers, trade 
unionists, journalists, faith communities, and public intellectuals. Resistance 
cannot remain fragmented by national borders or confined to isolated campuses 
and cities. Demonstrations must become global, coordinated, sustained, and 
impossible for governments to ignore. Boycotts, divestment campaigns, labor 
actions, teach-ins, and mass civil disobedience must converge into a broad 
democratic front capable of imposing a political cost on complicity. The 
capitalist and reactionary nationalist  institutions that sustain oppression 
must be confronted wherever they operate: in government ministries, 
corporations, universities, media systems, financial networks, and the arms 
industry.

The Indian youth movement thus offers a lesson that is both cultural and 
political.  Images, algorithms, digital platforms, and political spectacles are 
expressions of power, but they can also be seized as instruments of resistance. 
Cultural critique must move beyond exposing how consent is manufactured and 
desire is organized.  The cultural realm can be reclaimed from below and 
transformed into a public pedagogy of resistance, collective courage, and 
radical democratic possibility. But digital resistance reaches its limit unless 
it enters the streets, builds durable organizations, joins workers and 
communities, and converts visibility into lasting political power.

The power of young people lies not in youth alone, but in their capacity to 
awaken the rest of society from the paralysis of cynicism, fear, and 
manufactured helplessness. They can expose the lie that nothing can change, 
connect struggles that power works to keep apart, and give global solidarity an 
organized and material form. Yet youthful rebellion cannot be sustained by the 
rush of collective energy and the explosive reach of digital culture alone. As 
Vijay Prashad rightly warns, “spontaneity and digital reach alone cannot 
overcome entrenched power.” If the Cockroach movement is to become a lasting 
political force, it must link examination reform to what Prashad calls “broader 
struggles for employment, public education, labour rights, and economic 
redistribution.” The question, then, is no longer whether young people possess 
the power to ignite change, but whether people across generations will join 
them in building a movement capable of sustaining it.

The burden of resistance does not rest solely with the young. Their movements 
provide a map, not an alibi for the inaction of others. They have revealed the 
language, imagination, courage, and forms of struggle required of everyone who 
refuses a future organized around genocide, colonialism, and permanent war. 
Gaza is being destroyed. The West Bank is being emptied village by village. The 
politics of genocidal violence is spreading across the globe. The time for 
isolated gestures and ceremonial outrage has passed. What is needed now is a 
worldwide uprising of conscience transformed into disciplined, sustained, 
nonviolent mass resistance. Young people of the world must unite with workers, 
educators, artists, and all those who refuse a world ruled by cruelty, 
dispossession, and war. They must organize to shut down the institutions that 
feed the war machine, making complicity impossible and solidarity unavoidable. 
At stake is whether the future will belong to the merchants of death or to 
those with the courage to stop them. Neutrality is no longer an option. 
Resistance is an imperative.

Henry A. Giroux



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#42720): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/42720
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/120555304/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to