Actually may be we should support both. I'll look into the possibility
of doing that.
So what are we to call these annotation?
init is obvious but destroy or destruct?
Thanks,
Keith.
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> No you can still use a declared function .. just give its name. ??
>
> Sanjiva.
>
> Keith Chapman wrote:
>> Actually the first sounds better cause we are pointing to a declared
>> function. In the second case the function cannot be reused. So +1 for
>> the first option.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Keith
>> Ruwan Linton wrote:
>>> +1 for the second approach in implementing this,
>>>
>>> this.init = function () {
>>> //dostuff
>>> };
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ruwan
>>>
>>> Jonathan Marsh wrote:
>>>> And I was expecting a function object rather than a function name:
>>>>
>>>> this.init=init;
>>>> function init() {
>>>> //dostuff
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Or, more commonly we'd probably see:
>>>>
>>>> this.init = function () {
>>>> //dostuff
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> The property-based approach is nice because it doesn't reserve more
>>>> function
>>>> names that a user might want to use himself, and it keeps the
>>>> constructurs/destructors visually distinct from operations.
>>>>
>>>> Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com -
>>>> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> On Behalf Of Keith Chapman
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 7:31 PM
>>>>> To: mashup-dev
>>>>> Subject: [mashup-dev] Service Lifecycle for Mashups
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think its good to introduce some service life cycle stuff to our
>>>>> mashups. It makes our stuff more interesting. So basically it would
>>>>> calla special function at deployment time and another on undeployment.
>>>>>
>>>>> I propose introducing some annotations to take care of this.
>>>>> this.init="functionName"; -> To be called in deployment
>>>>> this.destroy="functionName"; -> To be called on undeployment
>>>>>
>>>>> Jonathan proposed destruct instead of destroy.
>>>>> What do u guys this how should we go about this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Keith.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mashup-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://www.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mashup-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mashup-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://www.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mashup-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mashup-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mashup-dev
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Mashup-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mashup-dev
