I'll update our already existing integration test to capture the
scenarios below.

Thanks,
Keith.

Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> One of my concerns is getting a more rigorous test of the Javascript data
> binding, both in the server and in the stubs.  We had a number of bugs in
> the last release because the matrix is quite complicated.  MASHUP-737,
> MASHUP-731, MASHUP-730, MASHUP-677, MASHUP-670 are some of the symptoms.
> 
> I'm also not completely confident of my code because the XSLT has gotten
> pretty hairy and is prone to breakage.  Having automated regression tests
> available for this would be quite valuable. 
> 
> Basically, for each XSD and Javascript datatype, we need to test that:
> 1) A wire-level value of the described (annotated) type is made available in
> the mashup as an appropriate Javascript type.
> 2) The output of the mashup results in the correct serialized type for each
> appropriate dynamic type (e.g. return new Date() should be compatible with
> outputType="xs:dateTime").
> 3) The wire-level serialization is made available in the stub as an
> appropriate Javascript type (test separately for DOM, E4X stubs)
> 4) The stub invoked with a JS value results in the correct serialized type
> (test separately for DOM, E4X).
> 5) Arrays of each of the above (1-4) are correctly supported.
> 
> There are more tests for the cases where no annotation exists, but they are
> perhaps a second phase.
> 
> Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
>  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Behalf Of Yumani Ranaweera
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 2:43 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [Fwd: [mashup-dev] Mashup Server 1.1 Testing]
>>
>> Re-sending the mail as you might have missed the previous mail because
>> I had my machine date backdated :( .
>>
>> -Yumani
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject:     [mashup-dev] Mashup Server 1.1 Testing
>> Date:        Sat, 09 Jul 2005 14:18:18 +0600
>> From:        Yumani Ranaweera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To:    [email protected]
>> To:  [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am planning to start Mashup Server 1.1 testing and documentation
>> using the defect list (bugs/improvements/features Resolved for 1.1 ->64
>> JIRAs) in the attachment.
>>
>> Please let me know if you guys have any other priorities.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Yumani
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mashup-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mashup-dev
> 


_______________________________________________
Mashup-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mashup-dev

Reply via email to