No problem with that.  I totally agree case sensitivity during searches is a
usability issue, and I have an open JIRA on that.  Dealing with the
"applyTag" behavior will definitely help.
 
Only drawback is that it doesn't address all the case-sensitivity issues we
have - e.g. searching for usernames, titles, and descriptions also needs to
be done case-insensitively.  That work I imagine still needs to happen in
the UI.

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Glen Daniels
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 12:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mashup-dev
> Subject: [Mashup-dev] Tags and case-sensitivity
> 
> Hey Registry folk and Mashup folk:
> 
> I am about to make a significant change (a fix, I think) to the way
> tags
> work and wanted to run it past people.  Right now tags are case
> sensitive.  If I applyTag(r, "foo") and then applyTag(r, "Foo"), there
> will be *two* separate tags on the resource.  We also are case-
> sensitive
> when searching, so looking for "foo" will NOT currently find "FOO" or
> "Foo".
> 
> I believe this is a serious usability problem, and am in the midst of
> fixing this to work as follows - the *first* time a tag is applied, it
> will maintain case, but searches will still find it even if they
> specify
> a different case.  Future taggings which differ only in case will
> simply
> up the counter on the existing tag.
> 
> applyTag(r, "Foo")  // now there's one tag "Foo"
> // Any time after here a search for "foo" with any case will succeed
> applyTag(r, "FOO")  // still only one tag "Foo", but two taggings.
> 
> Any issues with this?
> 
> Thanks,
> --Glen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mashup-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mashup-dev


_______________________________________________
Mashup-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mashup-dev

Reply via email to