J Cook wrote:
>     Yeah,  Catalyst  looks very interesting - the  only thing is its 
> documentation is usually either stale or lacking - IMO.

You may want to keep an eye on Jifty, which is a different framework 
that is more closely aligned with Mason.  It's younger than Catalyst in 
terms of manhours, but it is being heavily developed by BestPractical 
(creators of RT) for a new community website.

        http://www.jifty.org

This would mean you wouldn't have to necessarily rewrite your components 
as modules (though you might want to slice them up into smaller components).

HTH

John

-- 
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD  20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748


_______________________________________________
Mason-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users

Reply via email to