Have a look at Cache::Memcached. Mason's internal caching mechanism's, while simple, leave alot to be desired in the performance area. Adding NFS or another network filesystem to the mix is bound to make it even worse.
Vincent Veselosky wrote: > Just wondering if anyone has experience with this. Does it work well > to have multiple Mason servers sharing a single data cache over NFS? > Or are there file-locking or contention issues that make this more > trouble than it is worth? It would be convenient to do it since it > would mean more cache hits across the pool of web servers, and it's > easier to flush the cache in one place rather than once per server. > But if the locking isn't handled properly, I can also see it becoming > a big mess. > > Bueller? Anyone? :) > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Mason-users mailing list Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
